|
If you are interested in working on MMA articles in a Wiki type format, visit MMA Wikia -- Boston2austin ( talk) 18:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm gunna join. Just let me know what you guys need help with. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 03:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
— cyberpower ChatOffline 06:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UFC on Fox: Shogun vs. Vera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC on Fox: Shogun vs. Vera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king (edits) 07:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Bones. I don't disagree with putting Chris Leben on the list, but to answer your question, some people doubt his chin because of his fight with Anderson... Of course, it's not like getting KTFO by him isn't a norm or anything. -- TheShadowCrow ( talk) 22:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Anderson can KO anyone... Chris Leben has shown an iron chin in many fights. And btw why is Chuck Liddell on both lists. His chin is clearly one of the weak ones! JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 05:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Yeah that's what I said. And Liddell used to have an iron chin. It's a good example of how damage can affect a fighter's chin. -- TheShadowCrow ( talk) 15:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Just curious, what fights did he show an iron chin in? I'm curious. I wanna see them. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 16:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Tito, Landi-Jons, Metzger, Vitor, Overeem, and in the first Rampage fight he got hit hard on the chin at least 8-9 times, was staggered but never went down. -- TheShadowCrow ( talk) 21:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
I see, nice! JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 01:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Glad to see that have publicly mentioned it now, not that it makes it any less of a mess. Appreciate all of the work you've been doing on the MMA pages. Keep it up! Udar55 ( talk) 13:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I see that you do a lot of edits of the ufc event pages. I just want to ask you if you do edit a page, you type in the summary what you changed exactly. Then others can see what has changed. Thanks in advance ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiMntjMMA ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Well it does show what was changed anyway. But I try to put summary in everytime I can. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 20:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!
Kevlar ( talk) 00:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 01:58, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
I am just asking why you have taken the original birth place of Jimi Manuwa to replaced them with mistakes by the UFC. You have made the article contradict itself, there is no reference to him being from Sacramento e.g 'Jimi, who moved to England from Nigeria when he was ten, says he has been frustrated and angry ever since he was young.' You can see you have made the article contradict itself. Also considering the fact they have spelled his name 'Poster Boiy' wrong on the website, doesn't help the credibility. Please don't everything that the UFC says for gosppel. Revert the 'vandalism' you made please.
I took a look at the History of many UFC articles, and I saw that you are one of the most prominent contributors.
The fight was announced as a TKO by the announcer, please do not change it. -- Willdawg111 ( talk) 02:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
The announcer made a mistake, Joe Rogan and Mike GOldberg make mistakes all the time. This reliable source says a KO.
http://www.sherdog.com/events/BFC-Bellator-Fighting-Championships-78-25211
Plus watching the fight you could tell it was a KO. You also failed to leave a method. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 02:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Then you should provide a reliable source saying so instead of engaging in an edit war. I am using this as a reliable source: http://www.sherdog.com/events/BFC-Bellator-Fighting-Championships-78-25211
Also this looks like it's not the 1st time you have been warned about edit warring. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 02:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Please present the link. I have commented on the Bellator pages talk section. Until then we shall go off the reliable source of sherdog.com JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 02:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKFasLXEyAY Look at the 2:02 mark.
It was a TKO, thanks.-- Willdawg111 ( talk) 02:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry but the UFC is not a WP:RS, it does not have a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" in this case it has a vested interest in bending reality to help it's marketing. If you disagree feel free to take it to the WP:RS/N. Mt king (edits) 22:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Please don't make changes to the notability lists without discussing them on the talk page. The criteria used were discussed at WT:MMANOT and then objectively applied. They are also clearly stated in the text at WP:MMANOT. Being top tier for one gender does not automatically mean it's top tier for the other gender. Obvious example: Invicta is just for female fighters, so claiming top tier status for male fighters would be ludicrous. Papaursa ( talk) 01:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Again, please stop making additions to the notable organizations without consensus. Currently there have been no UFC women's fights. It's quite possible that the UFC may become a top tier women's organization, but there are objective criteria to be met. Right now adding the UFC to the women's list is WP:CRYSTALBALL. Papaursa ( talk) 20:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Your AfD submissions are coming out a little strange - please read the How to nominate a single page for deletion on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Right now they are not titled or added to the log page. I fixed a few. Peter Rehse ( talk) 08:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
What you did at User_talk:Mtking#Warning_for_Vandalism_and_content_removal is an inappropriate use of the warning templates. Regardless of whether or not Mtking's edits at List of current UFC fighters are appropriate for the content of the article, they are not vandalism. See Wikipedia:VAND#Boldly_editing and Wikipedia:VAND#Incorrect_wiki_markup_and_style. If you continue to inappropriately warn users, I will block you. MBisanz talk 06:38, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm just saying, I have seen alot of discrimination against MMA editors on wikipedia, which is bad for the site. The UFC 155 deletion without reason by Kww was a prime example. We proved that the event was notable with policy based reasons, citing the fact there was a Heavyweight Title fight at the event, and it was still unjustly deleted. That is an example of bias toward on wikipedia. I am also not for ANYONE who uses personal attacks, whether they are an MMA editor or a deletionist. However I feel alot of those personal attacks stem from provocation and discrimination of MMA editors. I just hope you guys realize that the problem is NOT MMA on wikipedia, it is Mtking on wikipedia. There was no issue and all was quiet and running smooth til he came back after his 1st attempt to destroy us. I fear the sanctions will be one sided against MMA editors. I believe wikipedia should be unbiased, it was made for the people after all. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 22:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Please note that this is not a template message, there is no red stop sign, it is intended to be a polite observation that after it has been pointed out to you by three editors here, here and here (and this could be classed as the fourth, plus other edit sums on articles such as this one) that the RfC at WT:MMA#RFC on WP:MMA's use of Flag Icons in relation to MOS:FLAG covers the addition of flags in both tables and lists when relating to UFC/MMA. Any continual action along thoes lines is likely to be viewed as disruptive and or Poninty editing, I urge you to be cautious as that road will lead you to a bad place. Mt king (edits) 07:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
a) UFC is not a WP:RS and b) nothing on the UFC's home page says it is a governing body or a competition between countries. Mt king (edits) 08:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The word "source" as used on Wikipedia has three related meanings:
the piece of work itself (the article, book),"
Actually is a WP:RS. And http://www.ufc.com/program if you flip thru those pages you will see the flag and name of each country's competitor, and a brief discription of their stats on the other pages. Read up! JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 08:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Please read the explanation. AfD doesn't apply for redirects. They are deleted along with the main article latter on. Peter Rehse ( talk) 08:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! I don't think there is any policy against noting it in the AfD, but it doesn't count for anything. It's not an argument against voiding the AfD or keeping the article in any way in this case. Bjelleklang - talk 08:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. Just a note that you must not remove declined unblock requests regarding your blocks. -- LlamaAl ( talk) 06:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Some people seem to be confused about how to catagorize MMA fights. You are definitely not the only one, but since you are trying to get so many pages deleted that are actually notable, I wanted to make sure you understood. If you look at WP:NMMA, it only requires fights for notability to be put on by a top tier organization and be professional. All legal MMA fights in the US are done at 3 levels, toughman, amateur, or professional. Once you are a professional, you can not got back down to amateur to compete. Every single fighter on TUF, is a professional fighter, and every single fight on TUF is legal and sanctioned by the NSAC. When they call them exhibition fights, they only mean that they have worked out a deal where they don't have to report them to the ABC to be immediately put on the record. They did this because you could go to a person's record and create a bracket of who won and who loss if they didn't do that. It doesn't mean that they aren't professional and put on by a top tier, which is all that is required to be notable by WP:NMMA. If you personally have an issue with TUF fights being used, then I would suggest trying to get the guidelines changed, but as of now, quite a few of those articles should never have been recomended per WP:NMMA. Until such a time exists, that the guidelines are changed, please follow them. Thanks. And feel free to delete this if you want, because if you do delete it, then you are acknowledging that you read it and understand it. Willdawg111 ( talk) 15:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
You are missing the point. There is nothing that says exhibition bouts don't count. Since an exhibition bout can still be a professional fight and can still be put on by a top tier organization, Professional exhibition bouts you see put on by the UFC (which is what TUF fights are) still fall into the guidelines setup by WP:NMMA. You and a couple other people keep hanging onto the word exhibition and as far as the guidelines go, it's irrelevant. Willdawg111 ( talk) 03:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
One warning, and only one. You cannot say that the result of the MMA discussion applied only to results tables. In fact, the discussion itself covered the use of flags in general. Furthermore, the whole point of the RfC was just to affirm that MOS:FLAG applied in its restrictive sense to MMA articles. If you add flags or revert someone else's removal of flags from an MMA article I will block you. And it will be for a sizable length of time. Qwyrxian ( talk) 07:47, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is JonnyBonesJones. Thank you. Qwyrxian ( talk)
As far as the definition of passive-aggressive behavior goes, it's easy enough to find if you're willing to look outside your hermetically sealed world. Like, say, here:
Passive aggressive behavior can manifest itself as learned helplessness, procrastination, hostility masquerading as jokes, stubbornness, resentment, sullenness, or deliberate/repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is (often explicitly) responsible -- Calton | Talk 21:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Per the approved Wikipedia:General_sanctions in MMA related areas, and as I am an uninvolved admin, you are hereby placed on restriction from editing any flag in any article on Wikipedia, including non-MMA articles, for a period of 6 months including adding flags to MMA articles you create. You may continue to discuss the matter of flags on article talk pages. Anymore disruption or bad faith accusations in this topic area will result in stricter restrictions or a block.--v/r - T P 18:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. (
✉→
BWilkins
←✎) 22:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
TParis and Biwilkins are good admin. They do not do sanctions lightly. There seems to be no reason for any appeals etc. and I firmly believe you are doing yourself and the community a service by accepting sanctions in a reasonable fashion. When you return, this editor (me ) is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
As a courtesy, I am leaving the options that I referred to, that you may not know about. Please do not see this as a suggestion to appeal. It is not. I am offering only what little I know about these matters to show that there are always options, but the one you chose is the best path in this case.
Options when you feel an sanction or block was unjustified (not the case here)
|
---|
|
-- Amadscientist ( talk) 09:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
I have had it with all this anal nonsense. I'm most likely gunna be blocked as a martyr for MMA on wikipedia. If anyone who is part of the MMA project is sick of all the bullshit from Mtking and Hasteur and the anal admins, please join me at the true MMA wikipedia:
http://mmawiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
Thanks everyone. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 14:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
<Personal attacks, attempted outing, etc, redacted> -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 14:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
If you are interested in working on MMA articles in a Wiki type format, visit MMA Wikia -- Boston2austin ( talk) 18:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm gunna join. Just let me know what you guys need help with. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 03:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
— cyberpower ChatOffline 06:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UFC on Fox: Shogun vs. Vera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC on Fox: Shogun vs. Vera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king (edits) 07:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Bones. I don't disagree with putting Chris Leben on the list, but to answer your question, some people doubt his chin because of his fight with Anderson... Of course, it's not like getting KTFO by him isn't a norm or anything. -- TheShadowCrow ( talk) 22:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Anderson can KO anyone... Chris Leben has shown an iron chin in many fights. And btw why is Chuck Liddell on both lists. His chin is clearly one of the weak ones! JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 05:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Yeah that's what I said. And Liddell used to have an iron chin. It's a good example of how damage can affect a fighter's chin. -- TheShadowCrow ( talk) 15:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Just curious, what fights did he show an iron chin in? I'm curious. I wanna see them. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 16:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Tito, Landi-Jons, Metzger, Vitor, Overeem, and in the first Rampage fight he got hit hard on the chin at least 8-9 times, was staggered but never went down. -- TheShadowCrow ( talk) 21:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
I see, nice! JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 01:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Glad to see that have publicly mentioned it now, not that it makes it any less of a mess. Appreciate all of the work you've been doing on the MMA pages. Keep it up! Udar55 ( talk) 13:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I see that you do a lot of edits of the ufc event pages. I just want to ask you if you do edit a page, you type in the summary what you changed exactly. Then others can see what has changed. Thanks in advance ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiMntjMMA ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Well it does show what was changed anyway. But I try to put summary in everytime I can. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 20:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!
Kevlar ( talk) 00:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 01:58, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
I am just asking why you have taken the original birth place of Jimi Manuwa to replaced them with mistakes by the UFC. You have made the article contradict itself, there is no reference to him being from Sacramento e.g 'Jimi, who moved to England from Nigeria when he was ten, says he has been frustrated and angry ever since he was young.' You can see you have made the article contradict itself. Also considering the fact they have spelled his name 'Poster Boiy' wrong on the website, doesn't help the credibility. Please don't everything that the UFC says for gosppel. Revert the 'vandalism' you made please.
I took a look at the History of many UFC articles, and I saw that you are one of the most prominent contributors.
The fight was announced as a TKO by the announcer, please do not change it. -- Willdawg111 ( talk) 02:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
The announcer made a mistake, Joe Rogan and Mike GOldberg make mistakes all the time. This reliable source says a KO.
http://www.sherdog.com/events/BFC-Bellator-Fighting-Championships-78-25211
Plus watching the fight you could tell it was a KO. You also failed to leave a method. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 02:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Then you should provide a reliable source saying so instead of engaging in an edit war. I am using this as a reliable source: http://www.sherdog.com/events/BFC-Bellator-Fighting-Championships-78-25211
Also this looks like it's not the 1st time you have been warned about edit warring. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 02:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Please present the link. I have commented on the Bellator pages talk section. Until then we shall go off the reliable source of sherdog.com JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 02:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKFasLXEyAY Look at the 2:02 mark.
It was a TKO, thanks.-- Willdawg111 ( talk) 02:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry but the UFC is not a WP:RS, it does not have a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" in this case it has a vested interest in bending reality to help it's marketing. If you disagree feel free to take it to the WP:RS/N. Mt king (edits) 22:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Please don't make changes to the notability lists without discussing them on the talk page. The criteria used were discussed at WT:MMANOT and then objectively applied. They are also clearly stated in the text at WP:MMANOT. Being top tier for one gender does not automatically mean it's top tier for the other gender. Obvious example: Invicta is just for female fighters, so claiming top tier status for male fighters would be ludicrous. Papaursa ( talk) 01:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Again, please stop making additions to the notable organizations without consensus. Currently there have been no UFC women's fights. It's quite possible that the UFC may become a top tier women's organization, but there are objective criteria to be met. Right now adding the UFC to the women's list is WP:CRYSTALBALL. Papaursa ( talk) 20:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Your AfD submissions are coming out a little strange - please read the How to nominate a single page for deletion on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Right now they are not titled or added to the log page. I fixed a few. Peter Rehse ( talk) 08:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
What you did at User_talk:Mtking#Warning_for_Vandalism_and_content_removal is an inappropriate use of the warning templates. Regardless of whether or not Mtking's edits at List of current UFC fighters are appropriate for the content of the article, they are not vandalism. See Wikipedia:VAND#Boldly_editing and Wikipedia:VAND#Incorrect_wiki_markup_and_style. If you continue to inappropriately warn users, I will block you. MBisanz talk 06:38, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm just saying, I have seen alot of discrimination against MMA editors on wikipedia, which is bad for the site. The UFC 155 deletion without reason by Kww was a prime example. We proved that the event was notable with policy based reasons, citing the fact there was a Heavyweight Title fight at the event, and it was still unjustly deleted. That is an example of bias toward on wikipedia. I am also not for ANYONE who uses personal attacks, whether they are an MMA editor or a deletionist. However I feel alot of those personal attacks stem from provocation and discrimination of MMA editors. I just hope you guys realize that the problem is NOT MMA on wikipedia, it is Mtking on wikipedia. There was no issue and all was quiet and running smooth til he came back after his 1st attempt to destroy us. I fear the sanctions will be one sided against MMA editors. I believe wikipedia should be unbiased, it was made for the people after all. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 22:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Please note that this is not a template message, there is no red stop sign, it is intended to be a polite observation that after it has been pointed out to you by three editors here, here and here (and this could be classed as the fourth, plus other edit sums on articles such as this one) that the RfC at WT:MMA#RFC on WP:MMA's use of Flag Icons in relation to MOS:FLAG covers the addition of flags in both tables and lists when relating to UFC/MMA. Any continual action along thoes lines is likely to be viewed as disruptive and or Poninty editing, I urge you to be cautious as that road will lead you to a bad place. Mt king (edits) 07:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
a) UFC is not a WP:RS and b) nothing on the UFC's home page says it is a governing body or a competition between countries. Mt king (edits) 08:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The word "source" as used on Wikipedia has three related meanings:
the piece of work itself (the article, book),"
Actually is a WP:RS. And http://www.ufc.com/program if you flip thru those pages you will see the flag and name of each country's competitor, and a brief discription of their stats on the other pages. Read up! JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 08:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Please read the explanation. AfD doesn't apply for redirects. They are deleted along with the main article latter on. Peter Rehse ( talk) 08:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! I don't think there is any policy against noting it in the AfD, but it doesn't count for anything. It's not an argument against voiding the AfD or keeping the article in any way in this case. Bjelleklang - talk 08:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. Just a note that you must not remove declined unblock requests regarding your blocks. -- LlamaAl ( talk) 06:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Some people seem to be confused about how to catagorize MMA fights. You are definitely not the only one, but since you are trying to get so many pages deleted that are actually notable, I wanted to make sure you understood. If you look at WP:NMMA, it only requires fights for notability to be put on by a top tier organization and be professional. All legal MMA fights in the US are done at 3 levels, toughman, amateur, or professional. Once you are a professional, you can not got back down to amateur to compete. Every single fighter on TUF, is a professional fighter, and every single fight on TUF is legal and sanctioned by the NSAC. When they call them exhibition fights, they only mean that they have worked out a deal where they don't have to report them to the ABC to be immediately put on the record. They did this because you could go to a person's record and create a bracket of who won and who loss if they didn't do that. It doesn't mean that they aren't professional and put on by a top tier, which is all that is required to be notable by WP:NMMA. If you personally have an issue with TUF fights being used, then I would suggest trying to get the guidelines changed, but as of now, quite a few of those articles should never have been recomended per WP:NMMA. Until such a time exists, that the guidelines are changed, please follow them. Thanks. And feel free to delete this if you want, because if you do delete it, then you are acknowledging that you read it and understand it. Willdawg111 ( talk) 15:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
You are missing the point. There is nothing that says exhibition bouts don't count. Since an exhibition bout can still be a professional fight and can still be put on by a top tier organization, Professional exhibition bouts you see put on by the UFC (which is what TUF fights are) still fall into the guidelines setup by WP:NMMA. You and a couple other people keep hanging onto the word exhibition and as far as the guidelines go, it's irrelevant. Willdawg111 ( talk) 03:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
One warning, and only one. You cannot say that the result of the MMA discussion applied only to results tables. In fact, the discussion itself covered the use of flags in general. Furthermore, the whole point of the RfC was just to affirm that MOS:FLAG applied in its restrictive sense to MMA articles. If you add flags or revert someone else's removal of flags from an MMA article I will block you. And it will be for a sizable length of time. Qwyrxian ( talk) 07:47, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is JonnyBonesJones. Thank you. Qwyrxian ( talk)
As far as the definition of passive-aggressive behavior goes, it's easy enough to find if you're willing to look outside your hermetically sealed world. Like, say, here:
Passive aggressive behavior can manifest itself as learned helplessness, procrastination, hostility masquerading as jokes, stubbornness, resentment, sullenness, or deliberate/repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is (often explicitly) responsible -- Calton | Talk 21:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Per the approved Wikipedia:General_sanctions in MMA related areas, and as I am an uninvolved admin, you are hereby placed on restriction from editing any flag in any article on Wikipedia, including non-MMA articles, for a period of 6 months including adding flags to MMA articles you create. You may continue to discuss the matter of flags on article talk pages. Anymore disruption or bad faith accusations in this topic area will result in stricter restrictions or a block.--v/r - T P 18:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. (
✉→
BWilkins
←✎) 22:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
TParis and Biwilkins are good admin. They do not do sanctions lightly. There seems to be no reason for any appeals etc. and I firmly believe you are doing yourself and the community a service by accepting sanctions in a reasonable fashion. When you return, this editor (me ) is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
As a courtesy, I am leaving the options that I referred to, that you may not know about. Please do not see this as a suggestion to appeal. It is not. I am offering only what little I know about these matters to show that there are always options, but the one you chose is the best path in this case.
Options when you feel an sanction or block was unjustified (not the case here)
|
---|
|
-- Amadscientist ( talk) 09:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
I have had it with all this anal nonsense. I'm most likely gunna be blocked as a martyr for MMA on wikipedia. If anyone who is part of the MMA project is sick of all the bullshit from Mtking and Hasteur and the anal admins, please join me at the true MMA wikipedia:
http://mmawiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
Thanks everyone. JonnyBonesJones ( talk) 14:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
<Personal attacks, attempted outing, etc, redacted> -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 14:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)