Hi,
I'm a user who is familiar with Wikipedia. I'll be editing (initially medical or other) pages where I or people I am close to have a real-life connection and I have found Wiki's information isn't as good as it could be. Because of possible conflict, I will not generally use my account for non-editing purposes or project pages; I will accept reverting or take disagreements to the talk page more quickly if an edit is disputed; I will try to take more care to add good quality sourced material in a neutral way; I will try to make sure articles represent scientifically or other well sourced information.
My interests are psychological disorders, UK places business and politics, care and welfare bodies like the DWP and NHS, and LGBT. I keep LGBT from my family so thank you for anonymous editing. My trigger for wanting to edit is coming back to the pages on Autism and ADHD, some cancers and eye issues, which are big topics but not great for someone trying to find out information for the first time.
If you can suggest ways to improve my editing, drop a note, James 173
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your edits at Dopamine. Please feel free to get in touch with me any time if you have any questions at all about editing here. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 19:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi James 173! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 04:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hi James! I have seen a couple of your edits. In some of them you write text without stating sources. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. With friendly regards, Lova Falk talk 10:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at User_talk:Lova Falk#Amino acid's talk page.
Hello. You have
a new message at User_talk:Lova Falk#Page rename's talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
James, thanks for expanding the FAP page. I do think that the content of the table could be reduced in size, perhaps by paraphrasing the direct quotes in summary style. JFW | T@lk 20:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm a user who is familiar with Wikipedia. I'll be editing (initially medical or other) pages where I or people I am close to have a real-life connection and I have found Wiki's information isn't as good as it could be. Because of possible conflict, I will not generally use my account for non-editing purposes or project pages; I will accept reverting or take disagreements to the talk page more quickly if an edit is disputed; I will try to take more care to add good quality sourced material in a neutral way; I will try to make sure articles represent scientifically or other well sourced information.
My interests are psychological disorders, UK places business and politics, care and welfare bodies like the DWP and NHS, and LGBT. I keep LGBT from my family so thank you for anonymous editing. My trigger for wanting to edit is coming back to the pages on Autism and ADHD, some cancers and eye issues, which are big topics but not great for someone trying to find out information for the first time.
If you can suggest ways to improve my editing, drop a note, James 173
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your edits at Dopamine. Please feel free to get in touch with me any time if you have any questions at all about editing here. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 19:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi James 173! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 04:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hi James! I have seen a couple of your edits. In some of them you write text without stating sources. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. With friendly regards, Lova Falk talk 10:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at User_talk:Lova Falk#Amino acid's talk page.
Hello. You have
a new message at User_talk:Lova Falk#Page rename's talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
James, thanks for expanding the FAP page. I do think that the content of the table could be reduced in size, perhaps by paraphrasing the direct quotes in summary style. JFW | T@lk 20:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)