![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
I have completed exam 3. PantherLeapord ( talk) 00:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
This vandalism one has been tricky for me (have never done any of it). I have read the class and copied 3 links to "possible" (and I do use that term VERY loosely as this stage of the game) vandalism. I think you got your work cut out for you explaining this stuff to me. I am laughing right now and hope you can hear that I am most def having an interesting time with this one. Ok I await your feedback. I am going to read and re read the lesson and do some research of my own on how I might be able to spot vandalism a bit better. Thanks Jackson TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jackson, the technical klutz that I am, I just enrolled in your course as a student rather than as an online volunteer. Do you know how I can unenroll as a student? Thanks. By the way, at some point this week, I can make a half-hour or so to discuss in either IRC or Google Talk. Email me. Go Phightins ! 21:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Alrightie, I have completed exam three, except for the vandal links portion. I left the links to the 3 diffs discussed in the lesson at the top of the exam in the introduction area. I didn't change any vandalism that I found and put the links in the exam because I thought it best that I understand what I am doing first. I thank you kindly for your patience with me. Exam page here TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 22:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
I have completed exam 4. PantherLeapord ( talk) 23:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Done in full by adding the 3 vandal diffs (before i made change) Then made c=changes and added templates to the vandals user talk pages as required. my exam page TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 04:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
For showing my appreciation for being such supportive, encouraging and friendly editor. Thanks ! Avinendra ( talk) 22:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC) |
I have a few questions about this lesson. I am really clueless =( and I actually thought I knew a little something. Grrrr. This lesson is about how to use the Twinkle options correct? 1. Anyway first issue is the talkback I tried to use the twinkle to leave a talkback on that exam page but it went to your user talk page (Not there anymore because I deleted it) so i went and looked up the talkback templates to do that which totally defeats the purpose of the twinkle. 2. I dont see a "tag" section in the twinkle? I went to the link provided in the lesson for maintenance tags and am still confused. Is tag the same as template? I know how to add a template that says something to the effect "this page lacks sufficient sources please help by adding reliable... blah blah blah" Would that be a maintenance tag? But still how do i get to it using twinkle? Quote of the day "The only stupid question is the one you never ask." ~My Dad TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 22:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I have completed exam 6. PantherLeapord ( talk) 23:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 02:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
guten Appetit ! Ghorpaapi ( talk) 09:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
i would like to know why you have taken my recent statment off , because its TRUE! many thanks david oaks.
Done with exam 4 YAY User:Jackson Peebles/Adoption/Tattoodwaitress Exam 4 TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought I should let you know that I learned something new (thanks to you). I used the chat channel to ask a question for the first time, and learned that by clicking the actual ip address for a user in the recent changes that i can see all their edits. That was so confusing me trying to figure out how to follow a particular vandal. Got it now though. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 16:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I have completed exam 2. Awaiting for your review. Avinendra ( talk) 10:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Avinendra ( talk) 21:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Though I understand the meaning of vandalism I am not where to search because all of them are already marked as vandalism by some user or bots. Please I need some more help before taking my third exam. Avinendra ( talk) 21:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I am ready for exam 5 whenever you get around to it is cool. No hurry, I am going to work on some disambigs, maybe some prowling for vandals, and other minor stuff. You must be busy and I hope you are having a wonderful week. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Happy I did well on this one. The reason I chose the obit template is because I had to laugh when I first saw it. Morbid yes, but the funny thing is (to me anyway) why on earth would someone write an article that reads like an obit? Guess I was trying to be funny. Ah, anyhow I hope your weekend leaves you time to relax from your "packed" week. Thank you for posting exam 5. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jackson,
Seeing how your adoption programme is going, I was wondering if you'd be interested in starting a CVUA course on similar lines along with me.. I'm interested in having one curriculum for CVUA so that we can channel most trainees in the academy there, so that more than one CVUA adopter can look into their course and guide them. Would you be interested?
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 15:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
As above; I have completed exam 7. PantherLeapord ( talk) 07:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought that was easy so I am really keeping my fingers crossed. Finished exam 5 TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 22:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Would you be willing to adopt me?-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 00:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
I am not even close to done but am working so hard on this (it is taking me forever) and figured I better get some feedback just in case I am wasting my time on something that won't get to stay here on wiki due to notability issues. I for one am thrilled that I have even started writing a first article from scratch all by myself and I believe this an inspiring topic. Anyhow would you take a look for me? Joe "Tiger" Patrick II Thank you TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert my post? It is the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by AN0NYM0U5135792468 ( talk • contribs) 05:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
While I may have use for this permission in the future for my work with the Education Program, I have not had to use the account creator permission a single time to date, as all of my students have just created their own accounts, and I wish to avoid having this right for security purposes and to avoid having others seek me out for assistance in creating an account when I am not knowledgeable about ACC on the toolserver. I do wish to keep all of my other rights, which I use regularly. Should I need the right in the future, I wish to have the documentation on this page, hence the admin help template rather than just pinging an admin, so I apologize for any inconvenience that I may have caused! Thank you! -- Jackson Peebles ( talk) 04:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 03:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I have finished exam 8. PantherLeapord ( talk) 01:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I left two messages here may be in two different sections though one below the other. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm currently trying to gain consensus on the galaxy's current blueshift speed. Would you be willing to take a look at the ref i left on the article's talk page and determine whether the galaxy's blueshift speed should be changed?-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I have another draft that I had started which I have had a bunch of help on but wanted you to check it out. One of the editors that is helping me on this thought it might be ready for main space but i would love to have you look at for me when you get a moment. I don't want to be in a hurry. Thank you for all you you do and for the awesome way that you give feedback stating the positives along with the negatives. I for one really appreciate not only knowing what i need to change or do differently but what I have done well. It is a self esteem booster and helps me to know that I am growing as an editor too. Much appreciated. And I sure hope that I can remember that when I give suggestions or feedback! "Once you replace negative thoughts with positive ones, you'll start having positive results." Willie Nelson TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 18:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jackson Peebles! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot ( talk) 03:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I have cited the information about the Blueshift speed. I also fixed the reference.-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Good morning, regarding the article Joe "Tiger" Patrick II. I have been in contact with Mr. Patrick regarding an image for the article. He has actually given permission for me to use a particular picture in the article. He is going to contact the newspaper photographer who took the picture and get their permission as well so I don't have to use the fair use clause. What should I tell him needs to be done on his part? Does he need to send me an email or what? He doesn't have a whole lot of access to computers (he is still on his walk), his phone service isn't always all that great, and he doesn't like to use too much battery power between stops. In other words what do i need from him that proves i have his permission? Right now, all I have is text messages and phone calls. Last contact with him i just told him to let me know what the photographer says, but would like to be able to tell him what he needs to do when he gets back to me. Thanks TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 15:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Note* I actually found the copyright release form for the photographer so have that ready to send when/if I need to. Is there something like that for the living person in the image as well? TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 16:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Knighton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Peebles
In review of your choice to remove my "addendum" about the Wayne RD-9000, I feel your edit/removal was uninformed. As it is, I am the owner of the prototype vehicle, and I will keep the information of said vehicle to myself until further notice. I was just trying to let readers see that at least one of the prototypes exists to this day. I should been contacted to verify my addendum. I will not dispute your removal as it is a waste of my time.
Wayne RD9000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wayne RD9000 ( talk • contribs) 09:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I see that you are not that well at the moment. As such I shall delay my taking of the final until you are feeling better to reduce your workload. Get well soon! PantherLeapord ( talk) 05:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for creating this course, how are you going? Loving it so far even though I just started haha. Hopefully I can hold my interest in this to completion. Might learn a thing or two, hell might even learn three! You just never know. Best Wishes and Warm Regards. Kagalive1985 ( talk) 14:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I've finished my most recent exam! -- Kagalive1985 ( talk) 14:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Magick. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution. Please note that this article is in the draft phase on my user page, and therefore it is not ready for scrutiny. I have pre-populated numerous articles with the Task Force 60 link, so this Task Force 60 article will not be orphaned. Also, I will populate this article with the categories appropriate for U.S. naval task forces. I ask that you don't jump the gun and allow me to launch this article when it is ready. Marcd30319 ( talk) 12:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
You wrote:
>Hello, I'm Jackson Peebles. I wanted to let you know that I undid one
>or more of your recent contributions to README because it did not
>appear constructive.
Please elaborate how adding README.1ST and History isn't constructive?
And how Summarizing my edit as "(identified as test/vandalism using STiki)"
What is STiki?
I'm a human being that has been there, and done that. I ran IBM 360
mainframes and DEC PDP-8s and PDP-11s with 16 K of core and 256BPI
magnetic tapes for NASA. My first home computer was a 6 foot tall
rack of equipment that plugged into the 220 V electric stove outlet
in the kitchen.
My fifth home computer was a 16KB IBM PC (serial number under 400)
>If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions,
>you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jackson Peebles (talk)
>21:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I speak from experience. I've seen README.1ST files, README.DOC and
!README files on DECUS tapes from the 1970s.
How is adding "README.1ST" as "Information that you need to read before
you get to the General Information" considered "test / vandalism"?
How is adding "Some readme files have been seen with !README as the
first part of the filename to take advantage of the sorting - the "!"
(exclamation point) character sorts ahead of "A" and would be the
first file in the directory list." considered "test / vandalism"?
I mounted and read
DECUS tapes on PDP-11s at NASA/JPL in Pasadena.
The DECUS software (like the compilers) was frequently better than the DEC stuff.
The DOC suffix indicated "DOCumentation" in the 1970s, long before
the IBM PC was introduced in 1981. Word didn't show up until 1983.
Yes, Microsoft hijacked the DOC suffix. They could have used WRD for Word.
If you want to use a less inflammatory term that "hijacked", go ahead.
Wikipedia is supposed to be an online encyclopedia. An encyclopedia
has history in it. I added history:
- "The first time this contributor saw a "readme" file was on a
- Digital Equipment Computer Users' Society
DECUS free software
- magnetic tape around 1970 or 71. It was a single file on the
- beginning of the tape, containing notes about the tape itself,
- a list of contributors and their contact information, and
- then several paragraphs documenting each contributed file.
−
− Anybody have any older history?
How is adding something that is a part of Wikipedia considered vandalism - especially
when I'm ASKING for additional knowledgeable contributions to an article? Us
old farts are dying off and our knowledge and history is dying with us.
You reverted my contribution. Fine. Let's go through my contribution,
item by item, and see what parts you have issues with. Let's resolve
this.
Post your response here and I'll check this page tonight (Sunday) or tomorrow.
173.51.10.223 (
talk)
18:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
I respect the fact that you're a human being and have been there and done that. In fact, there's a good likelihood that you know computers substantially better than I do. However, I am going to have to insist that you cite your sources, do not use loaded words against corporations without evidence that their actions fit the definition of "hijacking," and meets the manual of style. Had the edit been such that I could have fixed it, I would have. However, not one of your additions was sourced. I urge you to consider my comment on your talk page rather than the edit summary, which is meant to be an explanation of what I did (and it did accurately - I reverted an edit that I identified as vandalism). Your edit was unconstructive. It did not improve the encyclopedia. At the time of my initial reading, it appeared as though there was both vandalism ("hijack") and testing (asking the question). In hindsight, perhaps I should have assumed good faith, but I stand by my analysis of your edit.
If you can add citations, references, use proper formatting, and use the talk page, I'll be happy to permit your edits. Please feel free to ask me in the future if you have any questions about policy, which I consider myself relatively well-versed in. I do ask that, on my talk page, you do not page break with every sentence, though, simply for the sake of aesthetics. If you find issue with my response, you may seek dispute resolution. -- Jackson Peebles ( talk) 19:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Jackson Peebles. Saw your pledge at the Typo Team. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. See you around! Cheers, Jason
AutomaticStrikeout
? is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Auto-Archive Requested: Jackson Peebles ( talk) 07:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Auto-Archive Requested: Jackson Peebles ( talk) 07:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I only will edit Lukaku not play for Pelister, its fake. He play for Chelsea. SSorry for bad enghlish.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kosovo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey there, Jackson. Thanks for the feedback. You guessed correctly; both of these articles are works in progress! Recently, I've been working hard on topics related to the history of the Virginia General Assembly, and I appreciate your words of praise as well as your suggestions. I added some refs to Saunders, but I'm gonna hold off a bit before putting inline citations in the other one, as there's still some more things I want to add. Definitely on my to-do list. Cheers. Rockhead126 ( talk) 07:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
I have completed exam 3. PantherLeapord ( talk) 00:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
This vandalism one has been tricky for me (have never done any of it). I have read the class and copied 3 links to "possible" (and I do use that term VERY loosely as this stage of the game) vandalism. I think you got your work cut out for you explaining this stuff to me. I am laughing right now and hope you can hear that I am most def having an interesting time with this one. Ok I await your feedback. I am going to read and re read the lesson and do some research of my own on how I might be able to spot vandalism a bit better. Thanks Jackson TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jackson, the technical klutz that I am, I just enrolled in your course as a student rather than as an online volunteer. Do you know how I can unenroll as a student? Thanks. By the way, at some point this week, I can make a half-hour or so to discuss in either IRC or Google Talk. Email me. Go Phightins ! 21:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Alrightie, I have completed exam three, except for the vandal links portion. I left the links to the 3 diffs discussed in the lesson at the top of the exam in the introduction area. I didn't change any vandalism that I found and put the links in the exam because I thought it best that I understand what I am doing first. I thank you kindly for your patience with me. Exam page here TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 22:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
I have completed exam 4. PantherLeapord ( talk) 23:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Done in full by adding the 3 vandal diffs (before i made change) Then made c=changes and added templates to the vandals user talk pages as required. my exam page TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 04:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
For showing my appreciation for being such supportive, encouraging and friendly editor. Thanks ! Avinendra ( talk) 22:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC) |
I have a few questions about this lesson. I am really clueless =( and I actually thought I knew a little something. Grrrr. This lesson is about how to use the Twinkle options correct? 1. Anyway first issue is the talkback I tried to use the twinkle to leave a talkback on that exam page but it went to your user talk page (Not there anymore because I deleted it) so i went and looked up the talkback templates to do that which totally defeats the purpose of the twinkle. 2. I dont see a "tag" section in the twinkle? I went to the link provided in the lesson for maintenance tags and am still confused. Is tag the same as template? I know how to add a template that says something to the effect "this page lacks sufficient sources please help by adding reliable... blah blah blah" Would that be a maintenance tag? But still how do i get to it using twinkle? Quote of the day "The only stupid question is the one you never ask." ~My Dad TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 22:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I have completed exam 6. PantherLeapord ( talk) 23:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 02:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
guten Appetit ! Ghorpaapi ( talk) 09:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
i would like to know why you have taken my recent statment off , because its TRUE! many thanks david oaks.
Done with exam 4 YAY User:Jackson Peebles/Adoption/Tattoodwaitress Exam 4 TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought I should let you know that I learned something new (thanks to you). I used the chat channel to ask a question for the first time, and learned that by clicking the actual ip address for a user in the recent changes that i can see all their edits. That was so confusing me trying to figure out how to follow a particular vandal. Got it now though. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 16:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I have completed exam 2. Awaiting for your review. Avinendra ( talk) 10:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Avinendra ( talk) 21:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Though I understand the meaning of vandalism I am not where to search because all of them are already marked as vandalism by some user or bots. Please I need some more help before taking my third exam. Avinendra ( talk) 21:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I am ready for exam 5 whenever you get around to it is cool. No hurry, I am going to work on some disambigs, maybe some prowling for vandals, and other minor stuff. You must be busy and I hope you are having a wonderful week. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Happy I did well on this one. The reason I chose the obit template is because I had to laugh when I first saw it. Morbid yes, but the funny thing is (to me anyway) why on earth would someone write an article that reads like an obit? Guess I was trying to be funny. Ah, anyhow I hope your weekend leaves you time to relax from your "packed" week. Thank you for posting exam 5. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jackson,
Seeing how your adoption programme is going, I was wondering if you'd be interested in starting a CVUA course on similar lines along with me.. I'm interested in having one curriculum for CVUA so that we can channel most trainees in the academy there, so that more than one CVUA adopter can look into their course and guide them. Would you be interested?
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 15:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
As above; I have completed exam 7. PantherLeapord ( talk) 07:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought that was easy so I am really keeping my fingers crossed. Finished exam 5 TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 22:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Would you be willing to adopt me?-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 00:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
I am not even close to done but am working so hard on this (it is taking me forever) and figured I better get some feedback just in case I am wasting my time on something that won't get to stay here on wiki due to notability issues. I for one am thrilled that I have even started writing a first article from scratch all by myself and I believe this an inspiring topic. Anyhow would you take a look for me? Joe "Tiger" Patrick II Thank you TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert my post? It is the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by AN0NYM0U5135792468 ( talk • contribs) 05:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
While I may have use for this permission in the future for my work with the Education Program, I have not had to use the account creator permission a single time to date, as all of my students have just created their own accounts, and I wish to avoid having this right for security purposes and to avoid having others seek me out for assistance in creating an account when I am not knowledgeable about ACC on the toolserver. I do wish to keep all of my other rights, which I use regularly. Should I need the right in the future, I wish to have the documentation on this page, hence the admin help template rather than just pinging an admin, so I apologize for any inconvenience that I may have caused! Thank you! -- Jackson Peebles ( talk) 04:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 03:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I have finished exam 8. PantherLeapord ( talk) 01:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I left two messages here may be in two different sections though one below the other. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm currently trying to gain consensus on the galaxy's current blueshift speed. Would you be willing to take a look at the ref i left on the article's talk page and determine whether the galaxy's blueshift speed should be changed?-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I have another draft that I had started which I have had a bunch of help on but wanted you to check it out. One of the editors that is helping me on this thought it might be ready for main space but i would love to have you look at for me when you get a moment. I don't want to be in a hurry. Thank you for all you you do and for the awesome way that you give feedback stating the positives along with the negatives. I for one really appreciate not only knowing what i need to change or do differently but what I have done well. It is a self esteem booster and helps me to know that I am growing as an editor too. Much appreciated. And I sure hope that I can remember that when I give suggestions or feedback! "Once you replace negative thoughts with positive ones, you'll start having positive results." Willie Nelson TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 18:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jackson Peebles! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot ( talk) 03:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I have cited the information about the Blueshift speed. I also fixed the reference.-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Good morning, regarding the article Joe "Tiger" Patrick II. I have been in contact with Mr. Patrick regarding an image for the article. He has actually given permission for me to use a particular picture in the article. He is going to contact the newspaper photographer who took the picture and get their permission as well so I don't have to use the fair use clause. What should I tell him needs to be done on his part? Does he need to send me an email or what? He doesn't have a whole lot of access to computers (he is still on his walk), his phone service isn't always all that great, and he doesn't like to use too much battery power between stops. In other words what do i need from him that proves i have his permission? Right now, all I have is text messages and phone calls. Last contact with him i just told him to let me know what the photographer says, but would like to be able to tell him what he needs to do when he gets back to me. Thanks TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 15:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Note* I actually found the copyright release form for the photographer so have that ready to send when/if I need to. Is there something like that for the living person in the image as well? TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 16:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Knighton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Peebles
In review of your choice to remove my "addendum" about the Wayne RD-9000, I feel your edit/removal was uninformed. As it is, I am the owner of the prototype vehicle, and I will keep the information of said vehicle to myself until further notice. I was just trying to let readers see that at least one of the prototypes exists to this day. I should been contacted to verify my addendum. I will not dispute your removal as it is a waste of my time.
Wayne RD9000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wayne RD9000 ( talk • contribs) 09:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I see that you are not that well at the moment. As such I shall delay my taking of the final until you are feeling better to reduce your workload. Get well soon! PantherLeapord ( talk) 05:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for creating this course, how are you going? Loving it so far even though I just started haha. Hopefully I can hold my interest in this to completion. Might learn a thing or two, hell might even learn three! You just never know. Best Wishes and Warm Regards. Kagalive1985 ( talk) 14:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I've finished my most recent exam! -- Kagalive1985 ( talk) 14:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Magick. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution. Please note that this article is in the draft phase on my user page, and therefore it is not ready for scrutiny. I have pre-populated numerous articles with the Task Force 60 link, so this Task Force 60 article will not be orphaned. Also, I will populate this article with the categories appropriate for U.S. naval task forces. I ask that you don't jump the gun and allow me to launch this article when it is ready. Marcd30319 ( talk) 12:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
You wrote:
>Hello, I'm Jackson Peebles. I wanted to let you know that I undid one
>or more of your recent contributions to README because it did not
>appear constructive.
Please elaborate how adding README.1ST and History isn't constructive?
And how Summarizing my edit as "(identified as test/vandalism using STiki)"
What is STiki?
I'm a human being that has been there, and done that. I ran IBM 360
mainframes and DEC PDP-8s and PDP-11s with 16 K of core and 256BPI
magnetic tapes for NASA. My first home computer was a 6 foot tall
rack of equipment that plugged into the 220 V electric stove outlet
in the kitchen.
My fifth home computer was a 16KB IBM PC (serial number under 400)
>If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions,
>you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jackson Peebles (talk)
>21:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I speak from experience. I've seen README.1ST files, README.DOC and
!README files on DECUS tapes from the 1970s.
How is adding "README.1ST" as "Information that you need to read before
you get to the General Information" considered "test / vandalism"?
How is adding "Some readme files have been seen with !README as the
first part of the filename to take advantage of the sorting - the "!"
(exclamation point) character sorts ahead of "A" and would be the
first file in the directory list." considered "test / vandalism"?
I mounted and read
DECUS tapes on PDP-11s at NASA/JPL in Pasadena.
The DECUS software (like the compilers) was frequently better than the DEC stuff.
The DOC suffix indicated "DOCumentation" in the 1970s, long before
the IBM PC was introduced in 1981. Word didn't show up until 1983.
Yes, Microsoft hijacked the DOC suffix. They could have used WRD for Word.
If you want to use a less inflammatory term that "hijacked", go ahead.
Wikipedia is supposed to be an online encyclopedia. An encyclopedia
has history in it. I added history:
- "The first time this contributor saw a "readme" file was on a
- Digital Equipment Computer Users' Society
DECUS free software
- magnetic tape around 1970 or 71. It was a single file on the
- beginning of the tape, containing notes about the tape itself,
- a list of contributors and their contact information, and
- then several paragraphs documenting each contributed file.
−
− Anybody have any older history?
How is adding something that is a part of Wikipedia considered vandalism - especially
when I'm ASKING for additional knowledgeable contributions to an article? Us
old farts are dying off and our knowledge and history is dying with us.
You reverted my contribution. Fine. Let's go through my contribution,
item by item, and see what parts you have issues with. Let's resolve
this.
Post your response here and I'll check this page tonight (Sunday) or tomorrow.
173.51.10.223 (
talk)
18:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
I respect the fact that you're a human being and have been there and done that. In fact, there's a good likelihood that you know computers substantially better than I do. However, I am going to have to insist that you cite your sources, do not use loaded words against corporations without evidence that their actions fit the definition of "hijacking," and meets the manual of style. Had the edit been such that I could have fixed it, I would have. However, not one of your additions was sourced. I urge you to consider my comment on your talk page rather than the edit summary, which is meant to be an explanation of what I did (and it did accurately - I reverted an edit that I identified as vandalism). Your edit was unconstructive. It did not improve the encyclopedia. At the time of my initial reading, it appeared as though there was both vandalism ("hijack") and testing (asking the question). In hindsight, perhaps I should have assumed good faith, but I stand by my analysis of your edit.
If you can add citations, references, use proper formatting, and use the talk page, I'll be happy to permit your edits. Please feel free to ask me in the future if you have any questions about policy, which I consider myself relatively well-versed in. I do ask that, on my talk page, you do not page break with every sentence, though, simply for the sake of aesthetics. If you find issue with my response, you may seek dispute resolution. -- Jackson Peebles ( talk) 19:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Jackson Peebles. Saw your pledge at the Typo Team. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. See you around! Cheers, Jason
AutomaticStrikeout
? is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Auto-Archive Requested: Jackson Peebles ( talk) 07:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Auto-Archive Requested: Jackson Peebles ( talk) 07:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I only will edit Lukaku not play for Pelister, its fake. He play for Chelsea. SSorry for bad enghlish.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kosovo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey there, Jackson. Thanks for the feedback. You guessed correctly; both of these articles are works in progress! Recently, I've been working hard on topics related to the history of the Virginia General Assembly, and I appreciate your words of praise as well as your suggestions. I added some refs to Saunders, but I'm gonna hold off a bit before putting inline citations in the other one, as there's still some more things I want to add. Definitely on my to-do list. Cheers. Rockhead126 ( talk) 07:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)