Hello, Janus von Abaton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Corballis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Corballis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fiddle
Faddle
12:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Michael Corballis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fiddle
Faddle
12:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to hear this. I am a German wikipedia author. And I contribute mainly to the German wikipedia in the field of language evolution and system theory. Mr. Corballis published 6 Books and is very important in the context of language evolution. In the German Wikipedia we have the criteria of 2 Book for a general Public as minimal. PLEASE HAVE A LOOK HOW MANY LINKS WILL GO TO THIS PAGE FORM WITHIN WIKIPEDIA. Janus von Abaton ( talk) 12:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Instead of blanking the original and creating a new one, please use the MOVE facility. This migrates the article and its talk page to the new title, and keeps all the history intact. Not only does this save you a lot of work, it is a Wikipedia 'rule'. The necessity is to preserve all the history for licencing purposes, something that some people even pretend to understand.
New users may not move articles until they have won their spurs, so to speak. But one can ask someone else to move the article in that case. Fiddle Faddle 12:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
I have two convincing arguments: he is an author of book for a general public (that means even if he would not pass the WP:ACADEMIC he should stay because he is an auther) and the other argument is that he is mentioned in various Wikipedia articls. Have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&redirs=1&profile=default&search=Corballis
If there would be 10 Links form Wikipedia pages to Michael Corballis, would it really make sense to delete it? Here you see the 10 Backlinks:
++* It is great to talk to you, because it is such a different tone and quite an experience! Well, the backlinks show that he is quoted a lot. And of cause it improves the article that there are 10 links. We have to distinguish between two questions: 1) is it a good article and 2) should there be an article on the subject. I can try to improve the article, but I am not a native speaker and also have a deadline coming up. But I just was surprised that there was not article about him though he is quoted in various papers I was reading. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=wM6qVlgAAAAJ&hl=de
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
oh! - Sorry, we handle this different on the German Wikipedia. See for example: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin. Best -- Janus von Abaton ( talk) 12:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Carlos Santana. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Janus von Abaton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Corballis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Corballis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fiddle
Faddle
12:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Michael Corballis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fiddle
Faddle
12:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to hear this. I am a German wikipedia author. And I contribute mainly to the German wikipedia in the field of language evolution and system theory. Mr. Corballis published 6 Books and is very important in the context of language evolution. In the German Wikipedia we have the criteria of 2 Book for a general Public as minimal. PLEASE HAVE A LOOK HOW MANY LINKS WILL GO TO THIS PAGE FORM WITHIN WIKIPEDIA. Janus von Abaton ( talk) 12:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Instead of blanking the original and creating a new one, please use the MOVE facility. This migrates the article and its talk page to the new title, and keeps all the history intact. Not only does this save you a lot of work, it is a Wikipedia 'rule'. The necessity is to preserve all the history for licencing purposes, something that some people even pretend to understand.
New users may not move articles until they have won their spurs, so to speak. But one can ask someone else to move the article in that case. Fiddle Faddle 12:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
I have two convincing arguments: he is an author of book for a general public (that means even if he would not pass the WP:ACADEMIC he should stay because he is an auther) and the other argument is that he is mentioned in various Wikipedia articls. Have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&redirs=1&profile=default&search=Corballis
If there would be 10 Links form Wikipedia pages to Michael Corballis, would it really make sense to delete it? Here you see the 10 Backlinks:
++* It is great to talk to you, because it is such a different tone and quite an experience! Well, the backlinks show that he is quoted a lot. And of cause it improves the article that there are 10 links. We have to distinguish between two questions: 1) is it a good article and 2) should there be an article on the subject. I can try to improve the article, but I am not a native speaker and also have a deadline coming up. But I just was surprised that there was not article about him though he is quoted in various papers I was reading. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=wM6qVlgAAAAJ&hl=de
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
oh! - Sorry, we handle this different on the German Wikipedia. See for example: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin. Best -- Janus von Abaton ( talk) 12:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Carlos Santana. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)