![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion | |
---|---|
![]() |
![]()
|
I chimed in here. What was the eventual verdict on Wikibilim? Did Jimmy retract anything? Peter Damian ( talk) 18:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
PS Just reading through this very long thread. Peter Damian ( talk) 18:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
I see you are working on Citogenesis. Good stuff. Guilt by Wikipedia: How Joe Streater Became Falsely Attached To The Boston College Point Shaving Scandal is a clear case of blatant misinformation getting cited everywhere, but it's not technically citogenesis since the external references never found their way back into Wikipedia. Indeed, the pre-revert version has no citations at all. I wonder if there could be a section for cases like this? Peter Damian ( talk) 20:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
This page should now be visible. Not all are sourced to reliable sources though (unless my blog counts as a reliable source Peter Damian ( talk) 19:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion | |
---|---|
![]() |
![]()
|
I chimed in here. What was the eventual verdict on Wikibilim? Did Jimmy retract anything? Peter Damian ( talk) 18:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
PS Just reading through this very long thread. Peter Damian ( talk) 18:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
I see you are working on Citogenesis. Good stuff. Guilt by Wikipedia: How Joe Streater Became Falsely Attached To The Boston College Point Shaving Scandal is a clear case of blatant misinformation getting cited everywhere, but it's not technically citogenesis since the external references never found their way back into Wikipedia. Indeed, the pre-revert version has no citations at all. I wonder if there could be a section for cases like this? Peter Damian ( talk) 20:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
This page should now be visible. Not all are sourced to reliable sources though (unless my blog counts as a reliable source Peter Damian ( talk) 19:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)