Whoever has "raised concern" that I am a sock puppet needs to be investigated. What is their agenda?
I am a free person with a free opinion: because it counters the agenda I am abused.
Go to hell.
You really need to read up on sock puppetry before you throw around terms like "abuse" with gay abandon. A checkuser confirmed that User:Gamblor72 and User:AnotherBookReader are the same person; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gamblor72/Archive.
Now, Wikipedia rules provide that "editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way to suggest that they are multiple people"; see WP:ILLEGIT. Therefore it is entirely appropriate to strike through the deceptive comments by User:AnotherBookReader in accordance with this rule. User:AnotherBookReader is a "non-person", just a clone of User:Gamblor72.
Oh, and by the way, legal entreaties like this one are likely to get you blocked. WWGB ( talk) 22:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Whoever has "raised concern" that I am a sock puppet needs to be investigated. What is their agenda?
I am a free person with a free opinion: because it counters the agenda I am abused.
Go to hell.
You really need to read up on sock puppetry before you throw around terms like "abuse" with gay abandon. A checkuser confirmed that User:Gamblor72 and User:AnotherBookReader are the same person; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gamblor72/Archive.
Now, Wikipedia rules provide that "editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way to suggest that they are multiple people"; see WP:ILLEGIT. Therefore it is entirely appropriate to strike through the deceptive comments by User:AnotherBookReader in accordance with this rule. User:AnotherBookReader is a "non-person", just a clone of User:Gamblor72.
Oh, and by the way, legal entreaties like this one are likely to get you blocked. WWGB ( talk) 22:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)