Archive 1 | Archive 2 →
How can you call my updating of the NOSSA webpage with legitimate news (from CNN none the less) as vandalism? Perhaps my opinions in the discussion page are a little harsh, but I am cutting and pasting directly from CNN as well as posting the link to the story.
I understand and appreciate your feedback but disagree on one important point. This statement to the press regarding this case was made directly by an officer in the organization who was being quoted as such. Therefore I feel this should go on their webpage. I’ve just added their official statement from the organizations webpage if you feel that balances the story and better provides closure in regards to that officers current status (or lack thereof.) Further as I mentioned on the discussion page; their statement only says they have removed him as secretary, not his membership.
Yes I do; thank you very much for your help and feedback. I will delete my comments in the discussion as well. Your points were well taken.
Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism! Dr Archeville 12:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
For anon IPs that we aren't sure are shared, the template {{whois|OWNERNAME}} is typically used. For confirmed shared IPs the convention is to use {{sharedip|OWNERNAME}}, or {{sharedipEDU|OWNERNAME}} if the shared IP is coming from an educational institution. You can find similar templates listed under Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. Hope that helps! - Loren 06:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks! I put the darn refs thingy in there for preview and forgot to take it out. D'oh. -- iMeowbot~ Meow 05:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
If you don't already, I recommend placing your userpage on your watchlist. You have a friend [1]. Yanksox 05:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
This article high energy weapon design is not about nuclear weapon design . It is about nuclear physics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmayes1965 ( talk • contribs)
It was, sorry I forgot to leave a message. VandalProof automatically sends "you are approved" messages, but Moderators have to manually place the declined notice, and I just forgot. Please request approval when you have reached 250 article edits. Thanks, and my apologies for my mistake. Prodego talk 21:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Ju66l3r/Archive 1, and thank you for your interest in VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!
Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{ User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (this also places the user box attached) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.
If you have any problems, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 07:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
You beat me to the revert :P Viridae Talk 03:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching an IP delete from my page. However, it was actually just me, not signed in. I would appreciate it if you removed the warning from my IP. Thank you. — The Mac Davis ⌇☢ ญƛ. 17:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
for the reverts to my userpage. It's really nice to see others looking out for my stuff =). Alphachimp talk 00:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to ditto Alaphachimps thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, it seems I have attracted a
dickhead. regards
DavidCane
23:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank for reverting my page. I appreciate it greatly. :) -- Coil 04:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
My page too. Altho it wasn't exactly vandalism, I'm amazed you noticed and got it fixed so soon. Thanks. Baiter 23:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting Cohen's Kappa, I hope it lasts.
Femto reverted your revert. And so it goes. Vigilantes rule.
How odd. When you go to their website, they are still live-feeding urban gospel over the internet...but for whatever reason, it's not actually their current playlist over the AM band (like most radio stations). Live and learn. Thanks for removing it after my reversion. ju66l3r 15:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
How can you go and say who is right and who is wrong? Man, I have earned my doctorate already, and you if anyone should be better than that. If you read the discussions those two are 100% hard headed against any outside discussion of who is included. They bully others, and when the tables are turned in the discussion, they run saying personal attacks. They are not protecting that page or protecting Wiki, they are protecting their ultra-Nationalistic ideas with regards to Germany and India. 71.106.195.5 08:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Archive 1 | Archive 2 →
How can you call my updating of the NOSSA webpage with legitimate news (from CNN none the less) as vandalism? Perhaps my opinions in the discussion page are a little harsh, but I am cutting and pasting directly from CNN as well as posting the link to the story.
I understand and appreciate your feedback but disagree on one important point. This statement to the press regarding this case was made directly by an officer in the organization who was being quoted as such. Therefore I feel this should go on their webpage. I’ve just added their official statement from the organizations webpage if you feel that balances the story and better provides closure in regards to that officers current status (or lack thereof.) Further as I mentioned on the discussion page; their statement only says they have removed him as secretary, not his membership.
Yes I do; thank you very much for your help and feedback. I will delete my comments in the discussion as well. Your points were well taken.
Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism! Dr Archeville 12:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
For anon IPs that we aren't sure are shared, the template {{whois|OWNERNAME}} is typically used. For confirmed shared IPs the convention is to use {{sharedip|OWNERNAME}}, or {{sharedipEDU|OWNERNAME}} if the shared IP is coming from an educational institution. You can find similar templates listed under Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. Hope that helps! - Loren 06:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks! I put the darn refs thingy in there for preview and forgot to take it out. D'oh. -- iMeowbot~ Meow 05:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
If you don't already, I recommend placing your userpage on your watchlist. You have a friend [1]. Yanksox 05:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
This article high energy weapon design is not about nuclear weapon design . It is about nuclear physics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmayes1965 ( talk • contribs)
It was, sorry I forgot to leave a message. VandalProof automatically sends "you are approved" messages, but Moderators have to manually place the declined notice, and I just forgot. Please request approval when you have reached 250 article edits. Thanks, and my apologies for my mistake. Prodego talk 21:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Ju66l3r/Archive 1, and thank you for your interest in VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!
Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{ User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (this also places the user box attached) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.
If you have any problems, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 07:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
You beat me to the revert :P Viridae Talk 03:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching an IP delete from my page. However, it was actually just me, not signed in. I would appreciate it if you removed the warning from my IP. Thank you. — The Mac Davis ⌇☢ ญƛ. 17:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
for the reverts to my userpage. It's really nice to see others looking out for my stuff =). Alphachimp talk 00:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to ditto Alaphachimps thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, it seems I have attracted a
dickhead. regards
DavidCane
23:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank for reverting my page. I appreciate it greatly. :) -- Coil 04:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
My page too. Altho it wasn't exactly vandalism, I'm amazed you noticed and got it fixed so soon. Thanks. Baiter 23:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting Cohen's Kappa, I hope it lasts.
Femto reverted your revert. And so it goes. Vigilantes rule.
How odd. When you go to their website, they are still live-feeding urban gospel over the internet...but for whatever reason, it's not actually their current playlist over the AM band (like most radio stations). Live and learn. Thanks for removing it after my reversion. ju66l3r 15:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
How can you go and say who is right and who is wrong? Man, I have earned my doctorate already, and you if anyone should be better than that. If you read the discussions those two are 100% hard headed against any outside discussion of who is included. They bully others, and when the tables are turned in the discussion, they run saying personal attacks. They are not protecting that page or protecting Wiki, they are protecting their ultra-Nationalistic ideas with regards to Germany and India. 71.106.195.5 08:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)