|
Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) 23:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jhutson64. I was going through the list of articles for deletion and came across Michael Potts. I posted a "weak delete" recommendation for the article, but I decided to tell you how you can save it. Right now the way to save it is to provide better sources. You need to provide independent secondary sources that has Michael Potts as the subject. For example, a chapter in a book (that was written by someone unrelated) that talks about the phenomenon of the man, or a news article from a website that talks more about the man himself and not just about what happened to his company.
When you find those sources, you can let other editors know here, and if you want you can let me know here so I can change my recommendation. All the best!-- Samuel Tan ( talk) 06:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Yup I've changed my stance on the Andrew Wolk article to weak keep after seeing your new sources. See how the discussion goes on the deletion forums. I'm guessing it won't be deleted in the end :) - Samuel Tan 15:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded File:PHR logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew Wolk.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The file File:Michael Potts.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Wolk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Wolk (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 04:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
|
Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) 23:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jhutson64. I was going through the list of articles for deletion and came across Michael Potts. I posted a "weak delete" recommendation for the article, but I decided to tell you how you can save it. Right now the way to save it is to provide better sources. You need to provide independent secondary sources that has Michael Potts as the subject. For example, a chapter in a book (that was written by someone unrelated) that talks about the phenomenon of the man, or a news article from a website that talks more about the man himself and not just about what happened to his company.
When you find those sources, you can let other editors know here, and if you want you can let me know here so I can change my recommendation. All the best!-- Samuel Tan ( talk) 06:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Yup I've changed my stance on the Andrew Wolk article to weak keep after seeing your new sources. See how the discussion goes on the deletion forums. I'm guessing it won't be deleted in the end :) - Samuel Tan 15:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded File:PHR logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew Wolk.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The file File:Michael Potts.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Wolk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Wolk (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 04:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)