For the "Cash Back" column you just added to
Casey Serin: you do need a reliable source for the amounts and transactions to back up these allegations. Blog sources won't cut it if you're accusing someone of a crime in a Wikipedia article.
Saranary
20:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey - we are all allowed to contribute. Don't believe "them" ... there's nothing wrong with putting in reaction to Snowflake's blog. Lot's of wikinazis out there I know! -- PeterMarkSmith 12:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you have a problem with all of my edits, or just with the removal of the "(which the Guide alleges was bogus)"? The latter is the only one I saw mention of on the talk page, and all of them were reverted.
I thought the phrase that I removed was awkward and unclear. What does it mean for a company to be "bogus"? That the company in some way misrepresented itself to the mortgage lender? To Serin? To someone else? The sentence should at least be clarified. 24.91.135.162 03:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
For the "Cash Back" column you just added to
Casey Serin: you do need a reliable source for the amounts and transactions to back up these allegations. Blog sources won't cut it if you're accusing someone of a crime in a Wikipedia article.
Saranary
20:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey - we are all allowed to contribute. Don't believe "them" ... there's nothing wrong with putting in reaction to Snowflake's blog. Lot's of wikinazis out there I know! -- PeterMarkSmith 12:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you have a problem with all of my edits, or just with the removal of the "(which the Guide alleges was bogus)"? The latter is the only one I saw mention of on the talk page, and all of them were reverted.
I thought the phrase that I removed was awkward and unclear. What does it mean for a company to be "bogus"? That the company in some way misrepresented itself to the mortgage lender? To Serin? To someone else? The sentence should at least be clarified. 24.91.135.162 03:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)