This is Kavex98162's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hi, can you please stop moving empty (or other) templates around? You are creating empty pages and redirects which then need to be deleted, which is rather useless work for everyone involved. Fram ( talk) 14:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavex98162 ( talk • contribs) 18:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You didn't ask a question; based on your edits this help request, I strongly advise you learn the basics before using semi-automated tools. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 21:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop mucking about. There are several ways an article may be deleted. This is not one. BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 09:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a discussion about your edits at WP:ANI#Disruptive move / delete attempts. Fram ( talk) 10:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GirthSummit
(blether)
10:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Kavex98162 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I really need Wikipedia. I promise but what’s the move feature for? My actions and justification are here /info/en/?search=Talk:Oliver_Emanuel. As a previous poster mentioned I went about it the wrong way and am not sure how to proceed and not getting much help. I don’t want to draw attention to myself or vandalise the page. Kavex98162 (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
User has indicated they should not be unblocked. GirthSummit (blether) 20:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hmmm... I think... you shouldn’t unblock me to stop me editing other people’s pages.
Do you think legal will reply or will it just stay like that forever.
Could someone unblock me please. I promise not to vandalise other people’s pages. I’m not making legal threats because I can’t afford a lawyer, and besides I don’t trust them. I keep getting blocked for being disruptive. How does asserting my legal right make me disruptive. Every time I post something it gets undone, if I undo the post I get blocked.
This is being done by primefac, and others. I just checked and primefac is oversight and beurocrat, no wonder I’m not getting anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavex98162 ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I can’t defend myself if I get blocked for undoing vandalism. I presented a logical legal argument which I have included below. I am a proponent of internal policies because often the law is inadequate in it’s reach, and scope, for example clamping down on sock puppetry.
Suggesting a deletion discussion of Oliver Emanuel on the talk page or removal of non biographical information that can be used to identify and process personal information of individuals other than the subject of the biography, specifically those in red ink.
Suggest suppression of the edit history from admin.
Suggest Revision deletion and suppression of edit history.
Suggest blanking page until discussion is completed.
Suggest blanking the page until a legal consensus is reached on inclusion of other people’s names in a biography of a living person.
Suggest a consensus on the inclusion of living persons in an Encyclopedia at all, and blanking of BLP pages until a review is completed.
Tabloid journalism is not a reliable source of information and I suspect the source reference justifying inclusion of other people and this page has not adhered to the Wikipedia policy for referencing.
I suggest a specific policy for including lists or tables of names of other people on an other persons biography is included on the BLP help page, and the page oversight protected. A rigorous inclusion criteria should require reputable references that confirm the person has played a significant part in the life of the author, such as non tabloid sources confirming family members names and occupations. Borderline self promotion or abuse of Wikipedia as a web host.
The text below is from the BLP Wikipedia advice page (retrieved 17/1/2020). Privacy of names Shortcuts WP:BLPNAME WP:LPNAME Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations -Actors (my additional text)- , it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context.
Should removal of names significantly affect context page should be deleted A1 no context.
The below text was retrieved on 17/1/20 from the ICO and British Government website.
What is personal data?
At a glance
Understanding whether you are processing personal data is critical to understanding whether the UK GDPR applies to your activities. Personal data is information that relates to an identified or identifiable individual. What identifies an individual could be as simple as a name or a number or could include other identifiers such as an IP address or a cookie identifier, or other factors. If it is possible to identify an individual directly from the information you are processing, then that information may be personal data. Gov.uk, P8
When does the right to erasure apply?
Individuals have the right to have their personal data erased if:
the personal data is no longer necessary for the purpose which you originally collected or processed it for; you are relying on consent as your lawful basis for holding the data, and the individual withdraws their consent;
The only justification not to remove personal data is to protect life, implausible as ceasing to process personal data would achieve the same purpose. Adding personal information should be considered in the same terms. Did adding personal information pose a threat to an individuals life.
I am not happy it fell on my shoulders to start this discussion and it is completely inappropriate that I should be doing so or participating in any further discussion other than to withdraw my consent to process my personal data, and request a deletion discussion which I nominate and vote for, twice! 82.132.216.183 (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Not done: You have been told multiple times that a name appearing in a table (validly, I might add) cannot and will not just be suppressed just because you don't want it there. Legal has been informed, there is nothing to suppress, so I really wish you'd just be patient and let them get back to you. Primefac (talk) 19:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
To give an answer to the question, the answer is that the content is not suppressible, which is why it hasn't been suppressed, and will not be suppressed, unless Legal tells us otherwise. You made a reasonable request, which was declined and passed up the chain, and now you need to wait until Legal says something (if they say anything at all). Primefac (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Can someone also please delete my f****ing name from this talk page.
Wikipedia is freely editable and anyone can write what they want. To delete a name added ‘in error’ to a page from the edit history all that’s required is to request wikipedia stop processing personal data, and it must be deleted so it can’t be undeleted to comply with GDPR. The edit history can and should be suppressed and undelete protected until Legal can deal with it.
Whoah... this is suppression of legitimate interest by admin. This has not been resolved. GDPR does apply to US companies who collect information about EU Citizens.
https://gdpr.eu/compliance-checklist-us-companies/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.219.182 ( talk) 22:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
This is Kavex98162's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hi, can you please stop moving empty (or other) templates around? You are creating empty pages and redirects which then need to be deleted, which is rather useless work for everyone involved. Fram ( talk) 14:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavex98162 ( talk • contribs) 18:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You didn't ask a question; based on your edits this help request, I strongly advise you learn the basics before using semi-automated tools. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 21:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop mucking about. There are several ways an article may be deleted. This is not one. BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 09:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a discussion about your edits at WP:ANI#Disruptive move / delete attempts. Fram ( talk) 10:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GirthSummit
(blether)
10:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Kavex98162 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I really need Wikipedia. I promise but what’s the move feature for? My actions and justification are here /info/en/?search=Talk:Oliver_Emanuel. As a previous poster mentioned I went about it the wrong way and am not sure how to proceed and not getting much help. I don’t want to draw attention to myself or vandalise the page. Kavex98162 (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
User has indicated they should not be unblocked. GirthSummit (blether) 20:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hmmm... I think... you shouldn’t unblock me to stop me editing other people’s pages.
Do you think legal will reply or will it just stay like that forever.
Could someone unblock me please. I promise not to vandalise other people’s pages. I’m not making legal threats because I can’t afford a lawyer, and besides I don’t trust them. I keep getting blocked for being disruptive. How does asserting my legal right make me disruptive. Every time I post something it gets undone, if I undo the post I get blocked.
This is being done by primefac, and others. I just checked and primefac is oversight and beurocrat, no wonder I’m not getting anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavex98162 ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I can’t defend myself if I get blocked for undoing vandalism. I presented a logical legal argument which I have included below. I am a proponent of internal policies because often the law is inadequate in it’s reach, and scope, for example clamping down on sock puppetry.
Suggesting a deletion discussion of Oliver Emanuel on the talk page or removal of non biographical information that can be used to identify and process personal information of individuals other than the subject of the biography, specifically those in red ink.
Suggest suppression of the edit history from admin.
Suggest Revision deletion and suppression of edit history.
Suggest blanking page until discussion is completed.
Suggest blanking the page until a legal consensus is reached on inclusion of other people’s names in a biography of a living person.
Suggest a consensus on the inclusion of living persons in an Encyclopedia at all, and blanking of BLP pages until a review is completed.
Tabloid journalism is not a reliable source of information and I suspect the source reference justifying inclusion of other people and this page has not adhered to the Wikipedia policy for referencing.
I suggest a specific policy for including lists or tables of names of other people on an other persons biography is included on the BLP help page, and the page oversight protected. A rigorous inclusion criteria should require reputable references that confirm the person has played a significant part in the life of the author, such as non tabloid sources confirming family members names and occupations. Borderline self promotion or abuse of Wikipedia as a web host.
The text below is from the BLP Wikipedia advice page (retrieved 17/1/2020). Privacy of names Shortcuts WP:BLPNAME WP:LPNAME Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations -Actors (my additional text)- , it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context.
Should removal of names significantly affect context page should be deleted A1 no context.
The below text was retrieved on 17/1/20 from the ICO and British Government website.
What is personal data?
At a glance
Understanding whether you are processing personal data is critical to understanding whether the UK GDPR applies to your activities. Personal data is information that relates to an identified or identifiable individual. What identifies an individual could be as simple as a name or a number or could include other identifiers such as an IP address or a cookie identifier, or other factors. If it is possible to identify an individual directly from the information you are processing, then that information may be personal data. Gov.uk, P8
When does the right to erasure apply?
Individuals have the right to have their personal data erased if:
the personal data is no longer necessary for the purpose which you originally collected or processed it for; you are relying on consent as your lawful basis for holding the data, and the individual withdraws their consent;
The only justification not to remove personal data is to protect life, implausible as ceasing to process personal data would achieve the same purpose. Adding personal information should be considered in the same terms. Did adding personal information pose a threat to an individuals life.
I am not happy it fell on my shoulders to start this discussion and it is completely inappropriate that I should be doing so or participating in any further discussion other than to withdraw my consent to process my personal data, and request a deletion discussion which I nominate and vote for, twice! 82.132.216.183 (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Not done: You have been told multiple times that a name appearing in a table (validly, I might add) cannot and will not just be suppressed just because you don't want it there. Legal has been informed, there is nothing to suppress, so I really wish you'd just be patient and let them get back to you. Primefac (talk) 19:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
To give an answer to the question, the answer is that the content is not suppressible, which is why it hasn't been suppressed, and will not be suppressed, unless Legal tells us otherwise. You made a reasonable request, which was declined and passed up the chain, and now you need to wait until Legal says something (if they say anything at all). Primefac (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Can someone also please delete my f****ing name from this talk page.
Wikipedia is freely editable and anyone can write what they want. To delete a name added ‘in error’ to a page from the edit history all that’s required is to request wikipedia stop processing personal data, and it must be deleted so it can’t be undeleted to comply with GDPR. The edit history can and should be suppressed and undelete protected until Legal can deal with it.
Whoah... this is suppression of legitimate interest by admin. This has not been resolved. GDPR does apply to US companies who collect information about EU Citizens.
https://gdpr.eu/compliance-checklist-us-companies/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.219.182 ( talk) 22:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)