Wow you are just so incredibly cool i cant comprehend
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Halo 3 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our
core policies. Thank you. —
TKD::
Talk
03:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- The point is that, since there's no uniform definition of "very positive", how much is "very" is subjective, and a matter that Wikipedia shouldn't go into; let the reviews speak for themselves and let the reader decide. That's the essence of neutral point of view.
- As another angle to this issue, from a standpoint of effective prose, many writing style guides discourage the use of adverbs like "very", "quite", and so forth because their effect is imprecise and vague. — TKD:: Talk 11:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Wow you are just so incredibly cool i cant comprehend
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Halo 3 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our
core policies. Thank you. —
TKD::
Talk
03:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- The point is that, since there's no uniform definition of "very positive", how much is "very" is subjective, and a matter that Wikipedia shouldn't go into; let the reviews speak for themselves and let the reader decide. That's the essence of neutral point of view.
- As another angle to this issue, from a standpoint of effective prose, many writing style guides discourage the use of adverbs like "very", "quite", and so forth because their effect is imprecise and vague. — TKD:: Talk 11:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)