![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Block due vandalism 199.216.224.11 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Prodego talk 20:52, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Action please are you in?
Prodego talk 20:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
It takes much longer there(or at least the 3 or four times I did post there it did)
Prodego talk 21:04, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page! Grutness... wha? 01:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah I saw all thatbut I checked the log before re-added it and the only thing I saw was the 24 hour block that had expired. It must have been put on sometime right after I re-added it. Thanks though. Gator (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I need an admin. I am Bucephalus. I messing around with my monobook file, trying to make the navigation popups work. I broke it. Now I can't access my user name. Only admins and the user themselves can access the file. Please can you blank the file:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bucephalus/monobook.js
This should make it work. Thank you -- Bucephalus1 23:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Why did you remove my external link??? Who are you people and why do you feel that you can do this all the time. We have a legitimate magazine and it should be including alongside those other magazines as well. Do you work them??? What is the deal????
What do you mean by spamming? You think I'm going to spam people? Uh... I don't do stuff like that. I'm simply adding our link (just like they did) to increase awareness of other avenues other than these magazines. Actually, some of these magazines are linked on our site. They are no different to us.
ok I will blank it for you.
Hello Jredmond, Googie Man here, and I'm writing in case you're a baseball fan, as I noticed you made an edit on the Albert Pujols article. Jimbo and Angela have made a new webstie called Wikicities. This link in particular will take you to the baseball Wikicity. As you'll see it's similar to Wikipedia, but my hope is this will allow baseball fans to do more and different things, like reporting on games, in depth statistics, create mulitple pages for pictures, and whatever else baseball fans care to create. You've done great work on Wikipedia and I was hoping you could help get this baseball Wikicity off the ground. Please let me know what you think either at my talk page, or you can email me at terry@wikia.com. Thanks! Googie Man( Talk), 22:07, 4 January 2006
Yeah, thats what I intended...but I also gave up trying to edit that page after three of us tackled it. I wasn't aware it ever included my edit enough to let others see it. My bv is not needed in any case after your test2 and the test5 from whichever phoenix. :) -- Syrthiss 17:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
When reverting a user's vandalism, check their contributions and make sure the user hasn't vandalized other pages. freestylefrappe 18:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Please take a look at the talk page for 2019 regarding your edit. Thanks.
Time to make good on Test4-n with this anonymous user. I'd do it but am no admin. Bill 15:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm soliciting Wikipedia:Peer review#United States Bill of Rights comments from people who contributed to the FA on the 1st Amendment, since there doesn't seem to be any response at PR. Many thanks, Kaisershatner 21:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: the indefinite block of this IP and Johnleemk's blocklog comments - according to Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Expiry times and application the shortest block takes precedence. Vsmith's 48 h block was still 'active' and cancelled yours. As I understand it, it should have been lifted first. Femto 16:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Jredmond, I am beginning the process to create a wikiproject for Missouri. in order to do so i'm required to show that there is a base of at least 5-10 people who would be interested in contributing to such a project. the project would serve to aid in the creation and editing of articles related to the U.S. State Missouri, its cities, counties, geography, transportation, culture, history, education, and so on. It aims to expand Wikipedia's resources on Missouri in a fair and accurate manner. Since you're stated as being a wikipedian in missouri, i wanted to see if you were interested. if you are, please add your username at Wikipedia:Wikiproject/List_of_proposed_projects#Missouri and User:Preschooler.at.heart/Missouri. thanks for your consideration. -- preschooler. at .heart my talk - contribs 16:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Jim, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't unblock this user (per the blocking policy, however, feel free to discuss further). He or she is unquestionably connected to Israelbeach, and may be the same person, and contributed significantly to a situation in which a good editor and admin was harassed with legal and other threats. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
It's been three weeks since you unblocked the account for Bonnieisrael. In those three weeks, she has made the following contributions to Wikipedia:
Are these the kinds of edits you had in mind when you unblocked this user? In the meantime, Slimvirgin and I have both quit editing Wikipedia due to lack of support - but situations like this still rankle. I get derision and abuse heaped on me for tagging users like BonnieIsrael with "socksuspect" tags, no other administrator steps in to intervene; sock and meat puppets continue to multiply, no other administrator steps in to intervene. What happened to your promise to "keep an eye on her contribs"? I've been telling myself that I should simply stop caring, but like a bad scab, I can't stop picking at it. Ultimately, it's not the POV-pushers and self-promoters who upset me, for predictably taking advantage of holes in the system - it's admins like you, who continue giving them the means to do so. -- woggly 06:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Good to see my block wasn't unprecidented, thanks for adding your's on. Only thing, I was noticing you blocked them indef. Would it be alright if we transfer it to being renewed annually, after consultation with the school board. Just to make sure their policy decisions don't change in the mean time. -- Zanimum 19:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting in my RfA! <blush> at those comments btw... The nom didn't gain consensus, but still happy I accepted it. Thanks again! - Amgine 20:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
I see that you have blocked the public library system in New Zealand of all places.
I think that you should know, as I put on Gadfium's page too that there is more to the Aidan blocking than meets the eye. Thank you. Kind regards. Wallie 19:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
--- I got involved with the Ian Paisley article, and these three people, especially Kiand took a very POV stance. I was just trying to improve the heavy POV in it. I am not particularly for or against Paisley, but like to see that the article is a true representation of the person. Kiand in particular was always trying to wind people up, espeically Aidan. Aidan obviously "lost it" which gave someone the excuse to ban him. Kiand is still trying to annoy him on his talk page, even though he is banned. I see that you mentioned it was Jdirl. I really think that this sort of thing is not good for Wikipedia, and wanted you to know. Wallie 19:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC) ---
Due to Wikipedia's popularity on search engines, sites that were never on or contributed to Wiki were coming in looking for mere advertising. You removed all the useful links on the site that had been there from the start of this article. Due to damaging actions such as link url tampering and text description altering by ONE set of people trying to advertise for a site called "****" (check logs in History) I assume you took the action of removing everything. Not all of those were fansites. The checklist you also removed is a useful resource I linked to and found informative. I also contribute to Wikipedia when I have computer access. I do not think it right that you remove all links due to the action of one set of people who were only here to advertise for their personal site. I found coming here and reading and being able to read info on the linked sites here on Wikipedia useful and to damage a useful resource because of the vanadlism of possibly one person is wrong.
hi there. in case you missed it, i thought you might like to know AIDS is appearing on the main page as a featured article on June 15th (this month). if you could, it'd prolly help to have someone keeping an eye out for vandals specifically on that date, since as of right now there is at least one vandalizing a day since it's FA status. now would also be a good time to copyedit it before the big slam on its main page day. :) JoeSmack Talk 16:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
You overturned an indefinite block of Bonnieisrael ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in May. Since then, the account has made no or few useful edits, and has now apparently started causing problems again for User:Woggly, which is why I blocked in the first place. You said you would keep an eye on the situation, so can I ask that you look into it? The harassment of Woggly was serious, coming from Bonnieisrael as well as sockpuppets/meatpuppets/friends, and involved real-life harassment too, and various legal threats. It therefore can't be allowed to start up again. Report from Woggly here. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
This appears to be an attempt to censor User:Bonnieisrael as she does not agree with User:Woggly. Do we simply censor and block those users who civily and kindly disagree with user:slimvirgin and user:woggly? Has it ever occured that User:Woggly has been abusive and harassed and stalked several users including User:Israelbeach? What were User:Woggly's last ten edits? Who did they focus on?That should answer any questions or doubts. Keep Wiki free of censorship and abuse. Lennys 10:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your attention to the recent vandalism on my User and Talk pages. Best wishes. WBardwin 05:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
-- Lmbstl 12:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. -- WikiInquirer 23:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC) talk to me
Hi hear you were on the Radio 4 Today programme this morning, and a friend said you came across very well. Well done and thank you for making Wikipedia look good. Cheers Lethaniol 16:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you came across very well in both the BBC and ABC interviews. Good Job! -- 67.166.92.174 08:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Oh look, that is me at the top of the page. That sure is a coincidence. Anyway, could you take a look at this please? This should verify I am me too. Prodego talk 03:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
See exchange here: User talk:Bastique#Live_Prayer_with_Bill_Keller. Love, Cary Bass demandez 12:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Quarl is done updating {{ coord}} and adding additional backwards compatibility. Please see his summary at Template_talk:Coord#Updates and comment there. We'll now need to look at how this works for wikicode parsers. I think he's done a great job. Andy Mabbett 11:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Jim Thorpe is up for FAR, I tried my best to help out but it still needs work maybe you can take a look if you have time there's a link to the FAR on the article's talk page. Quadzilla99 22:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
You might want to consider protecting that page per this thread. Satu rday Contribs 17:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
I was looking for the article on Doug Rokke that you deleted. Could you possibly reconsider? I recall seeing it before, and do not remember it being a thinly-veiled attack. Rokke does say some very controversial things about his own qualifications/history, and it is extremely important because he portrays himself as an expert on depleted uranium munitions.
Wiki says "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion."
If you will not reconsider, could you please email me the article? Was there a talk on the deletion that I can look at?
Many thanks, Jim Hoerner Jim hoerner 18:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a
deletion review of
Doug_Rokke. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Jim hoerner
21:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Actually, and I don't mean to be rude here, I think you should research how range blocks work a little more, before responding to such complaints. Just because the user complaining of collateral didn't understand how IPs and blocking works, doesn't mean that you should assume their interpretation is more correct than the experienced checkuser that applied the block. Dmcdevit· t 00:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jredmond. See 64.9.10.166 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). You're the most recent administrator to issue a long-term block for this school IP, which belongs to Tredyffrin Easttown School District. I just fixed some blatant vandalism of Vitamin A that came from this IP, and I saw the big header comment on the IP Talk page about a consented block. Is it worth writing to the school's web site administrator to see if the block should be renewed for another year? I see that their web site provides an email address for the administrator. EdJohnston 13:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I'm sending you this message since you were involved in the August 2005 survey on year pages. As I don't know if you've gathered, somebody has been fighting for a change to the house style on how to notate multiple events on the same date. A discussion is currently in progress - your contribution would be appreciated! -- Smjg ( talk) 15:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You may have seen that some Wikipedia articles lack sources to given dates, timelines and chronologies.
If you feel that you could like to help in making all articles more reliable and well sourced in this regard, we would like to encourage you to use, as part of your daily editing and when {{
fact}} is not enough for requesting clearly and specifically a citation or source for dates, timeline or chronology, the following inline tag:
At
WP Timeline Tracer, we thank you for using these tools and for helping to make Wikipedia articles more accurate and reliable.
Dao ken 10:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I see that you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Time. How do you think, can decade ( 0s) consist of nine years?! I suppose that it is nonsense and WP:CFORK (because it is possible for somebody to create parallel categories: Category:First decade of 1st century for years 1-10 and so on). If this was a convention, can you indicate the source of that idea? Thanks.-- ChroniclerSPb ( talk) 19:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Time Times |
![]() |
Issue One • March 2008 •
About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier | ||
News
| ||
Archives • Newsroom | ||
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name
here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}. |
Hi, I am new and have made this trouble! You succeed in annulling the "User Talk: Davide1268" from the page " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Swiss_singer-songwriters "? This is not useful and him is inserted for an error.
Pardon for the error.
Davide1268 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davide1268 ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Time Times |
![]() |
Issue Two • April 2008 •
About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier | ||
News
| ||
Archives • Newsroom | ||
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name
here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}. |
On Feb 8, 2008, you speedy deleted the article on Digimarc Corporation as advertising, which was a good call. I want to take a shot at creating an encyclopedic article for Digimarc Corporation, basically scapping everything in the previous article except the info box and parts of the introductory paragraph and re-writing the article using mostly independent sources. Do you know in these cases if it is better to restore the previous article (to keep the edit history) and then rewrite it or should I write it like a new article? I would appreciate your thoughts. -Regards Nv8200p talk 03:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
this is a wiki that I made. Can you please help me with this project?? thanks. Sternhe ( talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sternhe ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
If you can add the measurements back for the Stephanie Adams article upon taking a look at this reliable source on Playboy.com: Playboy.com: Stephanie Adams, that (along with her confirmed date of birth from her official web sites) would be sufficient.
Being that it's on Playboy.com as well as her Playboy magazine's data sheet, it is a fact. So why are these people trying to remove information that has been public since her November 1992 centerfold?
Again, why not remove all of the measurements of all of the playmates, since they want to be so discriminatory against this one? Swiksek ( talk) 23:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Re [1] - sorry, got lost in the rush. What does it do? William M. Connolley ( talk) 21:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Time Times |
![]() |
Issue Three • May 2008 •
About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier | ||
News
| ||
Archives • Newsroom | ||
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name
here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}. |
Were there any women in the project besides Angela back in 2004? It's so much more confusing now. ;)
I have a question, you being someone who I assume pays more attention to trends and politics than I. Is the response to SupportPublicTV normal these days, e.g. speedy deletion of the spiel s/he put up followed by a username block for daring to put up links to relevant content that you own, as encouraged on the Pump? It seems excessive to me but, then again, I didn't see the harm in the corrections and tweaks originating from User:USSTRATCOM PAO way back before MyWikiBiz, so the community may have just passed me by on this issue while I was busy not watching the project pages over the past couple years. Cheers, Banyan Tree 22:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Block due vandalism 199.216.224.11 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Prodego talk 20:52, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Action please are you in?
Prodego talk 20:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
It takes much longer there(or at least the 3 or four times I did post there it did)
Prodego talk 21:04, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page! Grutness... wha? 01:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah I saw all thatbut I checked the log before re-added it and the only thing I saw was the 24 hour block that had expired. It must have been put on sometime right after I re-added it. Thanks though. Gator (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I need an admin. I am Bucephalus. I messing around with my monobook file, trying to make the navigation popups work. I broke it. Now I can't access my user name. Only admins and the user themselves can access the file. Please can you blank the file:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bucephalus/monobook.js
This should make it work. Thank you -- Bucephalus1 23:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Why did you remove my external link??? Who are you people and why do you feel that you can do this all the time. We have a legitimate magazine and it should be including alongside those other magazines as well. Do you work them??? What is the deal????
What do you mean by spamming? You think I'm going to spam people? Uh... I don't do stuff like that. I'm simply adding our link (just like they did) to increase awareness of other avenues other than these magazines. Actually, some of these magazines are linked on our site. They are no different to us.
ok I will blank it for you.
Hello Jredmond, Googie Man here, and I'm writing in case you're a baseball fan, as I noticed you made an edit on the Albert Pujols article. Jimbo and Angela have made a new webstie called Wikicities. This link in particular will take you to the baseball Wikicity. As you'll see it's similar to Wikipedia, but my hope is this will allow baseball fans to do more and different things, like reporting on games, in depth statistics, create mulitple pages for pictures, and whatever else baseball fans care to create. You've done great work on Wikipedia and I was hoping you could help get this baseball Wikicity off the ground. Please let me know what you think either at my talk page, or you can email me at terry@wikia.com. Thanks! Googie Man( Talk), 22:07, 4 January 2006
Yeah, thats what I intended...but I also gave up trying to edit that page after three of us tackled it. I wasn't aware it ever included my edit enough to let others see it. My bv is not needed in any case after your test2 and the test5 from whichever phoenix. :) -- Syrthiss 17:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
When reverting a user's vandalism, check their contributions and make sure the user hasn't vandalized other pages. freestylefrappe 18:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Please take a look at the talk page for 2019 regarding your edit. Thanks.
Time to make good on Test4-n with this anonymous user. I'd do it but am no admin. Bill 15:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm soliciting Wikipedia:Peer review#United States Bill of Rights comments from people who contributed to the FA on the 1st Amendment, since there doesn't seem to be any response at PR. Many thanks, Kaisershatner 21:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: the indefinite block of this IP and Johnleemk's blocklog comments - according to Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Expiry times and application the shortest block takes precedence. Vsmith's 48 h block was still 'active' and cancelled yours. As I understand it, it should have been lifted first. Femto 16:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Jredmond, I am beginning the process to create a wikiproject for Missouri. in order to do so i'm required to show that there is a base of at least 5-10 people who would be interested in contributing to such a project. the project would serve to aid in the creation and editing of articles related to the U.S. State Missouri, its cities, counties, geography, transportation, culture, history, education, and so on. It aims to expand Wikipedia's resources on Missouri in a fair and accurate manner. Since you're stated as being a wikipedian in missouri, i wanted to see if you were interested. if you are, please add your username at Wikipedia:Wikiproject/List_of_proposed_projects#Missouri and User:Preschooler.at.heart/Missouri. thanks for your consideration. -- preschooler. at .heart my talk - contribs 16:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Jim, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't unblock this user (per the blocking policy, however, feel free to discuss further). He or she is unquestionably connected to Israelbeach, and may be the same person, and contributed significantly to a situation in which a good editor and admin was harassed with legal and other threats. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
It's been three weeks since you unblocked the account for Bonnieisrael. In those three weeks, she has made the following contributions to Wikipedia:
Are these the kinds of edits you had in mind when you unblocked this user? In the meantime, Slimvirgin and I have both quit editing Wikipedia due to lack of support - but situations like this still rankle. I get derision and abuse heaped on me for tagging users like BonnieIsrael with "socksuspect" tags, no other administrator steps in to intervene; sock and meat puppets continue to multiply, no other administrator steps in to intervene. What happened to your promise to "keep an eye on her contribs"? I've been telling myself that I should simply stop caring, but like a bad scab, I can't stop picking at it. Ultimately, it's not the POV-pushers and self-promoters who upset me, for predictably taking advantage of holes in the system - it's admins like you, who continue giving them the means to do so. -- woggly 06:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Good to see my block wasn't unprecidented, thanks for adding your's on. Only thing, I was noticing you blocked them indef. Would it be alright if we transfer it to being renewed annually, after consultation with the school board. Just to make sure their policy decisions don't change in the mean time. -- Zanimum 19:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting in my RfA! <blush> at those comments btw... The nom didn't gain consensus, but still happy I accepted it. Thanks again! - Amgine 20:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
I see that you have blocked the public library system in New Zealand of all places.
I think that you should know, as I put on Gadfium's page too that there is more to the Aidan blocking than meets the eye. Thank you. Kind regards. Wallie 19:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
--- I got involved with the Ian Paisley article, and these three people, especially Kiand took a very POV stance. I was just trying to improve the heavy POV in it. I am not particularly for or against Paisley, but like to see that the article is a true representation of the person. Kiand in particular was always trying to wind people up, espeically Aidan. Aidan obviously "lost it" which gave someone the excuse to ban him. Kiand is still trying to annoy him on his talk page, even though he is banned. I see that you mentioned it was Jdirl. I really think that this sort of thing is not good for Wikipedia, and wanted you to know. Wallie 19:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC) ---
Due to Wikipedia's popularity on search engines, sites that were never on or contributed to Wiki were coming in looking for mere advertising. You removed all the useful links on the site that had been there from the start of this article. Due to damaging actions such as link url tampering and text description altering by ONE set of people trying to advertise for a site called "****" (check logs in History) I assume you took the action of removing everything. Not all of those were fansites. The checklist you also removed is a useful resource I linked to and found informative. I also contribute to Wikipedia when I have computer access. I do not think it right that you remove all links due to the action of one set of people who were only here to advertise for their personal site. I found coming here and reading and being able to read info on the linked sites here on Wikipedia useful and to damage a useful resource because of the vanadlism of possibly one person is wrong.
hi there. in case you missed it, i thought you might like to know AIDS is appearing on the main page as a featured article on June 15th (this month). if you could, it'd prolly help to have someone keeping an eye out for vandals specifically on that date, since as of right now there is at least one vandalizing a day since it's FA status. now would also be a good time to copyedit it before the big slam on its main page day. :) JoeSmack Talk 16:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
You overturned an indefinite block of Bonnieisrael ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in May. Since then, the account has made no or few useful edits, and has now apparently started causing problems again for User:Woggly, which is why I blocked in the first place. You said you would keep an eye on the situation, so can I ask that you look into it? The harassment of Woggly was serious, coming from Bonnieisrael as well as sockpuppets/meatpuppets/friends, and involved real-life harassment too, and various legal threats. It therefore can't be allowed to start up again. Report from Woggly here. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
This appears to be an attempt to censor User:Bonnieisrael as she does not agree with User:Woggly. Do we simply censor and block those users who civily and kindly disagree with user:slimvirgin and user:woggly? Has it ever occured that User:Woggly has been abusive and harassed and stalked several users including User:Israelbeach? What were User:Woggly's last ten edits? Who did they focus on?That should answer any questions or doubts. Keep Wiki free of censorship and abuse. Lennys 10:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your attention to the recent vandalism on my User and Talk pages. Best wishes. WBardwin 05:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
-- Lmbstl 12:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. -- WikiInquirer 23:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC) talk to me
Hi hear you were on the Radio 4 Today programme this morning, and a friend said you came across very well. Well done and thank you for making Wikipedia look good. Cheers Lethaniol 16:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you came across very well in both the BBC and ABC interviews. Good Job! -- 67.166.92.174 08:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Oh look, that is me at the top of the page. That sure is a coincidence. Anyway, could you take a look at this please? This should verify I am me too. Prodego talk 03:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
See exchange here: User talk:Bastique#Live_Prayer_with_Bill_Keller. Love, Cary Bass demandez 12:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Quarl is done updating {{ coord}} and adding additional backwards compatibility. Please see his summary at Template_talk:Coord#Updates and comment there. We'll now need to look at how this works for wikicode parsers. I think he's done a great job. Andy Mabbett 11:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Jim Thorpe is up for FAR, I tried my best to help out but it still needs work maybe you can take a look if you have time there's a link to the FAR on the article's talk page. Quadzilla99 22:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
You might want to consider protecting that page per this thread. Satu rday Contribs 17:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
I was looking for the article on Doug Rokke that you deleted. Could you possibly reconsider? I recall seeing it before, and do not remember it being a thinly-veiled attack. Rokke does say some very controversial things about his own qualifications/history, and it is extremely important because he portrays himself as an expert on depleted uranium munitions.
Wiki says "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion."
If you will not reconsider, could you please email me the article? Was there a talk on the deletion that I can look at?
Many thanks, Jim Hoerner Jim hoerner 18:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a
deletion review of
Doug_Rokke. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Jim hoerner
21:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Actually, and I don't mean to be rude here, I think you should research how range blocks work a little more, before responding to such complaints. Just because the user complaining of collateral didn't understand how IPs and blocking works, doesn't mean that you should assume their interpretation is more correct than the experienced checkuser that applied the block. Dmcdevit· t 00:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jredmond. See 64.9.10.166 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). You're the most recent administrator to issue a long-term block for this school IP, which belongs to Tredyffrin Easttown School District. I just fixed some blatant vandalism of Vitamin A that came from this IP, and I saw the big header comment on the IP Talk page about a consented block. Is it worth writing to the school's web site administrator to see if the block should be renewed for another year? I see that their web site provides an email address for the administrator. EdJohnston 13:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I'm sending you this message since you were involved in the August 2005 survey on year pages. As I don't know if you've gathered, somebody has been fighting for a change to the house style on how to notate multiple events on the same date. A discussion is currently in progress - your contribution would be appreciated! -- Smjg ( talk) 15:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You may have seen that some Wikipedia articles lack sources to given dates, timelines and chronologies.
If you feel that you could like to help in making all articles more reliable and well sourced in this regard, we would like to encourage you to use, as part of your daily editing and when {{
fact}} is not enough for requesting clearly and specifically a citation or source for dates, timeline or chronology, the following inline tag:
At
WP Timeline Tracer, we thank you for using these tools and for helping to make Wikipedia articles more accurate and reliable.
Dao ken 10:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I see that you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Time. How do you think, can decade ( 0s) consist of nine years?! I suppose that it is nonsense and WP:CFORK (because it is possible for somebody to create parallel categories: Category:First decade of 1st century for years 1-10 and so on). If this was a convention, can you indicate the source of that idea? Thanks.-- ChroniclerSPb ( talk) 19:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Time Times |
![]() |
Issue One • March 2008 •
About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier | ||
News
| ||
Archives • Newsroom | ||
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name
here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}. |
Hi, I am new and have made this trouble! You succeed in annulling the "User Talk: Davide1268" from the page " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Swiss_singer-songwriters "? This is not useful and him is inserted for an error.
Pardon for the error.
Davide1268 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davide1268 ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Time Times |
![]() |
Issue Two • April 2008 •
About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier | ||
News
| ||
Archives • Newsroom | ||
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name
here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}. |
On Feb 8, 2008, you speedy deleted the article on Digimarc Corporation as advertising, which was a good call. I want to take a shot at creating an encyclopedic article for Digimarc Corporation, basically scapping everything in the previous article except the info box and parts of the introductory paragraph and re-writing the article using mostly independent sources. Do you know in these cases if it is better to restore the previous article (to keep the edit history) and then rewrite it or should I write it like a new article? I would appreciate your thoughts. -Regards Nv8200p talk 03:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
this is a wiki that I made. Can you please help me with this project?? thanks. Sternhe ( talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sternhe ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
If you can add the measurements back for the Stephanie Adams article upon taking a look at this reliable source on Playboy.com: Playboy.com: Stephanie Adams, that (along with her confirmed date of birth from her official web sites) would be sufficient.
Being that it's on Playboy.com as well as her Playboy magazine's data sheet, it is a fact. So why are these people trying to remove information that has been public since her November 1992 centerfold?
Again, why not remove all of the measurements of all of the playmates, since they want to be so discriminatory against this one? Swiksek ( talk) 23:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Re [1] - sorry, got lost in the rush. What does it do? William M. Connolley ( talk) 21:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Time Times |
![]() |
Issue Three • May 2008 •
About the Newsletter Written by FrankP and Template Designed by Diligent Terrier | ||
News
| ||
Archives • Newsroom | ||
If you no longer wish to longer receive this newsletter, please add your name
here. Newsletter delivered by {{{Delivered by}}}. |
Were there any women in the project besides Angela back in 2004? It's so much more confusing now. ;)
I have a question, you being someone who I assume pays more attention to trends and politics than I. Is the response to SupportPublicTV normal these days, e.g. speedy deletion of the spiel s/he put up followed by a username block for daring to put up links to relevant content that you own, as encouraged on the Pump? It seems excessive to me but, then again, I didn't see the harm in the corrections and tweaks originating from User:USSTRATCOM PAO way back before MyWikiBiz, so the community may have just passed me by on this issue while I was busy not watching the project pages over the past couple years. Cheers, Banyan Tree 22:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |