Hello, Jim Shead, and
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our
intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Famous name in UK waterways: any connection? Happy editing!
Old Moonraker (
talk) 11:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
Galton's Canal, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. TimTay ( talk) 11:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I can see these are good-faith, indeed helpful, edits. Contributors, me included, have used web pages from Jim Shead as references. Some are now suffering from linkrot and User:Jim Shead is fixing them. The contributor should be thanked! -- Old Moonraker ( talk) 12:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the majority of edits have been good faith and very helpful. WP is clear on conflict of interest. I do acknowledge that this users has fixed some links, but I warned him because he reinstated a Jim Shead link that I deleted on Galton's Canal, a link to a website that contained virtually no content - far less than was on the wikipedia page itself. Reinstating one's own link to an article is a clear conflict of interest when good reason has been given for deleting it. While some of Jim Sheads web pages contain a great deal of useful data and form good citations, others such as the external links to Galton's and Anson Branch contain very little information and fall foul of the very first criteria in WP:LINKSTOAVOID. -- TimTay ( talk) 12:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I hope this isn't biting a newcomer. -- Old Moonraker ( talk) 12:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Jim,
is there some particular pattern to the link changes that need to be made? If so, drop me a note, and I'llsee if I can automate the changes. Mayalld ( talk) 22:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Tom and Jerry, please cite a
reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at
Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you could provide refs for that statement I'd find it absolutely fascinating!
Etrigan (
talk) 09:12, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for the contribution!-- Old Moonraker ( talk) 13:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Jim Shead, and
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our
intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Famous name in UK waterways: any connection? Happy editing!
Old Moonraker (
talk) 11:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
Galton's Canal, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. TimTay ( talk) 11:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I can see these are good-faith, indeed helpful, edits. Contributors, me included, have used web pages from Jim Shead as references. Some are now suffering from linkrot and User:Jim Shead is fixing them. The contributor should be thanked! -- Old Moonraker ( talk) 12:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the majority of edits have been good faith and very helpful. WP is clear on conflict of interest. I do acknowledge that this users has fixed some links, but I warned him because he reinstated a Jim Shead link that I deleted on Galton's Canal, a link to a website that contained virtually no content - far less than was on the wikipedia page itself. Reinstating one's own link to an article is a clear conflict of interest when good reason has been given for deleting it. While some of Jim Sheads web pages contain a great deal of useful data and form good citations, others such as the external links to Galton's and Anson Branch contain very little information and fall foul of the very first criteria in WP:LINKSTOAVOID. -- TimTay ( talk) 12:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I hope this isn't biting a newcomer. -- Old Moonraker ( talk) 12:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Jim,
is there some particular pattern to the link changes that need to be made? If so, drop me a note, and I'llsee if I can automate the changes. Mayalld ( talk) 22:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Tom and Jerry, please cite a
reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at
Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you could provide refs for that statement I'd find it absolutely fascinating!
Etrigan (
talk) 09:12, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for the contribution!-- Old Moonraker ( talk) 13:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)