This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It is not proper to unclose a discussion on ani when you don't like the outcome. Please don't repeat that. Toddst1 ( talk) 05:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Am endeavoring to avoid further conflict with you, so have made no formal complaints regarding your attempts to alter my posts here or the edit war you attempted with this post, but you are not welcome to "clerk" my user space. [1] In light of past complaints this has the appearance of deliberate boundary-testing and provocative behavior. I am doing my best to maintain polite distance; please reciprocate. Durova 359 02:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Just so you know, the two edits you reverted as "vandalism" from an IP editor on Todd Palin last night weren't, they were good-faith and accurate (albeit unsourced) edits. Todd Palin preferred to be known as "First Dude", and there are tens of thousands of references in Google. The first page of search results for "Todd Palin" "first dude" includes hits from CNN, Salon, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Politico, ABC News, and a bunch of other reliable, mainstream sources. I'm not going to change it back, but if it is re-added, I would recommend not being so quick to nuke it. Horologium (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! I'm just so proud to be here! Thanks for dropping by. Please take a second to take a look at my little note above, which is also included as an editnotice for this page. If it makes sense for me to reply to anything you bring up here, I'll probably copy over your post and my reply to your talk page, and watchlist it and respond further (when appropriate) there. This way conversations will hopefully stick together. (And that's a Good Thing!) When I archive things posted here, I'll also archive the initial reply along with a link to the diff, so that folks can follow the conversation from there (if they'd like). If you have something quick you'd like to bring to my attention, you can also always send me an email right here via Wikipedia. I'll try my best to be quick to reply, in either case. Thanks for stopping by! user:J ( talk) 16:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, what did I do that violated wikipedia policy on the Alex Jones page? You just mentioned me for on the "incidents" page. I did not destruct the actual wikipedia page and what i discussed on the talk page was polite, quick and straight forward and has to do with real issues regarding the fact that the Alex Jones page could certainly use some expansion so I see nothing wrong with what was posted on the talk page. The talk page is there for a reason so editors like ourselves can discuss and make informed descisions regarding the quality of wikipedia pages. If i did something wrong, fill me in as I will be sure not to make a similar error. Iscream22 ( talk) 13:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I was asked for some help dealing with a disruptive IP adding "alumni" sections to Booz & Company. There is a similar section at Booz Allen Hamilton. The entries in these sections have references which don't necessarily confirm the association. I don't do a lot of editing on corporate articles and don't know if these sections are appropriate. Would take a look, if you get a chance? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 18:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It is not proper to unclose a discussion on ani when you don't like the outcome. Please don't repeat that. Toddst1 ( talk) 05:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Am endeavoring to avoid further conflict with you, so have made no formal complaints regarding your attempts to alter my posts here or the edit war you attempted with this post, but you are not welcome to "clerk" my user space. [1] In light of past complaints this has the appearance of deliberate boundary-testing and provocative behavior. I am doing my best to maintain polite distance; please reciprocate. Durova 359 02:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Just so you know, the two edits you reverted as "vandalism" from an IP editor on Todd Palin last night weren't, they were good-faith and accurate (albeit unsourced) edits. Todd Palin preferred to be known as "First Dude", and there are tens of thousands of references in Google. The first page of search results for "Todd Palin" "first dude" includes hits from CNN, Salon, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Politico, ABC News, and a bunch of other reliable, mainstream sources. I'm not going to change it back, but if it is re-added, I would recommend not being so quick to nuke it. Horologium (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! I'm just so proud to be here! Thanks for dropping by. Please take a second to take a look at my little note above, which is also included as an editnotice for this page. If it makes sense for me to reply to anything you bring up here, I'll probably copy over your post and my reply to your talk page, and watchlist it and respond further (when appropriate) there. This way conversations will hopefully stick together. (And that's a Good Thing!) When I archive things posted here, I'll also archive the initial reply along with a link to the diff, so that folks can follow the conversation from there (if they'd like). If you have something quick you'd like to bring to my attention, you can also always send me an email right here via Wikipedia. I'll try my best to be quick to reply, in either case. Thanks for stopping by! user:J ( talk) 16:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, what did I do that violated wikipedia policy on the Alex Jones page? You just mentioned me for on the "incidents" page. I did not destruct the actual wikipedia page and what i discussed on the talk page was polite, quick and straight forward and has to do with real issues regarding the fact that the Alex Jones page could certainly use some expansion so I see nothing wrong with what was posted on the talk page. The talk page is there for a reason so editors like ourselves can discuss and make informed descisions regarding the quality of wikipedia pages. If i did something wrong, fill me in as I will be sure not to make a similar error. Iscream22 ( talk) 13:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I was asked for some help dealing with a disruptive IP adding "alumni" sections to Booz & Company. There is a similar section at Booz Allen Hamilton. The entries in these sections have references which don't necessarily confirm the association. I don't do a lot of editing on corporate articles and don't know if these sections are appropriate. Would take a look, if you get a chance? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 18:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)