Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jeremy St. Louis has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bexample\.com' .
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot ( talk) 22:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
The article Jeremy St. Louis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- BLP unsourced since its creation in February 2007, yet another person who is of marginal notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bearian (
talk)
19:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Talk:Jeremy St. Louis
Hello Jstlouis16. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:Jeremy St. Louis, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not an article. Corresponding article is not eligible for A7 deletion either since it contains sufficient claims of signficance. Thank you. So Why 07:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jeremy St. Louis has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bexample\.com' .
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot ( talk) 22:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
The article Jeremy St. Louis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- BLP unsourced since its creation in February 2007, yet another person who is of marginal notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bearian (
talk)
19:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Talk:Jeremy St. Louis
Hello Jstlouis16. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:Jeremy St. Louis, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not an article. Corresponding article is not eligible for A7 deletion either since it contains sufficient claims of signficance. Thank you. So Why 07:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)