One of your previous edits contained information that has previously resulted in a copyright violation. If you think any of your other additions are copyrighted then please remove it. Cheers, Pokerplayer513 ( talk) 23:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Freedom for Humanity Facebook exchange.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally reverted your edit. Mea culpa. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 21:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish Thanks for letting me know. Yes, I thought that might be it. Jontel ( talk) 21:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish Thanks for that. Yes, I can see emotions run deep. I thought your examples added a real life dimension that wan't there before. Jontel ( talk) 22:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
I've answered here.Cheers Nishidani ( talk) 13:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
You broke 1rr with diff kindly self revert. As a side note - challenging published academic sources (whose subject is the article) on the basis of your personal WP:OR is not a good look. Icewhiz ( talk) 21:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
In particular, this edit, in contravention to Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party/Archive 7#RfC.13 Howard Jacobson is against an established RfC consensus. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Just a note to say thank you for your ongoing work to improve the quality, accuracy and sources of articles. ~ BOD ~ TALK 23:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
One of your previous edits contained information that has previously resulted in a copyright violation. If you think any of your other additions are copyrighted then please remove it. Cheers, Pokerplayer513 ( talk) 23:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Freedom for Humanity Facebook exchange.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally reverted your edit. Mea culpa. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 21:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish Thanks for letting me know. Yes, I thought that might be it. Jontel ( talk) 21:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish Thanks for that. Yes, I can see emotions run deep. I thought your examples added a real life dimension that wan't there before. Jontel ( talk) 22:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
I've answered here.Cheers Nishidani ( talk) 13:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
You broke 1rr with diff kindly self revert. As a side note - challenging published academic sources (whose subject is the article) on the basis of your personal WP:OR is not a good look. Icewhiz ( talk) 21:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
In particular, this edit, in contravention to Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party/Archive 7#RfC.13 Howard Jacobson is against an established RfC consensus. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Just a note to say thank you for your ongoing work to improve the quality, accuracy and sources of articles. ~ BOD ~ TALK 23:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)