Hello, JayKayXD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 21:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Mosasaurus, you may be
blocked from editing. Stop changing the length unless you have a source that says so.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 19:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
When a majority of the contributions that you make to Wikipedia are getting reverted, whether you agree with the reasons or not, it is time to stop and think. It is possible that the whole world is "out to get you". More likely, something you are doing is not quite right. Good editors will give you a clue in the undo message. Better yet, discussion is always better than starting an edit war, then you can find out what the problems are before you get blocked. 20:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Also, you wanted me to have a reasonable discussion with me instead of an edit war, ok. I will leave a message on your page soon. that's all. Best wishes. JayKayXD ( talk) 00:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I encourage you to cease your attempts on placing MY Cephei onto the top of the list. This is cherrypicking and does not represent the fact that the radius of the star is uncertain. Going by only the most recent value is not an appropriate method. Now, I know you may ask, "Why is VY Canis Majoris so high then?". That is because, the reference that gives the value of 2,069 R☉ is a whole eight years more recent than the reference that gave the value of solar radius of 1,420 ± 120 R☉. That is more than enough to replace old data with new data. Did anyone hesitate to remove the Humphreys 2006 value of 1,800–2,100 R☉ when Wittkowski et al. 2012 was published? Of course not. However, the reference that gave MY Cephei the radius of 1,134 R☉ is only two years older than the reference that gave MY Cephei the radius of 2,061 R☉. And now, you've moved the star back to the top of the list, with it's lower estimate, even though you should know we sort the list by lowest value first. Discussion with Lithopsian came to not much avail, because (no disrespect to Lithopsian) I cannot discuss with someone who is not willing to discuss in the first place. Everytime I tried to discuss, I would either receive no response at all or he would beat around the bush not addressing of the points of discussion. However, Lithopsian did state this on the Talk:VX Sagittarii: "It would certainly be good to have a more modern range of values". This statement was talking about the temperature, but it is perfectly applicable to the radius as well. We need the most recent range of values, not just the most recent. Faren29 ( talk) 13:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, JayKayXD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 21:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Mosasaurus, you may be
blocked from editing. Stop changing the length unless you have a source that says so.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 19:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
When a majority of the contributions that you make to Wikipedia are getting reverted, whether you agree with the reasons or not, it is time to stop and think. It is possible that the whole world is "out to get you". More likely, something you are doing is not quite right. Good editors will give you a clue in the undo message. Better yet, discussion is always better than starting an edit war, then you can find out what the problems are before you get blocked. 20:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Also, you wanted me to have a reasonable discussion with me instead of an edit war, ok. I will leave a message on your page soon. that's all. Best wishes. JayKayXD ( talk) 00:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I encourage you to cease your attempts on placing MY Cephei onto the top of the list. This is cherrypicking and does not represent the fact that the radius of the star is uncertain. Going by only the most recent value is not an appropriate method. Now, I know you may ask, "Why is VY Canis Majoris so high then?". That is because, the reference that gives the value of 2,069 R☉ is a whole eight years more recent than the reference that gave the value of solar radius of 1,420 ± 120 R☉. That is more than enough to replace old data with new data. Did anyone hesitate to remove the Humphreys 2006 value of 1,800–2,100 R☉ when Wittkowski et al. 2012 was published? Of course not. However, the reference that gave MY Cephei the radius of 1,134 R☉ is only two years older than the reference that gave MY Cephei the radius of 2,061 R☉. And now, you've moved the star back to the top of the list, with it's lower estimate, even though you should know we sort the list by lowest value first. Discussion with Lithopsian came to not much avail, because (no disrespect to Lithopsian) I cannot discuss with someone who is not willing to discuss in the first place. Everytime I tried to discuss, I would either receive no response at all or he would beat around the bush not addressing of the points of discussion. However, Lithopsian did state this on the Talk:VX Sagittarii: "It would certainly be good to have a more modern range of values". This statement was talking about the temperature, but it is perfectly applicable to the radius as well. We need the most recent range of values, not just the most recent. Faren29 ( talk) 13:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)