|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Mika Johnson has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Mika Johnson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://momentech.blogspot.cz/?view=snapshot/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
16:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I have reverted your changes to Mika Johnson. The content you added was far too promotionally written. Please do not say that someone is "award winning" without a very good, very specific reason. This is known as a peacock phrase. These sound impressive, but do not impart any usable information.
Additionally, please include reliable, independent sources for all additions. Since you are adding significant content without any sources, it appears you have first-hand knowledge, which strongly suggests a conflict of interest. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, if you'd like). If you have a conflict of interest, I strongly suggest posting suggestions to the article's talk page, instead of making the edit yourself.
Again, even if you do not have a conflict of interest, Wikipedia uses reliable sources instead of personal familiarity or original research, so please be prepared to cite reliable sources for all your additions. Thank you. Grayfell ( talk) 10:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jantompkins!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
19:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baďan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SNS.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Mika Johnson has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Mika Johnson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://momentech.blogspot.cz/?view=snapshot/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
16:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I have reverted your changes to Mika Johnson. The content you added was far too promotionally written. Please do not say that someone is "award winning" without a very good, very specific reason. This is known as a peacock phrase. These sound impressive, but do not impart any usable information.
Additionally, please include reliable, independent sources for all additions. Since you are adding significant content without any sources, it appears you have first-hand knowledge, which strongly suggests a conflict of interest. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, if you'd like). If you have a conflict of interest, I strongly suggest posting suggestions to the article's talk page, instead of making the edit yourself.
Again, even if you do not have a conflict of interest, Wikipedia uses reliable sources instead of personal familiarity or original research, so please be prepared to cite reliable sources for all your additions. Thank you. Grayfell ( talk) 10:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jantompkins!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
19:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baďan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SNS.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)