Feel free to talk to me here about my contributions or interests.
Hello. Did you need help with something? Pepsidrinka 04:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thanks! I'm wondering about a recent edit to a page I added an external link to. Let me show you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_home
I added the last external link on that page, and someone has slapped a "SPAM" label on it. I didn't intend it as spam, and I'm not sure of the protocol here or how to proceed, if at all.
Many thanks for the gammer / spelling on the obesity page. Mine are both horrible.
-- Doc James ( talk) 16:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Sure thing, Doc! I'm a bit of a grammar nitpicker. Plenty of room for me to indulge that streak on these pages. -- KateH ( talk) 13:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Benedict Arnold: patriot and traitor By Willard Sterne Randall
This book makes the point that Reed assumed anyone who disagreed or crossed him was a Loyalist and traitor. And his unrelenting attacks on Arnold, his new wife's family, and others of his circle were instrumental in Arnold's decision to turn traitor. But more important for the Reed article it should be pointed out how he fought with those on the American side who where not as radical he. Most histories of the revolution play down the discord between: individual politicians, political theories, and states. Not to mention the often destructive battles of army v. congress and state militia v. the continentals.
On a separate note Randall's A Little Revenge: Benjamin Franklin and His Son is a superior read. If you haven't had a chance you should give it a look. And finally the Pennsylvania Archives edited by George Edward Reed 1900 is available in Google Books and the 4th series includes the period of Reed's presidency.
Nitpyck (
talk)
19:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the reading recommendations. Which one of these covers Washington's expulsion of Reed from the military for cowardice?-- KateH ( talk) 10:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Feel free to talk to me here about my contributions or interests.
Hello. Did you need help with something? Pepsidrinka 04:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thanks! I'm wondering about a recent edit to a page I added an external link to. Let me show you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_home
I added the last external link on that page, and someone has slapped a "SPAM" label on it. I didn't intend it as spam, and I'm not sure of the protocol here or how to proceed, if at all.
Many thanks for the gammer / spelling on the obesity page. Mine are both horrible.
-- Doc James ( talk) 16:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Sure thing, Doc! I'm a bit of a grammar nitpicker. Plenty of room for me to indulge that streak on these pages. -- KateH ( talk) 13:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Benedict Arnold: patriot and traitor By Willard Sterne Randall
This book makes the point that Reed assumed anyone who disagreed or crossed him was a Loyalist and traitor. And his unrelenting attacks on Arnold, his new wife's family, and others of his circle were instrumental in Arnold's decision to turn traitor. But more important for the Reed article it should be pointed out how he fought with those on the American side who where not as radical he. Most histories of the revolution play down the discord between: individual politicians, political theories, and states. Not to mention the often destructive battles of army v. congress and state militia v. the continentals.
On a separate note Randall's A Little Revenge: Benjamin Franklin and His Son is a superior read. If you haven't had a chance you should give it a look. And finally the Pennsylvania Archives edited by George Edward Reed 1900 is available in Google Books and the 4th series includes the period of Reed's presidency.
Nitpyck (
talk)
19:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the reading recommendations. Which one of these covers Washington's expulsion of Reed from the military for cowardice?-- KateH ( talk) 10:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)