Joe Creation's talk to Joe page
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nick Mancuso may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nick Mancuso may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm going to ask you what I've asked others, have you read WP:MOVIE and if so could you please be more specific at the AfD about the policy and guideline criteria that you think the video meets? Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 07:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Joecreation, thanks for your concern about the RL article. I do apresciate your effort. If you'd like to improve future articles of mine and contribute then that would be helpful. Thanks again [1] ( Boss Reality ( talk) 23:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC))
I'm wondering if you are under the impressions that these are decided by votes. Although what we call !voting takes place, what is important is the weight of the arguments based on our policies and guidelines. I note that in general you fail to actually show, when !voting keep, any evidence that the article meets any specific guidelines. This simply means that your !vote gets ignored. If you don't mind that, fine. If you want your voice to have any impact then you have to give guideline or policy based reasons, and if you are saying notability criteria are met you need to provide sources. Dougweller ( talk) 12:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Please feel free to discuss your views at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Popwell. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 22:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Unblock me please ( Joecreation ( talk) 08:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC))
Joe Creation's talk to Joe page
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nick Mancuso may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nick Mancuso may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm going to ask you what I've asked others, have you read WP:MOVIE and if so could you please be more specific at the AfD about the policy and guideline criteria that you think the video meets? Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 07:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Joecreation, thanks for your concern about the RL article. I do apresciate your effort. If you'd like to improve future articles of mine and contribute then that would be helpful. Thanks again [1] ( Boss Reality ( talk) 23:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC))
I'm wondering if you are under the impressions that these are decided by votes. Although what we call !voting takes place, what is important is the weight of the arguments based on our policies and guidelines. I note that in general you fail to actually show, when !voting keep, any evidence that the article meets any specific guidelines. This simply means that your !vote gets ignored. If you don't mind that, fine. If you want your voice to have any impact then you have to give guideline or policy based reasons, and if you are saying notability criteria are met you need to provide sources. Dougweller ( talk) 12:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Please feel free to discuss your views at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Popwell. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 22:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Unblock me please ( Joecreation ( talk) 08:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC))