Hi Jesse003! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Bitquence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 14:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for message. My protection of the article title was due to an error in reading the logs, now removed. I deleted your draft article because
The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See other stuff exists.
Before attempting to write an article again, please check that the topic meets the notability criteria I've linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above
Ping Anthony Appleyard for info Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Ping Anthony Appleyard<br. There is nothing to be thankful about, not owning something that has gone from 20 cents to $5000 in 18 years is not exactly something to be thankful for. No one in the crypto world would trust anything coming out of an news agency such as Daily Telegraph because like yourself they don't understand it. And what people don't understand they fear. The value of bitcoin crashed ... did it? Perhaps for a day, that's normal business as usual. Anyway what I am writing about has nothing to do with bitcoin. But it seems it's difficult to write about something barely anyone outside the world of cryptocurrencies understands.
It may appear on or in independent American newspapers or TV, or perhaps an episode of the Simpsons eventually. But really all those agency's care about is bitcoin and posting about only when there is not so great news. This is not where we get our news from. We get it from independent established news websites that have been around over 15 years, that only report on cryptocurrency related news. I will create sources for that I guess.
This has been a real eye opener actually. I really understand wikipedia a lot better now.
Jesse003 ( talk) 11:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the comments I have reread the this guidance and I get what you are saying it's a lot to take in even after reading it twice. I decided to post here so it's all in one place as I get confused otherwise.
You are correct the sources are not ideal, other than coinmarketcap.com. Any coin in the top 100 is considered a big deal. I figured more is better than less so I put everything in. I guess I will go with less. There will be many more sources within a few weeks or a month so I will put it on hold until then.
I have edited wiki's before just not specifically Wikipedia, more alternative wikis. What prompted me to write one was several other cryptocurrencies not in the top 100 having wiki pages, but again they have been around for a lot longer so sources are easier to find.
Can you please clarify spam links. Doesn't seem like the correct term. Do you mean links that can be edited by users or paid for by sponsors? The term spam doesn't really fit by my definition so it really confused me.
Thanks again for the response. I will put this on hold until I can find acceptable sources.
Jesse003 (
talk)
04:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jesse003! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Bitquence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 14:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for message. My protection of the article title was due to an error in reading the logs, now removed. I deleted your draft article because
The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See other stuff exists.
Before attempting to write an article again, please check that the topic meets the notability criteria I've linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above
Ping Anthony Appleyard for info Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Ping Anthony Appleyard<br. There is nothing to be thankful about, not owning something that has gone from 20 cents to $5000 in 18 years is not exactly something to be thankful for. No one in the crypto world would trust anything coming out of an news agency such as Daily Telegraph because like yourself they don't understand it. And what people don't understand they fear. The value of bitcoin crashed ... did it? Perhaps for a day, that's normal business as usual. Anyway what I am writing about has nothing to do with bitcoin. But it seems it's difficult to write about something barely anyone outside the world of cryptocurrencies understands.
It may appear on or in independent American newspapers or TV, or perhaps an episode of the Simpsons eventually. But really all those agency's care about is bitcoin and posting about only when there is not so great news. This is not where we get our news from. We get it from independent established news websites that have been around over 15 years, that only report on cryptocurrency related news. I will create sources for that I guess.
This has been a real eye opener actually. I really understand wikipedia a lot better now.
Jesse003 ( talk) 11:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the comments I have reread the this guidance and I get what you are saying it's a lot to take in even after reading it twice. I decided to post here so it's all in one place as I get confused otherwise.
You are correct the sources are not ideal, other than coinmarketcap.com. Any coin in the top 100 is considered a big deal. I figured more is better than less so I put everything in. I guess I will go with less. There will be many more sources within a few weeks or a month so I will put it on hold until then.
I have edited wiki's before just not specifically Wikipedia, more alternative wikis. What prompted me to write one was several other cryptocurrencies not in the top 100 having wiki pages, but again they have been around for a lot longer so sources are easier to find.
Can you please clarify spam links. Doesn't seem like the correct term. Do you mean links that can be edited by users or paid for by sponsors? The term spam doesn't really fit by my definition so it really confused me.
Thanks again for the response. I will put this on hold until I can find acceptable sources.
Jesse003 (
talk)
04:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)