![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, JavierMC/Archives/2008, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Happy editing! Sincerely,
Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
Tally-ho!
18:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
My misunderstanding of different spellings between American English and British English see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (spelling) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
How dare you? My
WP:POV edits? I researched the interchange of --ize and --ise before I made any edits and all the sources I could find returned the spelling is --ize. Your non-
WP:CIVIL remarks in your above message to me are supposed to chastise me into following appropriate Wiki behavior when you can not follow it yourself? It does not say that I have been editing for 1 year, 8 months and 14 day. It says I have been a wikipedian for that period of time, representing my membership of Wikipedia for that period of time. Do not in the future come to my talk page and leave such offensive statements concerning my intelligence. You do not know me, my background or my education and I will not even demean myself by enlightening you on the subject! Show me some references to where recognised and recognized are interchangeable.
![]()
Jmedinacorona (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
|
Further discussion on American/British English usage by another editor which ends in his attempt to take it engage in harassment |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
reg: your edit in south ossetia war abt. removing 's' and replacing with 'z'..
i am writing this not bcoz i made that edit (i didnt), but bcoz i believe english is flexible enough in wikipedia as long as grave grammatical errors dont occur! so, showing tolerance, i m not reverting your edit since i have made my point here Cityvalyu ( talk) 23:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Discussion concerning an article talk page deletion. Settled with me agreeing to strike out the statement, not delete. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
NPOV does not require that I do all the work that there is to be done on a page. The page was very long, and I was both unwilling and unable to remove all of the inappropriate posts made on it. This does not mean that any of those posts or yours was any less inappropriate. Your post was inappropriate, and therefore was fit to be removed. If something is fit to be removed, then it should be. One of the fundamental aspects of Wikipedia is that people share the burden of editing the content of pages. I did my part by removing your post. For the record, if you go back through the archives of that talk page, you will come across other instances in which I similarly removed comments by other users. Even if I had not done so, it would not have been a POV to remove your post, but I did do so. I mean you no disrespect and bear no animosity, but it was necessary to remove your post due to its nature, and it is important that people be free to remove inappropriate posts without accusation of POV in doing so, especially given that the accusation does not change whether the originally removed post was inappropriate or not. Christiangoth ( talk) 03:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Heated debate concerning 2008 South Ossetia war with Cityvalyu. Taught me a thing or two about WP:Civil |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
am undoing your revert since it gives toomuch importance to one of the brigadier's in georgia ..Not fit for a lead intro.. Cityvalyu ( talk) 12:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC) nevertheless ,see edit summary to know why i reverted.. Cityvalyu ( talk) 12:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC) please also see the reply to your post in my talk page Cityvalyu ( talk) 12:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC) npov: remove/ be specificbe specific..in what way you consider it non neutral..(is the georgian point of view the only neutral view??)..explain your edit to add that template in south ossetia war... Cityvalyu ( talk) 14:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC) edit war
Warning
References
vandalismyou have changed "tshinvalli hospital"(reference says so) to actual hospital(original research with weasel word) despite talk page clarification..now you accuse me of vandalism!! is quoting reference vandalism? is restoring neutral (non us/georgian/russian version) point vandalism?..my friends used to say children of pro**** or such morally corrupt characters have no remorse to speak immoral lies blatantly..though i dont subscribe to that view entirely, i personally have noticed many criminals doing the same and later getting caught when the truth ultimately emerges out..please understand that you need not be like those shady characters and have the option of rather apologising for lying that a "valid edit" as "vandalism"..why did you reinsert wrong facts without consensus or proving the used word's verifiability Cityvalyu ( talk) 01:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Another debate concerning the POV of an editor who believed that a non-English speaking countries dating format should prevail on en.wikipedia |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Please look at this page, and decide if you will endorse an RfC on Skyring. That involves signing to assert that a dispute exists. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
|
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, JavierMC/Archives/2008, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Happy editing! Sincerely,
Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
Tally-ho!
18:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
My misunderstanding of different spellings between American English and British English see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (spelling) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
How dare you? My
WP:POV edits? I researched the interchange of --ize and --ise before I made any edits and all the sources I could find returned the spelling is --ize. Your non-
WP:CIVIL remarks in your above message to me are supposed to chastise me into following appropriate Wiki behavior when you can not follow it yourself? It does not say that I have been editing for 1 year, 8 months and 14 day. It says I have been a wikipedian for that period of time, representing my membership of Wikipedia for that period of time. Do not in the future come to my talk page and leave such offensive statements concerning my intelligence. You do not know me, my background or my education and I will not even demean myself by enlightening you on the subject! Show me some references to where recognised and recognized are interchangeable.
![]()
Jmedinacorona (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
|
Further discussion on American/British English usage by another editor which ends in his attempt to take it engage in harassment |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
reg: your edit in south ossetia war abt. removing 's' and replacing with 'z'..
i am writing this not bcoz i made that edit (i didnt), but bcoz i believe english is flexible enough in wikipedia as long as grave grammatical errors dont occur! so, showing tolerance, i m not reverting your edit since i have made my point here Cityvalyu ( talk) 23:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Discussion concerning an article talk page deletion. Settled with me agreeing to strike out the statement, not delete. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
NPOV does not require that I do all the work that there is to be done on a page. The page was very long, and I was both unwilling and unable to remove all of the inappropriate posts made on it. This does not mean that any of those posts or yours was any less inappropriate. Your post was inappropriate, and therefore was fit to be removed. If something is fit to be removed, then it should be. One of the fundamental aspects of Wikipedia is that people share the burden of editing the content of pages. I did my part by removing your post. For the record, if you go back through the archives of that talk page, you will come across other instances in which I similarly removed comments by other users. Even if I had not done so, it would not have been a POV to remove your post, but I did do so. I mean you no disrespect and bear no animosity, but it was necessary to remove your post due to its nature, and it is important that people be free to remove inappropriate posts without accusation of POV in doing so, especially given that the accusation does not change whether the originally removed post was inappropriate or not. Christiangoth ( talk) 03:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Heated debate concerning 2008 South Ossetia war with Cityvalyu. Taught me a thing or two about WP:Civil |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
am undoing your revert since it gives toomuch importance to one of the brigadier's in georgia ..Not fit for a lead intro.. Cityvalyu ( talk) 12:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC) nevertheless ,see edit summary to know why i reverted.. Cityvalyu ( talk) 12:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC) please also see the reply to your post in my talk page Cityvalyu ( talk) 12:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC) npov: remove/ be specificbe specific..in what way you consider it non neutral..(is the georgian point of view the only neutral view??)..explain your edit to add that template in south ossetia war... Cityvalyu ( talk) 14:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC) edit war
Warning
References
vandalismyou have changed "tshinvalli hospital"(reference says so) to actual hospital(original research with weasel word) despite talk page clarification..now you accuse me of vandalism!! is quoting reference vandalism? is restoring neutral (non us/georgian/russian version) point vandalism?..my friends used to say children of pro**** or such morally corrupt characters have no remorse to speak immoral lies blatantly..though i dont subscribe to that view entirely, i personally have noticed many criminals doing the same and later getting caught when the truth ultimately emerges out..please understand that you need not be like those shady characters and have the option of rather apologising for lying that a "valid edit" as "vandalism"..why did you reinsert wrong facts without consensus or proving the used word's verifiability Cityvalyu ( talk) 01:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Another debate concerning the POV of an editor who believed that a non-English speaking countries dating format should prevail on en.wikipedia |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Please look at this page, and decide if you will endorse an RfC on Skyring. That involves signing to assert that a dispute exists. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
|