From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spamming

Please stop adding spam links to hihindi.com articles. It qualifies as neither a reliable source nor an appropriate external link for wikipedia. Abecedare ( talk) 17:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC) reply

December 2018

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Grocery store, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding links to hihindi.com as requested above. Wham2001 ( talk) 18:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC) reply

January 2019

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 09:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist ( talk) 09:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Hello sir, good evening. Before writing anything, I apologize to the Wikipedia team. In fact, some time ago, in the editing of an article, a link to my blog https://hihindi.com/ was inadvertently added to the Wikipedia article. I came to know about this through a notice sent by the Wikipedia team. I humbly request wiki team to remove my blog from spam list, I promise no such action will be taken in future. I hope my Wikipedia team will forgive and unblock me for this unintentional accident. apologetic Kana ram jattt ( talk) 14:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

"Inadvertently"? Nonsense. You added it to four different articles. "Unintentional"? You are responsible for your own edits. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I apologize For This its happen in ignorance Kana ram jattt ( talk) 15:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Just a few minutes ago, you were asking for your blog to be removed from the spam list. Nothing here convinces me that you now understand how your edits were inappropriate and how your request in your previous unblock request was wrong. Yamla ( talk) 15:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

My reasoning behind unblocking my blog is that I will never edit any Wikipedia page in the future until I am familiar with all the terms, guidelines and disregards. Also, the wiki team should keep an eye on my activities, if any such work is done from my side, then I should be completely blocked. Kana ram jattt ( talk) 15:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Since you don't intend to edit until you are familiar with our policies, we'll just leave the block in place until you can demonstrate your familiarity with the policies relevant to your edits. 331dot ( talk) 15:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Absolutely, I agree. Even after all the requests, if you can not unblock then please keep it. But take my blog off the spam list, since you put it on the spam list I am facing restrictions from Google. In future I would not like to take any such action so that I can be put on the spam list again. If you accept my request, adopting a human approach, it will be very kind. Kana ram jattt ( talk) 16:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I have carefully reviewed your request and regret I must decline it. You have requested to be unblocked purely to request removal of a website you claim to own/operate from the WP:BLACKLIST. The Blacklist removal instructions guide us that "Requests from site owners or anyone with a conflict of interest will be declined." [1], therefore, this is not a demonstrable need for you to have access to your account restored. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. Chetsford ( talk) 18:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

hello sir I am not belong to hihindi.com or not operate it. Some time age in 2019 I did a guest post in this blog and I share this link insert in wiki by mistake, so please restore this web 🙏🙏 Kana ram jattt ( talk) 20:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I agree that this is going nowhere. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is going nowhere. WP:IDHT, at the very least, applies here. Probably worse. -- Yamla ( talk) 23:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spamming

Please stop adding spam links to hihindi.com articles. It qualifies as neither a reliable source nor an appropriate external link for wikipedia. Abecedare ( talk) 17:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC) reply

December 2018

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Grocery store, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding links to hihindi.com as requested above. Wham2001 ( talk) 18:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC) reply

January 2019

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 09:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist ( talk) 09:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Hello sir, good evening. Before writing anything, I apologize to the Wikipedia team. In fact, some time ago, in the editing of an article, a link to my blog https://hihindi.com/ was inadvertently added to the Wikipedia article. I came to know about this through a notice sent by the Wikipedia team. I humbly request wiki team to remove my blog from spam list, I promise no such action will be taken in future. I hope my Wikipedia team will forgive and unblock me for this unintentional accident. apologetic Kana ram jattt ( talk) 14:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

"Inadvertently"? Nonsense. You added it to four different articles. "Unintentional"? You are responsible for your own edits. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I apologize For This its happen in ignorance Kana ram jattt ( talk) 15:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Just a few minutes ago, you were asking for your blog to be removed from the spam list. Nothing here convinces me that you now understand how your edits were inappropriate and how your request in your previous unblock request was wrong. Yamla ( talk) 15:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

My reasoning behind unblocking my blog is that I will never edit any Wikipedia page in the future until I am familiar with all the terms, guidelines and disregards. Also, the wiki team should keep an eye on my activities, if any such work is done from my side, then I should be completely blocked. Kana ram jattt ( talk) 15:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Since you don't intend to edit until you are familiar with our policies, we'll just leave the block in place until you can demonstrate your familiarity with the policies relevant to your edits. 331dot ( talk) 15:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Absolutely, I agree. Even after all the requests, if you can not unblock then please keep it. But take my blog off the spam list, since you put it on the spam list I am facing restrictions from Google. In future I would not like to take any such action so that I can be put on the spam list again. If you accept my request, adopting a human approach, it will be very kind. Kana ram jattt ( talk) 16:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I have carefully reviewed your request and regret I must decline it. You have requested to be unblocked purely to request removal of a website you claim to own/operate from the WP:BLACKLIST. The Blacklist removal instructions guide us that "Requests from site owners or anyone with a conflict of interest will be declined." [1], therefore, this is not a demonstrable need for you to have access to your account restored. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. Chetsford ( talk) 18:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kana ram jattt ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

hello sir I am not belong to hihindi.com or not operate it. Some time age in 2019 I did a guest post in this blog and I share this link insert in wiki by mistake, so please restore this web 🙏🙏 Kana ram jattt ( talk) 20:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I agree that this is going nowhere. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is going nowhere. WP:IDHT, at the very least, applies here. Probably worse. -- Yamla ( talk) 23:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook