Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):
User ID | Last Name | Origin | 3 9 3 | 1 9 | 4 2 6 | 3 8 8 | 3 8 9 | 1 | 3 9 2 | 3 8 9 | 2 | 4 5 9 a | 4 5 9 b | 4 5 5 | 4 5 4 | 4 3 7 | 4 4 8 | Y C A I I a | Y C A I I b | 5 7 8 | 3 9 5 S 1 b | 5 9 0 | 4 7 2 | 4 3 6 | 4 9 0 | 4 5 0 | 4 9 2 | 5 6 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVH4G | J1c3d Modal Haplotype 24 of 67 markers to predict J1c3d within a genetic distance of 3. | Unknown | 12 | 14 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 11 | 30 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 11 |
"The basic rule – with some specific exceptions outlined below – is, that you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk)
02:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I actually don't want to make the file public right now (don't want it used just yet). I am not a PhD scientist (yet at least) or anything, I just made it for fun (sorta) originally. Do you mind if I email it to you instead?-- Yalens ( talk) 01:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I got it. It needs work and I do not know your methodology. Tofanelli used online software from Hawaii an just tossed in some Lat/Long that is totally without individualization. He then put it in his paper and said he'd tell you how he does it if you email him. The supplemental data is on his My thought is you should have a list of birth places that go with the data rather than just tagging 184 men, of which 18 may be J1 in Kazakhstan. Then he lets the software spread it out so it looks more meaningful than it is. What the software does with a 1000 points of measurement for weather, he lets it do with 30-40 points from collection points of swabs whole populations. As you may have guessed, I am not impressed with his methodology.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk)
03:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
BOTTOM LINE-the Map is wrong:
________________________
Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. John Lloyd Scharf 10:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):
User ID | Last Name | Origin | 3 9 3 | 1 9 | 4 2 6 | 3 8 8 | 3 8 9 | 1 | 3 9 2 | 3 8 9 | 2 | 4 5 9 a | 4 5 9 b | 4 5 5 | 4 5 4 | 4 3 7 | 4 4 8 | Y C A I I a | Y C A I I b | 5 7 8 | 3 9 5 S 1 b | 5 9 0 | 4 7 2 | 4 3 6 | 4 9 0 | 4 5 0 | 4 9 2 | 5 6 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVH4G | J1c3d Modal Haplotype 24 of 67 markers to predict J1c3d within a genetic distance of 3. | Unknown | 12 | 14 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 11 | 30 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 11 |
"The basic rule – with some specific exceptions outlined below – is, that you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk)
02:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I actually don't want to make the file public right now (don't want it used just yet). I am not a PhD scientist (yet at least) or anything, I just made it for fun (sorta) originally. Do you mind if I email it to you instead?-- Yalens ( talk) 01:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I got it. It needs work and I do not know your methodology. Tofanelli used online software from Hawaii an just tossed in some Lat/Long that is totally without individualization. He then put it in his paper and said he'd tell you how he does it if you email him. The supplemental data is on his My thought is you should have a list of birth places that go with the data rather than just tagging 184 men, of which 18 may be J1 in Kazakhstan. Then he lets the software spread it out so it looks more meaningful than it is. What the software does with a 1000 points of measurement for weather, he lets it do with 30-40 points from collection points of swabs whole populations. As you may have guessed, I am not impressed with his methodology.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk)
03:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
BOTTOM LINE-the Map is wrong:
________________________
Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. John Lloyd Scharf 10:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)