![]() | This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jayab314/Archive_1. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayab314. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed this edit and wanted to tell you to never be afraid to ask questions! As for the answer, no one knows for sure. There could be some sort of Jury twist as you mentioned there was a time in the past when America got a vote in the Jury. There was also a time in BB18 when the Jury had a Battle Back and the winning Jury member got to return to the game. So for now we'll just have to wait and find out. It shouldn't be too long. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
User:Jayab314, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jayab314 and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:Jayab314 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Whpq (
talk)
15:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jayab314. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that Ava and Bolaven are not a part of the 2018 TCs since they formed in 2017. Please refrain from adding them in the future. Noah Talk 17:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Idk about you, but the basin category seems to bloat the table a bit. I did have to remove the information you added to the EPAC section since the section is about the atmospheric and hydrological conditions that led to TC formation. Noah Talk 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
No, that was 93P... 93P became 08P when JTWC upgraded it to a TS. It was then named by BOM today. Noah Talk 22:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Hurricane Noah: Hey, if you look at the edits on Tropical Cyclones in 2019, I just had to fix some major problems because... well you'll see. Would you help me "monitor" the page to make sure it doesn't happen again, I told them to look at the Bolaven and Ava thing in the 2018 article to see why I did it but yeah, we need to make sure this doesn't keep happening. Jayab314 ( talk) 01:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
You should have waited until MeteoFrance officially declared the tropical storm, which it did just a few minutes ago. The JTWC is not the source of information for that; also, the wind speeds are in knots not mph. Please adhere strictly to what MeteoFrance says; take only 1-minute sustained winds from JTWC.-- Jasper Deng (talk) 12:31, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept! |
![]() |
Noah Talk 03:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Jayab314,
Thanks for creating Big Brother Canada (season 7)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn ( talk) 16:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
So, if you go to the Big Brother Canada (season 7) article and scroll down, you'll see the Have-Not, Shortlist, and Voting history sections. IP editors keep making the same edit that I have to keep reverting. I have discussed this on the article's talk page, but I've got no responses. I've also put it in each of my reverts' edit notes and still they keep doing it. I have no idea how to talk with them since they're IP editors. Now, I am in an edit war and don't know what to do. These are the disputes:
Obviously, this dispute has gone too far and I don't know what to do anymore. I have discussed this on the talk page, no response. I have discussed this in the edit notes, no notes back in their reverts. I have put the hidden notes in the actual article right next to each problem, they get deleted. Please help! Jayab314 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
@ RhinosF1: Yes, alright. Thanks for your help! Jayab314 17:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Wie is de Mol? (season 8), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
14:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
You told me to stop changing Sam to Samantha because the rule is the page should match the chyron in the show. Well the chyron in the show has always said Samantha and not Sam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.78.10.136 ( talk) 01:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Charles & Tati Controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Charles & Tati Controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) 13:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 37 Noah Talk 22:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
The article The Circle (U.S. TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The show seems to be in the casting stages at the moment (see official website). Text of the article is copied from The Circle (UK TV series).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ...
discospinster
talk
14:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - June 2019 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sent by DannyS712 ( talk) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - July 2019 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reviewer's Barnstar | |
This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATH SLOPU 13:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Murray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Venus ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I did not mean to vandalize the page for Survivor: Island of the Idols. I wanted to include an extra row for the merged tribe, but I couldn't add an outline for the finish row. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.184.176 ( talk) 23:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Nice to meet you ~ |
~ you know ~ ever since I took the
Evelyn Woodhead Speed Reading Course my gammer ~ grammer~ grammar ~ has deteriorated 100% ~ thanks for your grammar edits ~
~mitch~ ( talk) 01:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC) |
The article Survivor: Winners at War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article uses sources from a singular spoiler site, Inside Survivor. The other site sourced, Reality Blurred, also uses information from Inside Survivor. The screenshot Instagram post with a picture of a logo also cannot be used as a valid source, since 1) the person in question is clearly a tourist who just met Steven Bradbury, not affiliated with CBS, 2) does not state "Winners at War" is the fortieth season", and 3) is a screenshot of the Instagram post, which could mean that it make doctored (either by Photoshop or through the Source Editor). The last time an article for Survivor used only sources from Inside Survivor, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor: Edge of Extinction, it was stated that "sources that have been presented were shown to not be WP:RS".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sinjoh2015 (
talk)
17:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Survivor: Winners at War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor: Winners at War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan work 08:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jayab314/Archive_1. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayab314. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed this edit and wanted to tell you to never be afraid to ask questions! As for the answer, no one knows for sure. There could be some sort of Jury twist as you mentioned there was a time in the past when America got a vote in the Jury. There was also a time in BB18 when the Jury had a Battle Back and the winning Jury member got to return to the game. So for now we'll just have to wait and find out. It shouldn't be too long. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
User:Jayab314, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jayab314 and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:Jayab314 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Whpq (
talk)
15:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jayab314. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that Ava and Bolaven are not a part of the 2018 TCs since they formed in 2017. Please refrain from adding them in the future. Noah Talk 17:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Idk about you, but the basin category seems to bloat the table a bit. I did have to remove the information you added to the EPAC section since the section is about the atmospheric and hydrological conditions that led to TC formation. Noah Talk 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
No, that was 93P... 93P became 08P when JTWC upgraded it to a TS. It was then named by BOM today. Noah Talk 22:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Hurricane Noah: Hey, if you look at the edits on Tropical Cyclones in 2019, I just had to fix some major problems because... well you'll see. Would you help me "monitor" the page to make sure it doesn't happen again, I told them to look at the Bolaven and Ava thing in the 2018 article to see why I did it but yeah, we need to make sure this doesn't keep happening. Jayab314 ( talk) 01:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
You should have waited until MeteoFrance officially declared the tropical storm, which it did just a few minutes ago. The JTWC is not the source of information for that; also, the wind speeds are in knots not mph. Please adhere strictly to what MeteoFrance says; take only 1-minute sustained winds from JTWC.-- Jasper Deng (talk) 12:31, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept! |
![]() |
Noah Talk 03:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Jayab314,
Thanks for creating Big Brother Canada (season 7)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn ( talk) 16:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
So, if you go to the Big Brother Canada (season 7) article and scroll down, you'll see the Have-Not, Shortlist, and Voting history sections. IP editors keep making the same edit that I have to keep reverting. I have discussed this on the article's talk page, but I've got no responses. I've also put it in each of my reverts' edit notes and still they keep doing it. I have no idea how to talk with them since they're IP editors. Now, I am in an edit war and don't know what to do. These are the disputes:
Obviously, this dispute has gone too far and I don't know what to do anymore. I have discussed this on the talk page, no response. I have discussed this in the edit notes, no notes back in their reverts. I have put the hidden notes in the actual article right next to each problem, they get deleted. Please help! Jayab314 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
@ RhinosF1: Yes, alright. Thanks for your help! Jayab314 17:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Wie is de Mol? (season 8), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
14:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
You told me to stop changing Sam to Samantha because the rule is the page should match the chyron in the show. Well the chyron in the show has always said Samantha and not Sam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.78.10.136 ( talk) 01:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Charles & Tati Controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Charles & Tati Controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) 13:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 37 Noah Talk 22:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
The article The Circle (U.S. TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The show seems to be in the casting stages at the moment (see official website). Text of the article is copied from The Circle (UK TV series).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ...
discospinster
talk
14:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - June 2019 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sent by DannyS712 ( talk) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - July 2019 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reviewer's Barnstar | |
This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATH SLOPU 13:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Murray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Venus ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I did not mean to vandalize the page for Survivor: Island of the Idols. I wanted to include an extra row for the merged tribe, but I couldn't add an outline for the finish row. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.184.176 ( talk) 23:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Nice to meet you ~ |
~ you know ~ ever since I took the
Evelyn Woodhead Speed Reading Course my gammer ~ grammer~ grammar ~ has deteriorated 100% ~ thanks for your grammar edits ~
~mitch~ ( talk) 01:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC) |
The article Survivor: Winners at War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article uses sources from a singular spoiler site, Inside Survivor. The other site sourced, Reality Blurred, also uses information from Inside Survivor. The screenshot Instagram post with a picture of a logo also cannot be used as a valid source, since 1) the person in question is clearly a tourist who just met Steven Bradbury, not affiliated with CBS, 2) does not state "Winners at War" is the fortieth season", and 3) is a screenshot of the Instagram post, which could mean that it make doctored (either by Photoshop or through the Source Editor). The last time an article for Survivor used only sources from Inside Survivor, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor: Edge of Extinction, it was stated that "sources that have been presented were shown to not be WP:RS".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sinjoh2015 (
talk)
17:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Survivor: Winners at War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor: Winners at War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan work 08:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)