![]() |
Hi Jeronemoo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
GeneralNotability ( talk) 02:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've looked at the references you listed as WP:THREE but none meet the criteria for establishing notability. Here's why.
Firstly, be aware that there are two types of references (I'm paraphrasing a lot, bear with me). Some references, you can use to establish the facts and details within the article - they don't need to pass WP:NCORP and you are free to use them as you are doing. But anything that is used to establish notability must pass NCORP. There are two sections in WP:NCORP which are difficult to pass. The first is WP:ORGIND and the second is WP:CORPDEPTH. ORGIND says that a reference must include "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. All three of the references you referred in your WP:THREE fail ORGIND. CORPDEPTH says that the reference must provide in-depth information on the company (not on its product, executives, customers, etc). Arguably, some of your references failed this too, but I didn't measure against this once the reference failed to meet ORGIND. So .. the easiest references that meet ORGIND are when a profile is written by an analyst (maybe Gartner/Forrester/etc). Can I ask you if you are aware of any articles of profiles written by these? The next best is something that isn't triggered or relies on a company announcement or where the company didn't provide an interview which is used to base the article on. Hope that helps. HighKing ++ 11:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jeronemoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:GUTS Tickets, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Jeronemoo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " GUTS Tickets".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Jeronemoo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
GeneralNotability ( talk) 02:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've looked at the references you listed as WP:THREE but none meet the criteria for establishing notability. Here's why.
Firstly, be aware that there are two types of references (I'm paraphrasing a lot, bear with me). Some references, you can use to establish the facts and details within the article - they don't need to pass WP:NCORP and you are free to use them as you are doing. But anything that is used to establish notability must pass NCORP. There are two sections in WP:NCORP which are difficult to pass. The first is WP:ORGIND and the second is WP:CORPDEPTH. ORGIND says that a reference must include "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. All three of the references you referred in your WP:THREE fail ORGIND. CORPDEPTH says that the reference must provide in-depth information on the company (not on its product, executives, customers, etc). Arguably, some of your references failed this too, but I didn't measure against this once the reference failed to meet ORGIND. So .. the easiest references that meet ORGIND are when a profile is written by an analyst (maybe Gartner/Forrester/etc). Can I ask you if you are aware of any articles of profiles written by these? The next best is something that isn't triggered or relies on a company announcement or where the company didn't provide an interview which is used to base the article on. Hope that helps. HighKing ++ 11:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jeronemoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:GUTS Tickets, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Jeronemoo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " GUTS Tickets".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)