![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I have a question, you've deleted IBS Group page, I believe you did it with racialist intention, as IBS Group being the largest Russian based IT Company. If we take for instance such IT companies as: Logica PLC, Wipro, Infosys, Capgemini, Atos all of mentioned companies have their company profiles on your Wikipedia. The page was rewritten couple of time so that it fits in line with the Wikipedia policy, what is more interesting it was revised by moderators of Wikipedia couple of times, where none of them had found any sign of SPAM, I understand if you would edits IBS Groups page, at least it would look as you are interested in keeping the article, but by deleting it…. Taking into account what I've just mentioned, i believe the deletion of IBS Groups page was made with the intention to damage their right of free speech, if you believe that IBS Groups page was spam, than please be so kind delete the pages of companies mentioned above, their structure and content is same as it was in IBS Groups page. Looking forward for your reply & and hoping on your moderate opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starclass ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
inetnum 217.74.47.0 - 217.74.47.255 netname IBS descr IBS Ltd Corporate Nerwork country RU admin-c ASK4-RIPE tech-c ASK4-RIPE admin-c RNA74-RIPE tech-c RNA74-RIPE status ASSIGNED PA mnt-by IBS-MNT-RIPE source RIPE # Filtered
Are we done here? Guy ( Help!) 16:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crank sensor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crank sensor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Destynova ( talk) 23:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Any ideas what to do with this? It may have qualified for A3 when first posted. I never feel comfortable moving a user's work to their userspace, leaving a redirect from mainspace to userspace, then nominating for WP:R2. I also don't like the idea of waiting until, "the end of October" but also don't want to bite someone new who's obviously taking a lot of time to write an article. OlYeller Talktome 13:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I have a question, you've deleted IBS Group page, I believe you did it with racialist intention, as IBS Group being the largest Russian based IT Company. If we take for instance such IT companies as: Logica PLC, Wipro, Infosys, Capgemini, Atos all of mentioned companies have their company profiles on your Wikipedia. The page was rewritten couple of time so that it fits in line with the Wikipedia policy, what is more interesting it was revised by moderators of Wikipedia couple of times, where none of them had found any sign of SPAM, I understand if you would edits IBS Groups page, at least it would look as you are interested in keeping the article, but by deleting it…. Taking into account what I've just mentioned, i believe the deletion of IBS Groups page was made with the intention to damage their right of free speech, if you believe that IBS Groups page was spam, than please be so kind delete the pages of companies mentioned above, their structure and content is same as it was in IBS Groups page. Looking forward for your reply & and hoping on your moderate opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starclass ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
inetnum 217.74.47.0 - 217.74.47.255 netname IBS descr IBS Ltd Corporate Nerwork country RU admin-c ASK4-RIPE tech-c ASK4-RIPE admin-c RNA74-RIPE tech-c RNA74-RIPE status ASSIGNED PA mnt-by IBS-MNT-RIPE source RIPE # Filtered
Are we done here? Guy ( Help!) 16:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crank sensor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crank sensor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Destynova ( talk) 23:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Any ideas what to do with this? It may have qualified for A3 when first posted. I never feel comfortable moving a user's work to their userspace, leaving a redirect from mainspace to userspace, then nominating for WP:R2. I also don't like the idea of waiting until, "the end of October" but also don't want to bite someone new who's obviously taking a lot of time to write an article. OlYeller Talktome 13:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)