Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie ( talk) 11:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

can you prove that fact is wrong? James paul 74 ( talk) 12:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

the signal was traveled from Poldhu, Cornwall, in England to St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada. James paul 74 ( talk) 12:38, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Your site is not a usable source - and by adding your own site you are violating our policy on linkspamming. MrOllie ( talk) 12:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie ( talk) 12:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

read this /info/en/?search=Poldhu James paul 74 ( talk) 12:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

i read on that site Technicals solution so i add it to reference. whats an issue in this? James paul 74 ( talk) 12:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

if wikipedia use nofollow tags then whats the matter? why you are stopping me to add some additional inforamtion? James paul 74 ( talk) 12:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

You still have to follow our policies, which are linked in the above messages. MrOllie ( talk) 12:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

im following the policies. if the fact is wrong then you have right to revert the changes. if something is missing in that article and im adding something and citing it then whats wrong in it. How can you say its not a reliable source? James paul 74 ( talk) 12:56, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Spamming us with an unreliable source is not following the policies. If you continue you can expect that your account will be blocked. Consider this your final warning. MrOllie ( talk) 13:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

why you are considering it spamming? James paul 74 ( talk) 13:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Because it is a repeated attempt to add a link to a Wikipedia article which has no value for the encyclopedia, only for the link owner. _signed, Willondon ( talk) 13:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sam Kuru (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply