You did a great job with the article. Floker ( talk) 16:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I sourced the Home Improvement edition of E! True Hollywood Story which aired December 18, 2005. In addition, I simply linked Hollywood Story to its Wiki page. Would that suffice, or do I need to link to online video footage from the Hollywood Story episode? I frequently see citations from books or TV episodes without links to the actual information as available online. And regardless of whether or not it will suffice, the Home Improvement article definitely should have the information I included regarding the show's end and ideas for a ninth season. Cale ( talk) 03:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering if you have any affiliation with the TPB. 86.43.178.17 ( talk) 17:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
How are those who downloaded torrents going to be affected? I've used TPB before, and I was wondering if this makes all of us who do, legally vulnerable. 86.46.200.106 ( talk) 23:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
[1] I do trust in your greater knowledge, but the site is definitely down for now. -- 87.79.175.237 ( talk) 21:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I see. Yes, I misunderstood that and other articles. Thank you for correcting me on this issue. Quinxorin ( talk) 02:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
FWIW 'The Pirate Bay Trial' article appears to be evenly split between organization/organized and organisation spellings with about a half dozen instances of each. :-) Darrell_Greenwood ( talk) 17:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The Pirate Bay has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Pcap ping 23:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
This is getting us nowhere, except an edit war. Would you be open to mediating this content dispute? -- Muboshgu ( talk) 19:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:120px-WFFT2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, JeremyWJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
You did a great job with the article. Floker ( talk) 16:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I sourced the Home Improvement edition of E! True Hollywood Story which aired December 18, 2005. In addition, I simply linked Hollywood Story to its Wiki page. Would that suffice, or do I need to link to online video footage from the Hollywood Story episode? I frequently see citations from books or TV episodes without links to the actual information as available online. And regardless of whether or not it will suffice, the Home Improvement article definitely should have the information I included regarding the show's end and ideas for a ninth season. Cale ( talk) 03:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering if you have any affiliation with the TPB. 86.43.178.17 ( talk) 17:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
How are those who downloaded torrents going to be affected? I've used TPB before, and I was wondering if this makes all of us who do, legally vulnerable. 86.46.200.106 ( talk) 23:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
[1] I do trust in your greater knowledge, but the site is definitely down for now. -- 87.79.175.237 ( talk) 21:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I see. Yes, I misunderstood that and other articles. Thank you for correcting me on this issue. Quinxorin ( talk) 02:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
FWIW 'The Pirate Bay Trial' article appears to be evenly split between organization/organized and organisation spellings with about a half dozen instances of each. :-) Darrell_Greenwood ( talk) 17:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The Pirate Bay has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Pcap ping 23:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
This is getting us nowhere, except an edit war. Would you be open to mediating this content dispute? -- Muboshgu ( talk) 19:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:120px-WFFT2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, JeremyWJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)