Good addition. A bit more likely than some of the works found in that section! Amandajm ( talk) 08:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
One of the most basic rules of editting is to look. It is a good idea to do it both before and after you save. This is because your edit to one section may affect the section below it as well, or may have a badly formatted reference. Neither of these problems show up if you are only editing a small section. In this case, the formatting of the section was stuffed up. I have saved to one of your previous states, so as not to lose the must important part of your contribution. Amandajm ( talk) 05:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
When adding images
Amandajm ( talk) 05:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Jwpetty1951. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci), you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Felcotiya ( talk) 11:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Your addition to
Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci) has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. --
Felcotiya (
talk)
11:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, and for addressing some of the concerns I’ve raised related to the Horse and Rider article. On the specific points:
I appreciate the steep learning curve for engaging with the Wikipedia community, but there really is no other way to achieve what you're after. It's only difficult at first; I've learned by going through the uphill route of following what others do, but I know there are channels such as the chat at Wikipedia:Help desk that can help in other ways. Help:Using talk pages might be another useful place to start? If your information can only be shared privately, then an encyclopedia article is not the place for it. It's the art experts publishing their opinions and the collective Wikipedia community reading and referencing them that you need to work with, not a single editor. I look forward to seeing you on the article's discussion page at Talk:Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci). -- Felcotiya ( talk) 20:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is
Horse and Rider. Thank you. —
Felcotiya (
talk)
20:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
I have reverted your most recent edits to Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci), as another editor has clearly been contesting your changes via their reverts. I strongly suggest that you start a discussion at Talk:Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci) and conform to WP:CONSENSUS. Note also that, though there have been gaps in your ongoing editing feud with User:Felcotiya ( talk), you must not assume that you have achieved a silent consensus to make changes to the article; this is especially relevant given your connection to the subject (see WP:COI), and due to the fact that your edits have removed references, outdated though they might be. Remember that Wikipedia is built around the idea of productive collaboration between editors. If you have any questions, you make leave a note on my talk page or ping me.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 00:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion concerning your edits at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Horse_and_Rider. You are invited to participate.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 00:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
A sock puppet investigation concerning your account is underway at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jwpetty1951. You are invited to participate.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 19:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Good addition. A bit more likely than some of the works found in that section! Amandajm ( talk) 08:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
One of the most basic rules of editting is to look. It is a good idea to do it both before and after you save. This is because your edit to one section may affect the section below it as well, or may have a badly formatted reference. Neither of these problems show up if you are only editing a small section. In this case, the formatting of the section was stuffed up. I have saved to one of your previous states, so as not to lose the must important part of your contribution. Amandajm ( talk) 05:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
When adding images
Amandajm ( talk) 05:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Jwpetty1951. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci), you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Felcotiya ( talk) 11:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Your addition to
Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci) has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. --
Felcotiya (
talk)
11:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, and for addressing some of the concerns I’ve raised related to the Horse and Rider article. On the specific points:
I appreciate the steep learning curve for engaging with the Wikipedia community, but there really is no other way to achieve what you're after. It's only difficult at first; I've learned by going through the uphill route of following what others do, but I know there are channels such as the chat at Wikipedia:Help desk that can help in other ways. Help:Using talk pages might be another useful place to start? If your information can only be shared privately, then an encyclopedia article is not the place for it. It's the art experts publishing their opinions and the collective Wikipedia community reading and referencing them that you need to work with, not a single editor. I look forward to seeing you on the article's discussion page at Talk:Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci). -- Felcotiya ( talk) 20:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is
Horse and Rider. Thank you. —
Felcotiya (
talk)
20:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
I have reverted your most recent edits to Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci), as another editor has clearly been contesting your changes via their reverts. I strongly suggest that you start a discussion at Talk:Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci) and conform to WP:CONSENSUS. Note also that, though there have been gaps in your ongoing editing feud with User:Felcotiya ( talk), you must not assume that you have achieved a silent consensus to make changes to the article; this is especially relevant given your connection to the subject (see WP:COI), and due to the fact that your edits have removed references, outdated though they might be. Remember that Wikipedia is built around the idea of productive collaboration between editors. If you have any questions, you make leave a note on my talk page or ping me.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 00:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion concerning your edits at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Horse_and_Rider. You are invited to participate.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 00:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
A sock puppet investigation concerning your account is underway at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jwpetty1951. You are invited to participate.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 19:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)