Hi Jamba Juicy, this is fun. Bnard1234 ( talk) 18:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi JambaJuicy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, JambaJuicy. On Wikipedia, we have something called WP:BRD (Bold, Revert, Discuss). You have boldly edited, Jytdog has Reverted your edits (because they were, and still are, based extensively on primary sources) and explained the reasons on talk, and we are now at Discuss stage. Rather than waiting for discussion, you have reinstated your edits, which breach Wikipedia's medical sourcing guidelines. Please have a look at WP:3RR and WP:EDITWAR, and do not continue to add text based on primary sources without discussion. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 02:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Posttraumatic stress disorder. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog ( talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, User:JambaJuicy. Just a note to say it was great working with you this semester!! I've accepted a position at another institution, but you should always feel free to contact me on my talk page, should you have any questions about editing or just want to say hi. Megs ( talk) 01:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hi Jamba Juicy, this is fun. Bnard1234 ( talk) 18:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi JambaJuicy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, JambaJuicy. On Wikipedia, we have something called WP:BRD (Bold, Revert, Discuss). You have boldly edited, Jytdog has Reverted your edits (because they were, and still are, based extensively on primary sources) and explained the reasons on talk, and we are now at Discuss stage. Rather than waiting for discussion, you have reinstated your edits, which breach Wikipedia's medical sourcing guidelines. Please have a look at WP:3RR and WP:EDITWAR, and do not continue to add text based on primary sources without discussion. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 02:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Posttraumatic stress disorder. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog ( talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, User:JambaJuicy. Just a note to say it was great working with you this semester!! I've accepted a position at another institution, but you should always feel free to contact me on my talk page, should you have any questions about editing or just want to say hi. Megs ( talk) 01:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!