No edit summary |
Jmortoza26 (
talk |
contribs) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Thank you for moving it and good luck writing your article! [[User:Tinss|Tinss]] ([[User talk:Tinss|talk]]) 22:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC) |
:Thank you for moving it and good luck writing your article! [[User:Tinss|Tinss]] ([[User talk:Tinss|talk]]) 22:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Recommend Deletion == |
|||
Recommend deletion per CSD. Have added cleanup and POV tags. [[User:Saebvn|Saebvn]] ([[User talk:Saebvn|talk]]) 22:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC) |
This article has been created to help those who are affected by discriminatory practices in nationality law as descended from female British citizens whose children are often times ignored and by passed. The objectives of this article is to provide a one stop location to
1. The Laws as it stands
2. Changes in Laws
3. Processes in Applications
4. Relevant web sites
5. Notable Links
6. Legislations and Regulations
7. Current Issues being challenged
-- Jmortoza26 ( talk) 19:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello there, While there may be an issue with this particular subject, I sincerely believe Wikipedia is not the place for you article. I have a hard time believing you will be able to achieve your goals while maintaining a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV), especially if you have an emotional connection with the subject. Wikipedia is not a place to help others or to guide them trough processes and applications but to inform them with encyclopedic knowledge, and this requires substantial references as well as a neutral attitude.
I would suggest that you split your article and treat each logical part (pressure groups, laws, processes, etc) in a separate article with accurate and factual references supporting the content. If you want to do any sort of advocacy, create a blog or a website that links to wikipedia articles relevant to your subject. In the process, you will provide your readership with quality information and will also benefit the other users of wikipedia.
For the time being, I fear that your article will be nominated for deletion (WP:DEL) or affixed with banners like
![]() | This article contains content that is written like
an advertisement. |
![]() | The
neutrality of this article is
disputed. |
if the situation is not corrected soon, which will greatly undermine its credibility. Good luck! Tinss ( talk) 21:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
No edit summary |
Jmortoza26 (
talk |
contribs) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Thank you for moving it and good luck writing your article! [[User:Tinss|Tinss]] ([[User talk:Tinss|talk]]) 22:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC) |
:Thank you for moving it and good luck writing your article! [[User:Tinss|Tinss]] ([[User talk:Tinss|talk]]) 22:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Recommend Deletion == |
|||
Recommend deletion per CSD. Have added cleanup and POV tags. [[User:Saebvn|Saebvn]] ([[User talk:Saebvn|talk]]) 22:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC) |
This article has been created to help those who are affected by discriminatory practices in nationality law as descended from female British citizens whose children are often times ignored and by passed. The objectives of this article is to provide a one stop location to
1. The Laws as it stands
2. Changes in Laws
3. Processes in Applications
4. Relevant web sites
5. Notable Links
6. Legislations and Regulations
7. Current Issues being challenged
-- Jmortoza26 ( talk) 19:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello there, While there may be an issue with this particular subject, I sincerely believe Wikipedia is not the place for you article. I have a hard time believing you will be able to achieve your goals while maintaining a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV), especially if you have an emotional connection with the subject. Wikipedia is not a place to help others or to guide them trough processes and applications but to inform them with encyclopedic knowledge, and this requires substantial references as well as a neutral attitude.
I would suggest that you split your article and treat each logical part (pressure groups, laws, processes, etc) in a separate article with accurate and factual references supporting the content. If you want to do any sort of advocacy, create a blog or a website that links to wikipedia articles relevant to your subject. In the process, you will provide your readership with quality information and will also benefit the other users of wikipedia.
For the time being, I fear that your article will be nominated for deletion (WP:DEL) or affixed with banners like
![]() | This article contains content that is written like
an advertisement. |
![]() | The
neutrality of this article is
disputed. |
if the situation is not corrected soon, which will greatly undermine its credibility. Good luck! Tinss ( talk) 21:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)