Hi. In response to your question, the footnoted citations in "Another Gospel" are in footnotes 12 to 19 for Appendix A. See page 429 in the online book. -- Orlady ( talk) 14:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I think the limited edition flavours would probably be better in their own section with an explanation of their significance, etc. which i don't believe is currently mentioned anywhere in the article. What do you think? --neon white talk 00:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez
Get to know me! /
Talk to me!←at≈:→
22:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Danxia, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
You should know better than to post anything Jonty-related. Do it again and you'll get another (likely lasting) indef block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
i know you're doing this because you don't like me, probably because we've argued before and because i've said i'm a fan of a game which you obviously really hate ( [2]). either tell me that i'm banned from mentioning the name of that website even in situations where another editor would be fine to do so, why, and what gives you the right to give me such a ban, OR, put back my edit, strikeout this warning, stop victimising me and leave me alone. Jessi1989 ( talk) 14:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I see why that site got blocked now, but threatening a block simply for mentioning it is a bit much! I narrowly avoided mentioning it on the talk page. I'll carry on editing it to improve the page. I'm interested enough in the topic that I've asked the editor of Manifold magazine for a copy of the article from the 1970s discussing Finchley Central, the Mornington Crescent-alike and precursor to the Game. Fences and windows ( talk) 06:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. In response to your question, the footnoted citations in "Another Gospel" are in footnotes 12 to 19 for Appendix A. See page 429 in the online book. -- Orlady ( talk) 14:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I think the limited edition flavours would probably be better in their own section with an explanation of their significance, etc. which i don't believe is currently mentioned anywhere in the article. What do you think? --neon white talk 00:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez
Get to know me! /
Talk to me!←at≈:→
22:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Danxia, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
You should know better than to post anything Jonty-related. Do it again and you'll get another (likely lasting) indef block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
i know you're doing this because you don't like me, probably because we've argued before and because i've said i'm a fan of a game which you obviously really hate ( [2]). either tell me that i'm banned from mentioning the name of that website even in situations where another editor would be fine to do so, why, and what gives you the right to give me such a ban, OR, put back my edit, strikeout this warning, stop victimising me and leave me alone. Jessi1989 ( talk) 14:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I see why that site got blocked now, but threatening a block simply for mentioning it is a bit much! I narrowly avoided mentioning it on the talk page. I'll carry on editing it to improve the page. I'm interested enough in the topic that I've asked the editor of Manifold magazine for a copy of the article from the 1970s discussing Finchley Central, the Mornington Crescent-alike and precursor to the Game. Fences and windows ( talk) 06:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)