Hi, Welcome to my talk page!
![]() |
Hi Jan12shamil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC) |
I see that you have made several many accounts, might I ask why? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 19:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
<<Jan12shamil>> Cause one was disappearing after another
Hi Captain Eek! i created many accounts cause 1 was disappearing after another.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn B. Pantig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–– FormalDude talk 06:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ClaudineChionh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
J. Todd Coleman, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
ClaudineChionh (
talk)
06:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Harold Godwinson. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
06:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn B. Pantig, you may be
blocked from editing.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
07:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Andronikos V Palaiologos.
Curbon7 (
talk)
07:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Evelyn B. Pantig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Curbon7 ( talk) 07:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Curbon7 (
talk)
07:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 09:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Curbon7 (
talk)
07:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jan12shamil, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Hi, Welcome to my talk page!
![]() |
Hi Jan12shamil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC) |
I see that you have made several many accounts, might I ask why? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 19:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
<<Jan12shamil>> Cause one was disappearing after another
Hi Captain Eek! i created many accounts cause 1 was disappearing after another.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn B. Pantig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–– FormalDude talk 06:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ClaudineChionh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
J. Todd Coleman, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
ClaudineChionh (
talk)
06:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Harold Godwinson. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
06:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn B. Pantig, you may be
blocked from editing.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
07:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Andronikos V Palaiologos.
Curbon7 (
talk)
07:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Evelyn B. Pantig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Curbon7 ( talk) 07:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Curbon7 (
talk)
07:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 09:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Curbon7 (
talk)
07:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jan12shamil, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.