|
Hey, thanks for the introduction. Was there anything in particular you thought I needed to take a look at?
JacDT ( talk) 04:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Much appreciated
JacDT ( talk) 05:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frank Asaro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm not going to leave you a formal warning here, but you are barking up the wrong tree. V is policy. BLP is policy RS is a guideline subsidiary to policy. I have no idea of why you are doing accusing me of bad faith, but your accusations are out of line. I came upon this article a few days ago, and found a promotional Facebook style page, which i quite properly stubbed (I've stubbed hundreds of similar articles.) I've got near 100,000 edits, most to school articles and my work has been recognized by dozens of editors, including being named Editor of the Week primarily for my work on school articles. If you wish to discuss this dispassionately, start a thread on the article talk page. But please read WP:BURDEN, and you cannot form a consensus in violation of policy. John from Idegon ( talk) 05:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I noticed on the talk page of the JFK High School article you noted you are one of its notable alumni-- that is a WP:COI that you need to declare. I have also mentioned it on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools talk page. Please read the policy and declare your COI here. Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 01:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Good newss: I've found reliable sources for both these bios that mentionn they're alumni of JFK High, but the Oda sources so far do nt provide substantial coverage, only passing mentions. I did add what I found to the Oda draft, but so far it's not enough sourcing for a bio on Wikipedia. I also changed the url on the NYT article about Judy Tyrus-- I remembered that there's an option for subscribers to share an article, which now apparently points to an archived version rather than the one behind the paywall. Still, the text is available. Then I did another NYT serch on Tyrus and turned up 40+ articles, some of which appear substantial enough to use. There are also several hundred hits on the newspapers.com search of her name which I haven't begun to screen. So when you have time, there will be some potential sources available. I'll keep looking for more on each subject. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 07:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)₧
Hi again, JacDT. I noticed you are using the Chicago Manual of Style, normally a good choice, but on WP, we have WP:MOS that sometimes differs markedly from the CMS. The location of punctuation relative to quotation marks is one such instance, reflecting a negotiated compromise that is mystifyingly referred to as " logical quotes." The issue leading to this formatting: British editors and most other English-speaking editors, unlike American editors, usually place commas and periods outside quotation marks! (I know, it just looks wrong to those of us who have been taght otherwise!) Anyhow, here's another tip: we have a cabal of wikignomes who (upon request) will copyedit an article once it is relatively stable. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. Et voilà, copyediting is manageable. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 21:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John F. Kennedy High School (Richmond, California), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi JacDT! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, The archival was done by
Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
No problem! Some other editors came by to take a look. We submitted the article and it's live now. JacDT ( talk) 22:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Hey, thanks for the introduction. Was there anything in particular you thought I needed to take a look at?
JacDT ( talk) 04:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Much appreciated
JacDT ( talk) 05:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frank Asaro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm not going to leave you a formal warning here, but you are barking up the wrong tree. V is policy. BLP is policy RS is a guideline subsidiary to policy. I have no idea of why you are doing accusing me of bad faith, but your accusations are out of line. I came upon this article a few days ago, and found a promotional Facebook style page, which i quite properly stubbed (I've stubbed hundreds of similar articles.) I've got near 100,000 edits, most to school articles and my work has been recognized by dozens of editors, including being named Editor of the Week primarily for my work on school articles. If you wish to discuss this dispassionately, start a thread on the article talk page. But please read WP:BURDEN, and you cannot form a consensus in violation of policy. John from Idegon ( talk) 05:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I noticed on the talk page of the JFK High School article you noted you are one of its notable alumni-- that is a WP:COI that you need to declare. I have also mentioned it on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools talk page. Please read the policy and declare your COI here. Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 01:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Good newss: I've found reliable sources for both these bios that mentionn they're alumni of JFK High, but the Oda sources so far do nt provide substantial coverage, only passing mentions. I did add what I found to the Oda draft, but so far it's not enough sourcing for a bio on Wikipedia. I also changed the url on the NYT article about Judy Tyrus-- I remembered that there's an option for subscribers to share an article, which now apparently points to an archived version rather than the one behind the paywall. Still, the text is available. Then I did another NYT serch on Tyrus and turned up 40+ articles, some of which appear substantial enough to use. There are also several hundred hits on the newspapers.com search of her name which I haven't begun to screen. So when you have time, there will be some potential sources available. I'll keep looking for more on each subject. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 07:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)₧
Hi again, JacDT. I noticed you are using the Chicago Manual of Style, normally a good choice, but on WP, we have WP:MOS that sometimes differs markedly from the CMS. The location of punctuation relative to quotation marks is one such instance, reflecting a negotiated compromise that is mystifyingly referred to as " logical quotes." The issue leading to this formatting: British editors and most other English-speaking editors, unlike American editors, usually place commas and periods outside quotation marks! (I know, it just looks wrong to those of us who have been taght otherwise!) Anyhow, here's another tip: we have a cabal of wikignomes who (upon request) will copyedit an article once it is relatively stable. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. Et voilà, copyediting is manageable. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 21:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John F. Kennedy High School (Richmond, California), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi JacDT! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, The archival was done by
Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
No problem! Some other editors came by to take a look. We submitted the article and it's live now. JacDT ( talk) 22:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)