Please read wp:talk, article talk pages are for discussing improving the article, not for use as a wp:soapbox tp air your views on us. Also edit requests are supposed to contain what you want done. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, offer solutions to improve the page is exactly what I did. You're the ones with the soapbox & as I pointed out earlier, it's embarrassing to humanity.
- No, you say "this text is wrong, this is my solution" you went "BIASED!". Per WP:RFC "Include a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue in the talk page section", what you posted was in no way neutrally worded. WP:WRFC "Don't try to boil an issue down to a simple principle." your RFC was just that, about a general principle, not a specific edit or suggestion. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Here you go:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9131977/Parler-squeezed-Trump-seeks-new-online-megaphone.html
You are using this platform to promote your personal political beliefs. Why should I have to tell you that is the wrong way to approach documenting any subject?
- You can, in the right place. But an articles talk page ids not for challengieng wider issues (and that is what you were doing, what you previce as wikipedias bias). If you want to challenge that wp:viulagepump might be place to start. We go with what wp:rs say. If you cannott abide by Wikipedias policies it might be best if you stop editing before you are prvented form being able to do so. Yes you may now take this as a waring. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I can show you anti-semitism posts on Twitter. Why isn't that in the first paragraph of their description? Because someone is promoting a political agenda, that's why. I would have to have been born yesterday to believe anything else, & I wasn't. JamesMartin03 ( talk) 13:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Read wp:or, wp:v and wp:rs, WE do not promote anything, we report what RS say. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Then clean up your act. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them, "conspiracy theorists, right-wing extremists, antisemites", etc., etc., anymore than members of, "Fabian Socialists, Socialist Workers' Party of Germany, Communist Party of the Russian Federation", etc., etc. JamesMartin03 ( talk) 14:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- No, but RS saying they are does according to OUR POLICIES. WE do not need to "clean up our act", you need to obey policy or end up wit ha block, its as simple as that. WE do not have to do anything. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Is this my last word, here, any more examples of wp:nothere and I will report you. Either obey our rules or leave. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi JamesMartin03! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC) |
Please read wp:talk, article talk pages are for discussing improving the article, not for use as a wp:soapbox tp air your views on us. Also edit requests are supposed to contain what you want done. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, offer solutions to improve the page is exactly what I did. You're the ones with the soapbox & as I pointed out earlier, it's embarrassing to humanity.
- No, you say "this text is wrong, this is my solution" you went "BIASED!". Per WP:RFC "Include a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue in the talk page section", what you posted was in no way neutrally worded. WP:WRFC "Don't try to boil an issue down to a simple principle." your RFC was just that, about a general principle, not a specific edit or suggestion. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Here you go:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9131977/Parler-squeezed-Trump-seeks-new-online-megaphone.html
You are using this platform to promote your personal political beliefs. Why should I have to tell you that is the wrong way to approach documenting any subject?
- You can, in the right place. But an articles talk page ids not for challengieng wider issues (and that is what you were doing, what you previce as wikipedias bias). If you want to challenge that wp:viulagepump might be place to start. We go with what wp:rs say. If you cannott abide by Wikipedias policies it might be best if you stop editing before you are prvented form being able to do so. Yes you may now take this as a waring. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I can show you anti-semitism posts on Twitter. Why isn't that in the first paragraph of their description? Because someone is promoting a political agenda, that's why. I would have to have been born yesterday to believe anything else, & I wasn't. JamesMartin03 ( talk) 13:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Read wp:or, wp:v and wp:rs, WE do not promote anything, we report what RS say. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Then clean up your act. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them, "conspiracy theorists, right-wing extremists, antisemites", etc., etc., anymore than members of, "Fabian Socialists, Socialist Workers' Party of Germany, Communist Party of the Russian Federation", etc., etc. JamesMartin03 ( talk) 14:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- No, but RS saying they are does according to OUR POLICIES. WE do not need to "clean up our act", you need to obey policy or end up wit ha block, its as simple as that. WE do not have to do anything. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Is this my last word, here, any more examples of wp:nothere and I will report you. Either obey our rules or leave. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hi JamesMartin03! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC) |