This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 22:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for further reviewing Cheers (Drink to That) :) Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 23:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello, I am not from Australia but have aggressively advocated keeping articles on notable Australian topics. However, this article is a WP:BLP disaster in its current form. So, if you add a few solid, reliable sources that give significant biographical coverage, and eliminate the BLP violations, I will withdraw my "delete" vote. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For helping improve the prose in 1+1 so that it would hopefully pass its GA review. Thank you for your kindness and patience. Only i know how many editors i had requested before you did the copy-edit. Keep up the good work and for me, you're definitely one of the most valued copy-editors from now. Again and again, my heartfelt thanks to you. Jivesh boodhun ( talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 17:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC) |
OK, I've made some small tweaks. In all, it was pretty good and there wasn't much I could improve on. That said, I do understand why you wanted me to have a look at that section. Sometimes it feels simply like a collection of separate incidents/performances/parodies with no real flow, which is what the really good FAs have. I've done all I really can for that section, though—if it needs to be better to meet the FA criteria, then I'm afraid you will need a better copyeditor than myself. Best, Jenks24 ( talk) 19:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I've created a full nomination for the aircraft categories you nominated for Speedy renaming. Feel free to comment on the new nomination. I haven't retagged the categories, as the link from Speedy should suffice.-- Mike Selinker ( talk) 13:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Jenks, that was very kind of you. And I should have realised this was the process ... muddle-headed me. Pity it's a virtually unused category <blushes>.
I've never looked through that CFDS page: C2B looks strange, dealing first things that seem to be contradictory:
B. A rename enforcing established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices.
Should it be "contracting" instead of "expanding"? Tony (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
It does concern me in category lists when I see book and company titles as article titles when they look like concepts. I'm tempted to insert "(book)" or "(company)", but don't because this is apparently frowned on. Tony (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Also interesting about books and companies that appear to be concepts. The problem is that to add "(book)", the actual article actually has to be renamed to add "(book)" because the categories only reflect article titles (and that goes against being concise). What would be useful would be if the listings in categories could be made to realise when the article title is in italics and reflect that – wouldn't help for companies, but it would for books. But that is something that would probably take a lot of technical know-how to implement. Jenks24 ( talk) 02:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not get your point the first time around. Thanks for being patient and re-explaining it to me. I left another question on Talk:Frederico Chaves Guedes#Requested move. Also, would you care to comment on Talk:Thiago Emiliano da Silva#Requested move, a slightly similar case, but in this case, all the other footballers with similar name went with slightly different spelling. — MT ( talk) 06:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Are you able to offer some input to this ? -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't know what to do about this weird article, which could well be an opinion piece, aside from adding a few tags to it. What's your opinion? Tony (talk) 08:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the John Munro naming discussion. I've put the last two cases up for requested move again, and you might want to contribute again. Schwede 66 04:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are in good health. My friend asked me for help. He wanted me to re-write something but i just kept reading it without figuring a better way of re-writing:
Jessica Biel, Timberlake's then-girlfriend, was reportedly upset with her boyfriend because of the sexual chemistry between him and Rihanna during the filming of the video.[44] Tim Nixon of The Sun concurred, writing: "[The video] can't be easy for Chris Brown and Jessica Biel to watch. The red hot chemistry between their respective partners Rihanna and Justin Timberlake in the pop stars' new video must be hard to stomach."[45] Speaking to Access Hollywood, Timberlake described the experience of shooting the video: "I got there and I was like really? I'm the guy in the video. So, I had to give them all insecurities about that. But yeah we had a great time, we goofed around at the shoot most of the time.""
>>>This seems like a "showbiz" column / writeup.' - as stated by the peer reviewer.
The article is here. ★Jivesh 1205★ ( talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 07:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
It was reported by Digital Spy that Jessica Biel, Timberlake's girlfriend at the time, was "fuming" at Timberlake because of the sexual chemistry between he and Rihanna in the video. Tim Nixon of The Sun concurred, writing that the "red hot chemistry" between Rihanna and Timberlake must be difficult for their partners, Chris Brown and Biel respectively, to watch. [It would be great if we could then have a source saying something along the lines of "nothing happened, the tabloids have blown this out of proportion", but if not *shrug*.] Speaking to Access Hollywood, Timberlake described the enjoyable experience he had while filming the video, saying that most of the shoot was spent "goof[ing] around".
Hello Jenks.
A month or so ago, there was a multiple move of some pages concerning the volleyball team members lists in the 2008 Summer Olympics.
In the move discussion, you insisted that, in a volleyball context, "squad" was preferred over "team roster". There was no input from other editors, so I took your word for it. But now, having checked the source in the Volleyball at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's squads, I couldn't help but notice that it in fact refers to the teams as "team rosters".
I'm now wondering if the page names here should be reconsidered. What is your view? What do you have to back your claim up with, so to speak, that it should be squads and not team rosters. I mean, if it's only for the consistency with respect to previous years, then (pages of) the previous years could be renamed for consistency. It means more work, that's for sure, but what are we here for?
Cheers.
HandsomeFella ( talk) 19:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Jenks. Thank You for the c/e of the music video paragraph, a favor that Jivesh asked from you. I also appreciate the c/e. When I look at the sentence that you left note, you are right, it's kind off stupid :). Can you read the synopsis and tell me how to re-write the sentence. Thank You — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 22:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I've made a few tweaks and replied at the FAC. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit at Talk:Ursuline Convent, I presume making a fix. Though I am a bit puzzled; your message says " don't subst that template". On my first edit I didn't, but then I saw the template itself had the text "Do not simply add this template to page-move requests; instead, use {{subst:Requested move}} or {{subst:move-multi}}", so I reedited to substitute as the template told me. It looks like conflicting messages, or am I missing something? Wondering, Infrogmation ( talk) 01:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I posted eight (I think it was 8) more redirects for action. Just checked and someone deleted the lot without reading the instructions. Aaargghh! -- 80.42.236.111 ( talk) 09:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the gnome work on Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada's Oil Sands. I would have given you water (the most useful drink of all) but I figured beer is more fun. And water wasn't in the choices :) — CharlieEchoTango — 07:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
I actually agree with the previous post that GWS should be listed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Australian_Football_League_premiers&diff=454019880&oldid=454018151 Ray-Rays 00:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my error, Jenks. Old age creeping up. Tony (talk) 13:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
....how about a nice Leffe? Thanks for this edit in Talk:Wallonia-Brussels Federation. Asavaa ( talk) 19:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed my request at Requested moves following your suggestion that a better redirect is possible. I just wanted to inform you so you won't think it impolite that I removed your comment along with mine because I think the issue is resolved. Best regards Hekerui ( talk) 16:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I have opened an RfC related to an issue on which you recently commented: Wikipedia_talk:Selected_anniversaries#Year_wikilinking_in_OTD. Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24. You participated in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Standard of review for non admin closes, which was snowball closed. A subsection of the discussion has been created. Titled Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs, it pertains to {{ Request close}} and Category:Requests for Close, which were created after a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 78#Template to request a discussion be closed. I have posed several questions there and am interested in your thoughts. Cunard ( talk) 06:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Jenks24/Archive 4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
08:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Just nominated 2010 Nobel Peace Prize again. Could you help me with this problem, please? -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Amazing. I would have thought he'd have written his own page by now! The-Pope ( talk) 15:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the peer review on Freddie Mitchell. I really appreciate it, and I'll work on your suggestions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for merely having reverted Megan Fairchild, but the previous editor is running a script and lacks the good manners or common sense to clean up after himself — and I've grown tired — and perhaps a bit cranky — at having to clean up after him — or her, but it's a fair bet that script kiddies are boys. — Robert Greer ( talk) 13:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Jenks,
I saw that you moved the page now titled Paraguayan War. As I have noted in the article's talk page ( Talk:Paraguayan War), the premise provided was erroneous (false). Google page hits are actually four times (4x) greater for "War of the Triple Alliance" than "Paraguayan War". The term "Paraguayan War" is mainly used in Brazil to refer to this conflict...whereas the term "War of the Triple Alliance" is prefered in most other countries. As such, assuming that the person which suggested the move did it in good faith, I really think that this mistake should be promptly fixed (return the page back to "War of the Triple Alliance"). Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | Talk 21:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This is a generic message that I am sending to all of the Wikipedia contributors who have aired their views on this deletion debate. Since you last contributed your perspective, the article has been significantly expanded. You may wish to change, alter or expand your argument in light of these developments at the discussion page. Thanks. SplashScreen ( talk) 21:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey. To further complicate things, The Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers says 21 September 1926. I'd go with the AFL website [1] which goes with 1923 (scroll down to "player profiles"). Cheers. Jevansen ( talk) 04:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Comes free with the HTML4 manual! ASCIIn2Bme ( talk) 13:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Yoghurt". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by June 6, 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting my blanking of the redirect page for C. A. Patrides. I move pages a few times a year. Kiefer. Wolfowitz 21:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I was to inform you by phone but your contact number was unavailable. This is regarding the page of Jayden Head. I am head of Jayden's management and we are furious that you are saying that Jayden's goals and achievements are 'fake'. This is disrespectful for Jayden and for the football clubs he has played for. If this page cannot be verified as being 'true' we will have to pursue this further. We want many people to see Jayden's story of coming from a small town and working extremely hard to achieve greatness but we do not want to see this as being fake and Jayden being humilated. So please either fix this page with many references to make this page worthy of what it should be or contact me personally and we will sort something out.
Regards, Scott Matherson, PFA Licensed Player Agent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaYDawG 74 ( talk • contribs) 02:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Jayden Head has been signed to a notable football team in the Hyundai A-League and is also has been loaned to a team that has played in the Adelaide Super League so even though he has not played a game yet he still has been signed to these notable football teams. I believe also that Albury United S.C. is also a notable team in the Albury Wodonga Football Association and it cleary says he has recieved many votes for Star Player. I believe that yes this page must be fixed but not deleted and I am just asking for assistance in this as we don't want this page recieved as being 'fake' when it isn't so if we can have assistance in making this page true, it would be muchly apreciated. I sent the previous message that I sent to you to another Administrator and he has seen it as a threat. It is not a threat I am just asking for assistance in this page to be true. Thankyou for replying to my previous message. Regards, Scott Matherson, PFA Licensed Player Agent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaYDawG 74 ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 22:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for further reviewing Cheers (Drink to That) :) Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 23:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello, I am not from Australia but have aggressively advocated keeping articles on notable Australian topics. However, this article is a WP:BLP disaster in its current form. So, if you add a few solid, reliable sources that give significant biographical coverage, and eliminate the BLP violations, I will withdraw my "delete" vote. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For helping improve the prose in 1+1 so that it would hopefully pass its GA review. Thank you for your kindness and patience. Only i know how many editors i had requested before you did the copy-edit. Keep up the good work and for me, you're definitely one of the most valued copy-editors from now. Again and again, my heartfelt thanks to you. Jivesh boodhun ( talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 17:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC) |
OK, I've made some small tweaks. In all, it was pretty good and there wasn't much I could improve on. That said, I do understand why you wanted me to have a look at that section. Sometimes it feels simply like a collection of separate incidents/performances/parodies with no real flow, which is what the really good FAs have. I've done all I really can for that section, though—if it needs to be better to meet the FA criteria, then I'm afraid you will need a better copyeditor than myself. Best, Jenks24 ( talk) 19:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I've created a full nomination for the aircraft categories you nominated for Speedy renaming. Feel free to comment on the new nomination. I haven't retagged the categories, as the link from Speedy should suffice.-- Mike Selinker ( talk) 13:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Jenks, that was very kind of you. And I should have realised this was the process ... muddle-headed me. Pity it's a virtually unused category <blushes>.
I've never looked through that CFDS page: C2B looks strange, dealing first things that seem to be contradictory:
B. A rename enforcing established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices.
Should it be "contracting" instead of "expanding"? Tony (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
It does concern me in category lists when I see book and company titles as article titles when they look like concepts. I'm tempted to insert "(book)" or "(company)", but don't because this is apparently frowned on. Tony (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Also interesting about books and companies that appear to be concepts. The problem is that to add "(book)", the actual article actually has to be renamed to add "(book)" because the categories only reflect article titles (and that goes against being concise). What would be useful would be if the listings in categories could be made to realise when the article title is in italics and reflect that – wouldn't help for companies, but it would for books. But that is something that would probably take a lot of technical know-how to implement. Jenks24 ( talk) 02:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not get your point the first time around. Thanks for being patient and re-explaining it to me. I left another question on Talk:Frederico Chaves Guedes#Requested move. Also, would you care to comment on Talk:Thiago Emiliano da Silva#Requested move, a slightly similar case, but in this case, all the other footballers with similar name went with slightly different spelling. — MT ( talk) 06:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Are you able to offer some input to this ? -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't know what to do about this weird article, which could well be an opinion piece, aside from adding a few tags to it. What's your opinion? Tony (talk) 08:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the John Munro naming discussion. I've put the last two cases up for requested move again, and you might want to contribute again. Schwede 66 04:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are in good health. My friend asked me for help. He wanted me to re-write something but i just kept reading it without figuring a better way of re-writing:
Jessica Biel, Timberlake's then-girlfriend, was reportedly upset with her boyfriend because of the sexual chemistry between him and Rihanna during the filming of the video.[44] Tim Nixon of The Sun concurred, writing: "[The video] can't be easy for Chris Brown and Jessica Biel to watch. The red hot chemistry between their respective partners Rihanna and Justin Timberlake in the pop stars' new video must be hard to stomach."[45] Speaking to Access Hollywood, Timberlake described the experience of shooting the video: "I got there and I was like really? I'm the guy in the video. So, I had to give them all insecurities about that. But yeah we had a great time, we goofed around at the shoot most of the time.""
>>>This seems like a "showbiz" column / writeup.' - as stated by the peer reviewer.
The article is here. ★Jivesh 1205★ ( talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 07:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
It was reported by Digital Spy that Jessica Biel, Timberlake's girlfriend at the time, was "fuming" at Timberlake because of the sexual chemistry between he and Rihanna in the video. Tim Nixon of The Sun concurred, writing that the "red hot chemistry" between Rihanna and Timberlake must be difficult for their partners, Chris Brown and Biel respectively, to watch. [It would be great if we could then have a source saying something along the lines of "nothing happened, the tabloids have blown this out of proportion", but if not *shrug*.] Speaking to Access Hollywood, Timberlake described the enjoyable experience he had while filming the video, saying that most of the shoot was spent "goof[ing] around".
Hello Jenks.
A month or so ago, there was a multiple move of some pages concerning the volleyball team members lists in the 2008 Summer Olympics.
In the move discussion, you insisted that, in a volleyball context, "squad" was preferred over "team roster". There was no input from other editors, so I took your word for it. But now, having checked the source in the Volleyball at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's squads, I couldn't help but notice that it in fact refers to the teams as "team rosters".
I'm now wondering if the page names here should be reconsidered. What is your view? What do you have to back your claim up with, so to speak, that it should be squads and not team rosters. I mean, if it's only for the consistency with respect to previous years, then (pages of) the previous years could be renamed for consistency. It means more work, that's for sure, but what are we here for?
Cheers.
HandsomeFella ( talk) 19:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Jenks. Thank You for the c/e of the music video paragraph, a favor that Jivesh asked from you. I also appreciate the c/e. When I look at the sentence that you left note, you are right, it's kind off stupid :). Can you read the synopsis and tell me how to re-write the sentence. Thank You — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 22:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I've made a few tweaks and replied at the FAC. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit at Talk:Ursuline Convent, I presume making a fix. Though I am a bit puzzled; your message says " don't subst that template". On my first edit I didn't, but then I saw the template itself had the text "Do not simply add this template to page-move requests; instead, use {{subst:Requested move}} or {{subst:move-multi}}", so I reedited to substitute as the template told me. It looks like conflicting messages, or am I missing something? Wondering, Infrogmation ( talk) 01:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I posted eight (I think it was 8) more redirects for action. Just checked and someone deleted the lot without reading the instructions. Aaargghh! -- 80.42.236.111 ( talk) 09:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the gnome work on Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada's Oil Sands. I would have given you water (the most useful drink of all) but I figured beer is more fun. And water wasn't in the choices :) — CharlieEchoTango — 07:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
I actually agree with the previous post that GWS should be listed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Australian_Football_League_premiers&diff=454019880&oldid=454018151 Ray-Rays 00:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my error, Jenks. Old age creeping up. Tony (talk) 13:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
....how about a nice Leffe? Thanks for this edit in Talk:Wallonia-Brussels Federation. Asavaa ( talk) 19:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed my request at Requested moves following your suggestion that a better redirect is possible. I just wanted to inform you so you won't think it impolite that I removed your comment along with mine because I think the issue is resolved. Best regards Hekerui ( talk) 16:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I have opened an RfC related to an issue on which you recently commented: Wikipedia_talk:Selected_anniversaries#Year_wikilinking_in_OTD. Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24. You participated in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Standard of review for non admin closes, which was snowball closed. A subsection of the discussion has been created. Titled Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs, it pertains to {{ Request close}} and Category:Requests for Close, which were created after a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 78#Template to request a discussion be closed. I have posed several questions there and am interested in your thoughts. Cunard ( talk) 06:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Jenks24/Archive 4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
08:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Just nominated 2010 Nobel Peace Prize again. Could you help me with this problem, please? -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Amazing. I would have thought he'd have written his own page by now! The-Pope ( talk) 15:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the peer review on Freddie Mitchell. I really appreciate it, and I'll work on your suggestions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for merely having reverted Megan Fairchild, but the previous editor is running a script and lacks the good manners or common sense to clean up after himself — and I've grown tired — and perhaps a bit cranky — at having to clean up after him — or her, but it's a fair bet that script kiddies are boys. — Robert Greer ( talk) 13:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Jenks,
I saw that you moved the page now titled Paraguayan War. As I have noted in the article's talk page ( Talk:Paraguayan War), the premise provided was erroneous (false). Google page hits are actually four times (4x) greater for "War of the Triple Alliance" than "Paraguayan War". The term "Paraguayan War" is mainly used in Brazil to refer to this conflict...whereas the term "War of the Triple Alliance" is prefered in most other countries. As such, assuming that the person which suggested the move did it in good faith, I really think that this mistake should be promptly fixed (return the page back to "War of the Triple Alliance"). Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | Talk 21:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This is a generic message that I am sending to all of the Wikipedia contributors who have aired their views on this deletion debate. Since you last contributed your perspective, the article has been significantly expanded. You may wish to change, alter or expand your argument in light of these developments at the discussion page. Thanks. SplashScreen ( talk) 21:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey. To further complicate things, The Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers says 21 September 1926. I'd go with the AFL website [1] which goes with 1923 (scroll down to "player profiles"). Cheers. Jevansen ( talk) 04:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Comes free with the HTML4 manual! ASCIIn2Bme ( talk) 13:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Yoghurt". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by June 6, 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting my blanking of the redirect page for C. A. Patrides. I move pages a few times a year. Kiefer. Wolfowitz 21:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I was to inform you by phone but your contact number was unavailable. This is regarding the page of Jayden Head. I am head of Jayden's management and we are furious that you are saying that Jayden's goals and achievements are 'fake'. This is disrespectful for Jayden and for the football clubs he has played for. If this page cannot be verified as being 'true' we will have to pursue this further. We want many people to see Jayden's story of coming from a small town and working extremely hard to achieve greatness but we do not want to see this as being fake and Jayden being humilated. So please either fix this page with many references to make this page worthy of what it should be or contact me personally and we will sort something out.
Regards, Scott Matherson, PFA Licensed Player Agent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaYDawG 74 ( talk • contribs) 02:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Jayden Head has been signed to a notable football team in the Hyundai A-League and is also has been loaned to a team that has played in the Adelaide Super League so even though he has not played a game yet he still has been signed to these notable football teams. I believe also that Albury United S.C. is also a notable team in the Albury Wodonga Football Association and it cleary says he has recieved many votes for Star Player. I believe that yes this page must be fixed but not deleted and I am just asking for assistance in this as we don't want this page recieved as being 'fake' when it isn't so if we can have assistance in making this page true, it would be muchly apreciated. I sent the previous message that I sent to you to another Administrator and he has seen it as a threat. It is not a threat I am just asking for assistance in this page to be true. Thankyou for replying to my previous message. Regards, Scott Matherson, PFA Licensed Player Agent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaYDawG 74 ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)