|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Johnathan Staci Kim has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Johnathan Staci Kim was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zbIb1DpbVk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy, as well as other parts of our
external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
12:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Jonathankim1971. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Johnathan, you may not add unsourced, poorly sourced or promotional content to a Wikipedia article. See also the above note re: COI, to which you haven't responded. If these edits continue I'll ask that this account be blocked. Thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia.
2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnathan Staci Kim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnathan Staci Kim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Katie
talk
21:35, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Johnathan Staci Kim has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Johnathan Staci Kim was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zbIb1DpbVk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy, as well as other parts of our
external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
12:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Jonathankim1971. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Johnathan, you may not add unsourced, poorly sourced or promotional content to a Wikipedia article. See also the above note re: COI, to which you haven't responded. If these edits continue I'll ask that this account be blocked. Thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia.
2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnathan Staci Kim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnathan Staci Kim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Katie
talk
21:35, 25 July 2017 (UTC)