Wikipedia has certain regulations to follow which I respect as an editor but whatever you are trying to do as an editor is defamatory to me and my content handling which can lead to your ban from Wikipedia and I didn't felt it in that way about it until you flipped all false allegation which in actual case you did as an editor starting from invading a stable article, not only changing it totally according to your preference but handling it as an owner, personal attacking by questioning a community's historical presence of people despite provided references attaching your references as only truth, making unrequired fallacy theory out of it.
As a responsible editor i didn't started edit warring it was you from start who came with a book reference, oneself not mentioning exact page number and citation but questioning and forcing other to do it. Whatever you did to this article is wrong and will be wrong, this will promote wrong caste knowledge sharing through your article edit to mass users of Wikipedia even if it takes restrictive actions against me as an editor.
TheJeSUSTICE108 ( talk) 19:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Wikipedia has certain regulations to follow which I respect as an editor but whatever you are trying to do as an editor is defamatory to me and my content handling which can lead to your ban from Wikipedia and I didn't felt it in that way about it until you flipped all false allegation which in actual case you did as an editor starting from invading a stable article, not only changing it totally according to your preference but handling it as an owner, personal attacking by questioning a community's historical presence of people despite provided references attaching your references as only truth, making unrequired fallacy theory out of it.
As a responsible editor i didn't started edit warring it was you from start who came with a book reference, oneself not mentioning exact page number and citation but questioning and forcing other to do it. Whatever you did to this article is wrong and will be wrong, this will promote wrong caste knowledge sharing through your article edit to mass users of Wikipedia even if it takes restrictive actions against me as an editor.
TheJeSUSTICE108 ( talk) 19:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.