Fruitful discussion is fine not argument ~~
Hi Joshi punekar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, Please let me know what I can do to help. I already changed the quote as you requested. Thanks Acharya63 ( talk) 19:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Joshi punekar. After being blocked per WP:AN3 earlier this month, I notice you are continuing to revert at Saraswat Brahmin about the best way to describe their diet, with respect to their consumption of fish. You are risking a block the next time you revert this article unless you have obtained a prior consensus for your version on the article talk page. Since you appear to be rejecting all feedback about your edits, an administrator should go ahead with an indefinite block of your account if you continue to edit war. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
EdJohnston Sometimes it hurts when they revert without given proper reason.Ex: see Deshasthas brahmin page:Instead of reverting recent edit some user have reverted all 5 edits,How pathetic. Secondly in saraswat Brahmin page recent edits don’t match any citations that’s what I mentioned even there it got reverted without any information sharing!! What’s happening in wiki? Even my time is important for me if they keep on reverting the hard earned information what’s the use? (I really don’t except too much just go through above 2 page then you will understand what’s happening) Joshi punekar ( talk) 19:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
If I proved wrong about my above claim happily I’ll delete my account.So I request you to go through deshasthas page only once. Joshi punekar ( talk) 19:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
∯WBG converse 19:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Your previous 24-hour block from 10 April was for edit warring at Goud Saraswat Brahmin per a complaint at WP:AN3. Since the original AN3 complaint, your reverts about Brahmins have not ceased and you seem unable or unwilling to wait for consensus on the talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 19:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshi punekar. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
Fruitful discussion is fine not argument ~~
Hi Joshi punekar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, Please let me know what I can do to help. I already changed the quote as you requested. Thanks Acharya63 ( talk) 19:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Joshi punekar. After being blocked per WP:AN3 earlier this month, I notice you are continuing to revert at Saraswat Brahmin about the best way to describe their diet, with respect to their consumption of fish. You are risking a block the next time you revert this article unless you have obtained a prior consensus for your version on the article talk page. Since you appear to be rejecting all feedback about your edits, an administrator should go ahead with an indefinite block of your account if you continue to edit war. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
EdJohnston Sometimes it hurts when they revert without given proper reason.Ex: see Deshasthas brahmin page:Instead of reverting recent edit some user have reverted all 5 edits,How pathetic. Secondly in saraswat Brahmin page recent edits don’t match any citations that’s what I mentioned even there it got reverted without any information sharing!! What’s happening in wiki? Even my time is important for me if they keep on reverting the hard earned information what’s the use? (I really don’t except too much just go through above 2 page then you will understand what’s happening) Joshi punekar ( talk) 19:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
If I proved wrong about my above claim happily I’ll delete my account.So I request you to go through deshasthas page only once. Joshi punekar ( talk) 19:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
∯WBG converse 19:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Your previous 24-hour block from 10 April was for edit warring at Goud Saraswat Brahmin per a complaint at WP:AN3. Since the original AN3 complaint, your reverts about Brahmins have not ceased and you seem unable or unwilling to wait for consensus on the talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 19:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshi punekar. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |