Thanks for working on a revision of this article.
In response to your request on my Talk page for help/feedback about your draft revision of this article, I have some comments (more could follow):
Introduction section.
First sentence. I think this could be improved by a very brief explanation of the terms "chronostratigraphy" and "geochronology", in parentheses, in addition to their existing wikilinks.
"The current version of the ICC can be found at stratigraphy.org/chart." - should be moved to an External links section.
Terminology section.
According to the Manual of Style, bold font should not be used for emphasis (see MOS:BOLD). It is intended for section headings and targets of redirects. Emphasis should be achieved by italic font instead. i.e. for the terms: Chronostratigraphy, chronostratigraphic unit, Geochronology, geochronologic unit, Geochronometry, Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP), Global Standard Stratigraphic Age (GSSA).
— GeoWriter ( talk) 19:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for working on a revision of this article.
In response to your request on my Talk page for help/feedback about your draft revision of this article, I have some comments (more could follow):
Introduction section.
First sentence. I think this could be improved by a very brief explanation of the terms "chronostratigraphy" and "geochronology", in parentheses, in addition to their existing wikilinks.
"The current version of the ICC can be found at stratigraphy.org/chart." - should be moved to an External links section.
Terminology section.
According to the Manual of Style, bold font should not be used for emphasis (see MOS:BOLD). It is intended for section headings and targets of redirects. Emphasis should be achieved by italic font instead. i.e. for the terms: Chronostratigraphy, chronostratigraphic unit, Geochronology, geochronologic unit, Geochronometry, Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP), Global Standard Stratigraphic Age (GSSA).
— GeoWriter ( talk) 19:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)