|
Please see WP:OVERLINK, which says not to link low-value terms that most people know. Also, please do not a) undo others' revisions without a proper edit summary explaining your action and b) continually revert without discussion. Dabomb87 ( talk) 21:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see
Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thank you.
Erzsébet Báthory(
talk|
contr.)
00:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Until It Sleeps Wake me 21:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I am not going to revert you again, but this is not acceptable: removing your own comments is one thing, but removing another's is not done. Drmies ( talk) 18:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
You could try to have better manners in your edit summaries. Drmies ( talk) 20:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Please see WP:OVERLINK, which says not to link low-value terms that most people know. Also, please do not a) undo others' revisions without a proper edit summary explaining your action and b) continually revert without discussion. Dabomb87 ( talk) 21:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see
Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thank you.
Erzsébet Báthory(
talk|
contr.)
00:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Until It Sleeps Wake me 21:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I am not going to revert you again, but this is not acceptable: removing your own comments is one thing, but removing another's is not done. Drmies ( talk) 18:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
You could try to have better manners in your edit summaries. Drmies ( talk) 20:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)