This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
OK, so you added the notability warning for the show; I'm not really a rabid fan nor a critic of the show, but I think the variety show's notable enough, as evidenced by its IMDB profile, adding to the fact that the PhilSports Arena stampede incident involving the show was listed in Guinness World Records... Blake Gripling ( talk) 23:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Greetings. You placed a warning on my talk page User_talk:JimBobUSA. Care to explain why? Jim ( talk) 20:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Anyway...is it alright to move your "warning" that you gave me, for copy/pasting the insult that was directed at me? Mistakes do happen ;) Jim ( talk) 22:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you made some edits to my Yankees fan userbox over the past month. Please do not modify userboxes within a specific user's userspace. You can create your own userboxes if you do not like the ones that other users have created. Also, I know that the logo looks very nice but copyrighted logos are not allowed to be used in userboxes. Thank you - cgilbert( talk| contribs) 23:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
You're definition of vandalism hardly qualifies as such. You're just sore b/c your Giants template design is not valid. Logos cannot be used, or any brand design that resembles a trademarked logo.
You obviously need to read the definition of vandalism: Wikipedia:Vandalism
I never compromised the integrity of Wikipedia, and you are wrong and pompous to assume such a thing. You are not the ultimate authority, so do not threaten me.
I suggest you read this: Wikipedia:Civility
Also, just to prove that the helmet design is trademarked, see this page: [2] Deliberately skewing the image doesn't change its copyright. That is exactly why they exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JaMikePA ( talk • contribs) 03:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
It is easy to place a box frivolously on someone's page, like this:
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be
blocked for disruption.
Stop posing as an admin, as am well aware you have no power to block me. Even if you were an admin, your way of imposing policy is grossly unjust and violates Wikipedia policy. There are ways around that, too. I can recommend to have you blocked by an admin for your flaming comments, but that's all anyone can do if they're not an admin. Also, three warnings are required before a last warning is issued. You violate policy by posting a final warning as an initial one. You are dead wrong for deliberately breaking policy, assuming that I would know none the better. Shame on you. JaMikePA ( talk) 02:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Why do you keep editing/altering/adding-to my talk page without asking my permission first? Leaving a conversational post or asking my advise is certainly cool.(Lot of people come to me for help with Wikipedia) But Pat has rv'd 2 edits which altered the look/content/message of the page and were not OK'd by me. 156.34.142.110 ( talk) 11:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Looks great... thanks! 156.34.142.110 ( talk) 13:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
You're calling MY edits to the Mystery Method page biased?
The current page is WORD-WORD-WORD what is on the Venusian Arts website and Erik von Markovik's official statement. It is also factually untrue, as the links to the actual court documents demonstrate. Those same claims were broguht TWICE to state and federal court and denied both times.
I'm trying to get something int here that reflects both sides. Why don't you read what I actually wrote and tell me what in there in actually inaccurate or biased? Or have you decided to take Erik's side of the issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.140.107 ( talk) 20:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Lanlp 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>
).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 05:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have declined the PROD you put on the above article. I think that there is a pretty stong consensus that all human settlements are valid article topics. Dsmdgold ( talk) 16:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:List of Languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
What vandalism are you talking about?
Also, please do not not spam my inbox with your threats and please stop posing as an admin.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.242.128 ( talk) 06:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The TLS edit was not by me; the Konkurs edit was because the original (unsourced) sentence did not make sense(the Milan/HOT came after the AT-4/AT-5). I'm here to improve articles not vandalize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.242.128 ( talk) 20:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I will consider it, but for now I will extend the olive branch and say that I do not want be suspected of malicious intent. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.242.128 ( talk) 22:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cox Communications Logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 19:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I removed this report from AIV as it did not seem like a case of obvious vandalism to me. Perhaps if the IP continues to re-insert unsourced information then a WP:AN3 report may be better. Cheers TigerShark ( talk) 20:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Often, prior to signing in, I get warnings from you. Is there any way I can find out what I am being warned about? I used to forget to sign in in the past, but I think that I am getting much better. I do try to remember to enter sources and I would say that I am better than average concerning providing a reason for making the entry/edit each time. I will admit that I do not provide a source for mispellings and typos I find. I just fix them. I tend to work with articles about World War II. Many of the existing articles I come upon are clearly translations by someone who may not speak English all that well. Many of these articles indicate that Wikipedia would like some help in cleaning up the text. However, it seems like whenever I try to do so, I get a warning from "Jeff G.". I am open to improvement and I suspect I may be receiving automated warnings. Please let me know what I can do. Thank you. Mkpumphrey ( talk) 16:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cox Communications Logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 07:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jeff. My article 'Youth United' was deleted under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I have gone through the details for this and I found that the answer to the question why its subject is important or significant, is implied by the full article, particularly, headings of philosophy, vision, and mission statement really imply the answer to the same question. Youth United is a registered Non Governmental Organization, as Rotary International or Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The only difference is that they are quite reputed and old. Youth United solely works for the betterment of Society and Youth and it does not have any profit making motive as per its Constitution. Moreover everything was written from a neutral perspective. Had it not been the case, everything about the past events, activities and tabloids would have been flooded in the article. It was avoided to make the article as neutral as possible. Everything written was written to make the article informative and inform the general mass about Youth United and its missions and objectives which in turn have absolute nature of Community welfare. This article is to propagate the mission statement of Youth United and not the Youth United itself. If required I can send you the official charter and bye laws of Youth United. However you can also let me know as what all should be incorporated in the article to make it agreeable to wikipedia policies. really soliciting your cooperation, Regards, Extolmonica ( talk) 15:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new pic with all the necessary information. Extolmonica ( talk) 15:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
OK, so you added the notability warning for the show; I'm not really a rabid fan nor a critic of the show, but I think the variety show's notable enough, as evidenced by its IMDB profile, adding to the fact that the PhilSports Arena stampede incident involving the show was listed in Guinness World Records... Blake Gripling ( talk) 23:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Greetings. You placed a warning on my talk page User_talk:JimBobUSA. Care to explain why? Jim ( talk) 20:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Anyway...is it alright to move your "warning" that you gave me, for copy/pasting the insult that was directed at me? Mistakes do happen ;) Jim ( talk) 22:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you made some edits to my Yankees fan userbox over the past month. Please do not modify userboxes within a specific user's userspace. You can create your own userboxes if you do not like the ones that other users have created. Also, I know that the logo looks very nice but copyrighted logos are not allowed to be used in userboxes. Thank you - cgilbert( talk| contribs) 23:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
You're definition of vandalism hardly qualifies as such. You're just sore b/c your Giants template design is not valid. Logos cannot be used, or any brand design that resembles a trademarked logo.
You obviously need to read the definition of vandalism: Wikipedia:Vandalism
I never compromised the integrity of Wikipedia, and you are wrong and pompous to assume such a thing. You are not the ultimate authority, so do not threaten me.
I suggest you read this: Wikipedia:Civility
Also, just to prove that the helmet design is trademarked, see this page: [2] Deliberately skewing the image doesn't change its copyright. That is exactly why they exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JaMikePA ( talk • contribs) 03:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
It is easy to place a box frivolously on someone's page, like this:
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be
blocked for disruption.
Stop posing as an admin, as am well aware you have no power to block me. Even if you were an admin, your way of imposing policy is grossly unjust and violates Wikipedia policy. There are ways around that, too. I can recommend to have you blocked by an admin for your flaming comments, but that's all anyone can do if they're not an admin. Also, three warnings are required before a last warning is issued. You violate policy by posting a final warning as an initial one. You are dead wrong for deliberately breaking policy, assuming that I would know none the better. Shame on you. JaMikePA ( talk) 02:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Why do you keep editing/altering/adding-to my talk page without asking my permission first? Leaving a conversational post or asking my advise is certainly cool.(Lot of people come to me for help with Wikipedia) But Pat has rv'd 2 edits which altered the look/content/message of the page and were not OK'd by me. 156.34.142.110 ( talk) 11:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Looks great... thanks! 156.34.142.110 ( talk) 13:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
You're calling MY edits to the Mystery Method page biased?
The current page is WORD-WORD-WORD what is on the Venusian Arts website and Erik von Markovik's official statement. It is also factually untrue, as the links to the actual court documents demonstrate. Those same claims were broguht TWICE to state and federal court and denied both times.
I'm trying to get something int here that reflects both sides. Why don't you read what I actually wrote and tell me what in there in actually inaccurate or biased? Or have you decided to take Erik's side of the issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.140.107 ( talk) 20:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Lanlp 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>
).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 05:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have declined the PROD you put on the above article. I think that there is a pretty stong consensus that all human settlements are valid article topics. Dsmdgold ( talk) 16:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:List of Languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
What vandalism are you talking about?
Also, please do not not spam my inbox with your threats and please stop posing as an admin.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.242.128 ( talk) 06:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The TLS edit was not by me; the Konkurs edit was because the original (unsourced) sentence did not make sense(the Milan/HOT came after the AT-4/AT-5). I'm here to improve articles not vandalize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.242.128 ( talk) 20:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I will consider it, but for now I will extend the olive branch and say that I do not want be suspected of malicious intent. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.242.128 ( talk) 22:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cox Communications Logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 19:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I removed this report from AIV as it did not seem like a case of obvious vandalism to me. Perhaps if the IP continues to re-insert unsourced information then a WP:AN3 report may be better. Cheers TigerShark ( talk) 20:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Often, prior to signing in, I get warnings from you. Is there any way I can find out what I am being warned about? I used to forget to sign in in the past, but I think that I am getting much better. I do try to remember to enter sources and I would say that I am better than average concerning providing a reason for making the entry/edit each time. I will admit that I do not provide a source for mispellings and typos I find. I just fix them. I tend to work with articles about World War II. Many of the existing articles I come upon are clearly translations by someone who may not speak English all that well. Many of these articles indicate that Wikipedia would like some help in cleaning up the text. However, it seems like whenever I try to do so, I get a warning from "Jeff G.". I am open to improvement and I suspect I may be receiving automated warnings. Please let me know what I can do. Thank you. Mkpumphrey ( talk) 16:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cox Communications Logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 07:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jeff. My article 'Youth United' was deleted under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I have gone through the details for this and I found that the answer to the question why its subject is important or significant, is implied by the full article, particularly, headings of philosophy, vision, and mission statement really imply the answer to the same question. Youth United is a registered Non Governmental Organization, as Rotary International or Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The only difference is that they are quite reputed and old. Youth United solely works for the betterment of Society and Youth and it does not have any profit making motive as per its Constitution. Moreover everything was written from a neutral perspective. Had it not been the case, everything about the past events, activities and tabloids would have been flooded in the article. It was avoided to make the article as neutral as possible. Everything written was written to make the article informative and inform the general mass about Youth United and its missions and objectives which in turn have absolute nature of Community welfare. This article is to propagate the mission statement of Youth United and not the Youth United itself. If required I can send you the official charter and bye laws of Youth United. However you can also let me know as what all should be incorporated in the article to make it agreeable to wikipedia policies. really soliciting your cooperation, Regards, Extolmonica ( talk) 15:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new pic with all the necessary information. Extolmonica ( talk) 15:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)