Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. - Samsara ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Answer on the article discussion!-- KarlV 19:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely for an egregious violation of WP:POINT concerning the article Bad Nenndorf. Wikipedia is not an experiment for you to play with. Your actions incited disruption and unneeded edit warring. The place where you admit that you used Wikipedia as an experiment is documented here. pschemp | talk 21:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|Dear all, I didn't intend to engage in [[WP:POINT]]. I was just checking that the same mistake didn't appear in the English Wiki as it had in the German one. I'm sorry for breaking the 3RR rule and I undertake to edit within the policies from now on. My imperfect English led me to call what I was doing an "experiment", which some people have taken the wrong way. I won't make that mistake again, and I apologize to all concerned for the confusion I caused. Please can I be unblocked? Kind regards --[[User:KarlV|KarlV]] 12:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)|As below, also I notice your userpage declares "This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English."}}
Please do consider providing an english translation xyzzy_n, thanks! ++ Lar: t/ c 20:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Karl, I have unblocked your account and 'commented out' the unblock request above. Hopefully things will go more smoothly in the future. -- CBD 17:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Karl,
Thanks for your kind comments about the Bad Nenndorf article! -- ChrisO 23:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked you and Gancefort for 24 hours for edit warring on Alfred-Maurice de Zayas. Continue to edit war without discussion and it will escalate very rapidly. Neil ☎ 10:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hallo KarlV, I see that you've been editing the article Alfred-Maurice de Zayas before. If you still observe en.wikipedia, you may have a look at the article if you like. Since it appears to be entirely not neutral, I've recently added a paragraph about the reception of Alfred-Maurice's books on German history, and by the way re-added sourced bithdates of Alfred-Maurice to the first sentence, which had been deleted before. A user:Gancefort has reverted back my changes. After receiving a three revert rule-warning, this account has stopped editing wikipedia, but instead changing IPs have started to remove material. Other IPs have also continued to discuss on talk:Alfred-Maurice de Zayas in an entirely unpleasent style.The same group of persons or individual hiding behind the IPs also seem to control articles about Alf-Maurice's books Nemesis at Potsdam, A Terrible Revenge and The Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau, 1939-1945. In my last edit on Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, I've re-added a neutrality template, which I hope will stay for while. I guess that neutrality issues of this article can be resolved on the long term by drawing a wider attention to it. Perhaps you've another idea what could by done about this problem? -- Schwalker ( talk) 08:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, Karl, you still haven't answered to my suggestion here that you're lying. These are of course very serious accusations, 'ganz starker Tabak', and raise the question that perhaps my assumptions are correct. MfG, Estlandia (Miacek) (dialogue) 13:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. - Samsara ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Answer on the article discussion!-- KarlV 19:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely for an egregious violation of WP:POINT concerning the article Bad Nenndorf. Wikipedia is not an experiment for you to play with. Your actions incited disruption and unneeded edit warring. The place where you admit that you used Wikipedia as an experiment is documented here. pschemp | talk 21:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|Dear all, I didn't intend to engage in [[WP:POINT]]. I was just checking that the same mistake didn't appear in the English Wiki as it had in the German one. I'm sorry for breaking the 3RR rule and I undertake to edit within the policies from now on. My imperfect English led me to call what I was doing an "experiment", which some people have taken the wrong way. I won't make that mistake again, and I apologize to all concerned for the confusion I caused. Please can I be unblocked? Kind regards --[[User:KarlV|KarlV]] 12:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)|As below, also I notice your userpage declares "This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English."}}
Please do consider providing an english translation xyzzy_n, thanks! ++ Lar: t/ c 20:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Karl, I have unblocked your account and 'commented out' the unblock request above. Hopefully things will go more smoothly in the future. -- CBD 17:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Karl,
Thanks for your kind comments about the Bad Nenndorf article! -- ChrisO 23:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked you and Gancefort for 24 hours for edit warring on Alfred-Maurice de Zayas. Continue to edit war without discussion and it will escalate very rapidly. Neil ☎ 10:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hallo KarlV, I see that you've been editing the article Alfred-Maurice de Zayas before. If you still observe en.wikipedia, you may have a look at the article if you like. Since it appears to be entirely not neutral, I've recently added a paragraph about the reception of Alfred-Maurice's books on German history, and by the way re-added sourced bithdates of Alfred-Maurice to the first sentence, which had been deleted before. A user:Gancefort has reverted back my changes. After receiving a three revert rule-warning, this account has stopped editing wikipedia, but instead changing IPs have started to remove material. Other IPs have also continued to discuss on talk:Alfred-Maurice de Zayas in an entirely unpleasent style.The same group of persons or individual hiding behind the IPs also seem to control articles about Alf-Maurice's books Nemesis at Potsdam, A Terrible Revenge and The Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau, 1939-1945. In my last edit on Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, I've re-added a neutrality template, which I hope will stay for while. I guess that neutrality issues of this article can be resolved on the long term by drawing a wider attention to it. Perhaps you've another idea what could by done about this problem? -- Schwalker ( talk) 08:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, Karl, you still haven't answered to my suggestion here that you're lying. These are of course very serious accusations, 'ganz starker Tabak', and raise the question that perhaps my assumptions are correct. MfG, Estlandia (Miacek) (dialogue) 13:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)