|
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Trip the light fantastic, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please also see
WP:IPCV.
DonIago (
talk)
15:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mathglot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Elagabalus, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Mathglot (
talk)
18:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Mathglot. I couldn't find your TALK page, or rather, when I clicked on the link to it, I could see an array of messages and exchanges with Wikipedia contributors, but not your MESSAGE to me, about Eliogabalus and Edith Sitwell, and nowhere I could REPLY to you. So I am editing my own USER TALK, hoping you will see it. I do not know, yet, how to CITE in Wikipedia, so usually I refer to published works using two apostrophes to start and end as This Cited Title. What I added to the POETRY sub-section of the article on Eliogabalus was correct. The Wikipedia page on "Facade Suite: an Entertainment" confirms this. /info/en/?search=Fa%C3%A7ade_(entertainment)
Could you fix my absent citation, please? Thanks, John
Thank you for
your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
David Biddulph (
talk)
12:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Thomas More, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Lovely Joan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
✠ SunDawn ✠
(contact)
03:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. In a recent edit to the page
Country Gardens, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. EditingProperly ( talk) 10:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Thomas Cromwell, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use
your sandbox. Thank you.
AntientNestor (
talk)
07:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
That's the way to go. Tracy Borman (to name but one) has one you could use here—it's page 59 in the print version. I think it would pass WP:COPYQUOTE.
-- AntientNestor ( talk) 09:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi JohnAGough,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
Tubthumping has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
ResPM (
T🔈
🎵C)
11:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
La La Lucille has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
DanCherek (
talk)
06:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Investigating the Samuel French Collection at Amherst College, Massachusetts in August 2023, University of Michigan researcher Jacob Kerzner discovered a box labelled “La la Lucille“. This box contained not just the surviving songs but Gershwin’s complete musical orchestration of the show, with parts for flute, cello, trumpet, trombone, percussion, violin, cello, bass and piano – making it possible to hear La, La, Lucille as its composer intended. This rediscovered musical score for La, La, Lucille will be published in a scholarly edition courtesy of the Gershwin Initiative, a partnership between the Gershwin families and the University of Michigan’s School of Music, Theatre & Dance devoted to the ongoing re-examination of the Gershwins’ music.
Poring over the Samuel French Collection at Amherst College, Massachusetts in August 2023, University of Michigan researcher Jacob Kerzner discovered a box labelled “La la Lucille“. [...] the box contained not just the surviving songs but Gershwin’s complete musical orchestration of the show, with parts for flute, cello, trumpet, trombone, percussion, violin, cello, bass and piano – making it possible to hear La, La, Lucille as its composer intended. [...] In coming months, La, La, Lucille also will be published in a scholarly edition courtesy of the Gershwin Initiative, a partnership between the Gershwin families and the University of Michigan’s School of Music, Theatre & Dance devoted to the ongoing re-examination of the Gershwins’ music.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Outlander (novel), it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
TJRC (
talk)
15:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
The recent edits you made to
Harry Graham (poet) have been reverted, as you did not cite your source(s). Please review
WP:V and
WP:OR. This is an encyclopedia, so we try to write neutrally (see
WP:IMPARTIAL). A word like "cunning" implies that we approve of what Graham did, or at least is our characterization of what he did. The characterization is unnecessary editorializing: let the reader decide whether what he did was cunning, humorous, cute, foolish, or whatever. All the best, --
Ssilvers (
talk)
19:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Trip the light fantastic, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please also see
WP:IPCV.
DonIago (
talk)
15:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mathglot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Elagabalus, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Mathglot (
talk)
18:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Mathglot. I couldn't find your TALK page, or rather, when I clicked on the link to it, I could see an array of messages and exchanges with Wikipedia contributors, but not your MESSAGE to me, about Eliogabalus and Edith Sitwell, and nowhere I could REPLY to you. So I am editing my own USER TALK, hoping you will see it. I do not know, yet, how to CITE in Wikipedia, so usually I refer to published works using two apostrophes to start and end as This Cited Title. What I added to the POETRY sub-section of the article on Eliogabalus was correct. The Wikipedia page on "Facade Suite: an Entertainment" confirms this. /info/en/?search=Fa%C3%A7ade_(entertainment)
Could you fix my absent citation, please? Thanks, John
Thank you for
your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
David Biddulph (
talk)
12:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Thomas More, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Lovely Joan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
✠ SunDawn ✠
(contact)
03:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. In a recent edit to the page
Country Gardens, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. EditingProperly ( talk) 10:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Thomas Cromwell, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use
your sandbox. Thank you.
AntientNestor (
talk)
07:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
That's the way to go. Tracy Borman (to name but one) has one you could use here—it's page 59 in the print version. I think it would pass WP:COPYQUOTE.
-- AntientNestor ( talk) 09:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi JohnAGough,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
Tubthumping has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
ResPM (
T🔈
🎵C)
11:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
La La Lucille has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
DanCherek (
talk)
06:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Investigating the Samuel French Collection at Amherst College, Massachusetts in August 2023, University of Michigan researcher Jacob Kerzner discovered a box labelled “La la Lucille“. This box contained not just the surviving songs but Gershwin’s complete musical orchestration of the show, with parts for flute, cello, trumpet, trombone, percussion, violin, cello, bass and piano – making it possible to hear La, La, Lucille as its composer intended. This rediscovered musical score for La, La, Lucille will be published in a scholarly edition courtesy of the Gershwin Initiative, a partnership between the Gershwin families and the University of Michigan’s School of Music, Theatre & Dance devoted to the ongoing re-examination of the Gershwins’ music.
Poring over the Samuel French Collection at Amherst College, Massachusetts in August 2023, University of Michigan researcher Jacob Kerzner discovered a box labelled “La la Lucille“. [...] the box contained not just the surviving songs but Gershwin’s complete musical orchestration of the show, with parts for flute, cello, trumpet, trombone, percussion, violin, cello, bass and piano – making it possible to hear La, La, Lucille as its composer intended. [...] In coming months, La, La, Lucille also will be published in a scholarly edition courtesy of the Gershwin Initiative, a partnership between the Gershwin families and the University of Michigan’s School of Music, Theatre & Dance devoted to the ongoing re-examination of the Gershwins’ music.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Outlander (novel), it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
TJRC (
talk)
15:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
The recent edits you made to
Harry Graham (poet) have been reverted, as you did not cite your source(s). Please review
WP:V and
WP:OR. This is an encyclopedia, so we try to write neutrally (see
WP:IMPARTIAL). A word like "cunning" implies that we approve of what Graham did, or at least is our characterization of what he did. The characterization is unnecessary editorializing: let the reader decide whether what he did was cunning, humorous, cute, foolish, or whatever. All the best, --
Ssilvers (
talk)
19:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)