Please feel free to chat, complain, whatever. Jaque Hammer ( talk) 22:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
There is no such article. Where would the confusion come from? --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 15:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Norman Thaddeus Vane. I have removed the source you complained about. Hopefully you are now satisfied? -- Cirt ( talk) 16:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
I saw this article, as a redirect to Fool, and realised the target was an inappropriate one (the meanings are not similar; neither article mentions the other). It got to this stage after you PRODded it and another editor changed to the redirect, implicitly contesting the prod thus preventing it being PRODded again. If you still wish for it to be debated/deleted I suggest AfD. I42 ( talk) 19:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
This is pretty borderline, jaque. I'm letting it go because it is borderline and arguments could be made either way. Note that the word farangi and its derivatives exists in several languages and its origin is not absolutely certain. People encountering 'farangi' in Hindi for example may simply want to look it up as a small succint Wikipedia article on its own (as I originally intended). Now, however, they have to plough through a long article on the Franks to find out the word origin. Hardly efficient. Lgh ( talk) 02:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Are you aware of WP:PROF? Perhaps you will want to withdraw the nomination, so we can do a speedy keep. DGG ( talk ) 22:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please feel free to chat, complain, whatever. Jaque Hammer ( talk) 22:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
There is no such article. Where would the confusion come from? --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 15:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Norman Thaddeus Vane. I have removed the source you complained about. Hopefully you are now satisfied? -- Cirt ( talk) 16:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
I saw this article, as a redirect to Fool, and realised the target was an inappropriate one (the meanings are not similar; neither article mentions the other). It got to this stage after you PRODded it and another editor changed to the redirect, implicitly contesting the prod thus preventing it being PRODded again. If you still wish for it to be debated/deleted I suggest AfD. I42 ( talk) 19:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
This is pretty borderline, jaque. I'm letting it go because it is borderline and arguments could be made either way. Note that the word farangi and its derivatives exists in several languages and its origin is not absolutely certain. People encountering 'farangi' in Hindi for example may simply want to look it up as a small succint Wikipedia article on its own (as I originally intended). Now, however, they have to plough through a long article on the Franks to find out the word origin. Hardly efficient. Lgh ( talk) 02:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Are you aware of WP:PROF? Perhaps you will want to withdraw the nomination, so we can do a speedy keep. DGG ( talk ) 22:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)