november 2006 | | archives |
this is a
talk page archive, messages left here will not be replied to
put a new message on
User talk:J Di
please do not remove or revert messages that appear to be vandalism
Hey, thanks for that! Budgiekiller 13:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
somebody just vandal'd my talk... for giving myself a barnstar... the user is Whirling Sands Offensiveandconfusing 21:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Well done on passing your RfA with flying colours! If you have any questions about being an admin then please don't hesititate to ask and I will do my best to answer. Regards and happy editing, (aeropagitica) 17:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations, in spite of my 'neutral' vote I do wish you all the best as one of our newest admins :) Kind regards, -- Joanne B 15:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. IrishGuy talk 18:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
I can confirm that I use the nicks J_Di and JD_UK on IRC. JD talk 23:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
You are more patient than I; I'd have nuked the user for this edit alone. :) RadioKirk ( u| t| c) 02:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I tried moving the page but could not since since female genital mutilation already exists.As you are an admin , I will then ask you-- CltFn 12:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the edits to my user page. Regards, Mr Stephen 15:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
That's fine with me, now remove our club badge from that nonsensicle article please.
I mean that the current Millwall F.C. badge is on the page of an article called: Millwall Brick, this article has no basis in truth, it emanates from a spoof Viz Comic Advertisment. This "article" is defamatory, and should be removed forthwith. Best wishes, Lion King 17:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks much for quick action on vandal! Zora 18:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
As for Jack Ash, I wasn't sure if his username should be blocked or not - that's why I put the question marks there. I figured it's up to you. The reason it is likely inappropriate is that it is a rip off of the term jack ass. - Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to point out: Ghostbusters is a film. The reverts you are doing are to AIDS. I've checked the talk page for Ghostbusters, and it's for the film. So whoever made it into an AIDS article, was the one that started this mess. RobJ1981 21:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind fixing the article, I was about to clean this up until you mucked around with it-- Jack Cox 21:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
You had much success banning me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.206.199.241 ( talk • contribs) 21:51, November 5, 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for blocking 67.121.240.231, but I'm confused about something. The block log shows you blocking them at 04:02, 06 November 2006 for a period of 48 hours. Twelve minutes later, at 04:14 they edited their own talk page. I don't see any unblock. Is there a delay I'm unaware of as to when the block takes effect? SWAdair 10:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Psst... BTW: Paul Signac's page is vandalized. Notice the master love-maker, the Borg, and lots and lots of Nazis. Revert it to about 3 edits back? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.164.161.65 ( talk • contribs) 11:46, November 6, 2006 (UTC)
See
WP:RFPP. Wikipedia policy says,"On the day's Featured Article, which should almost never be protected, in the interests of encouraging newcomers to be bold. Other pages linked from the Main Page may be protected if under attack." Just thought I'd let the newbie know.
Nishkid
64
22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Please before reverting valid edits refer to the talk page for an explanation. I cannot revert this edit as I am not sure whether I will be blocked, however I would apprciate greatly that you consider the discussion I started at Talk:Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Thankyou. SauliH 19:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Three-revert rule#Detail:
This policy does not apply to self-reverts, correcting simple vandalism, reverting the edits of a banned or blocked user, or other specific scenarios listed in the Exceptions section below.
Just thought you might want some reassurance. JD talk 19:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, yeah that's cool, thanks for noticing! Since I got VandalProof up and running I seem to have upset an large number of anonymous IPs! Hopefully means I'm doing something right!! Budgiekiller 08:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits, I have seen the episode before, and i know that he was hyper on Red Lemonade, please see Neighbours Fansite.
Suicidal tendancies 12:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
he became unconcious from drinking alcohol at rachel's birthday party, not at the sleep over, he became hyperactive from drinking red lemonade. Suicidal tendancies 18:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I strongly suggest you split every character from Home and Away into their own article and organize to page so it is understandable. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I would like to see evert article like Jack Holden on past or present characters. You have done a super job on them Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 18:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
You blocked 206.180.101.19 indefinitely not long ago. I can understand that there's a lot of vandalism from that IP, but I thought that IPs weren't meant to be indefinitely blocked unless they are open proxies. Is there a problem with placing a definite long term block on the IP? JD talk 19:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
You're absolutely right. Consider it overkill on my part, I stand corrected. I will fix it, or ask for help if necessary. Thanks for the note. Kaisershatner 19:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Just had a min to read the fine print at WP:BLOCK, note "# Vandalism — Blocks should not be used against isolated incidents of vandalism. Dynamic IPs: up to 24 hours. AOL IPs and range blocks: about 15 minutes, then 1-3 hours, and 24 at most, to avoid collateral damage. Static IPs and logged-in users: start at 24 hours, increase gradually if it starts again; persistent violators may be blocked indefinitely, but use discretion." I think at least one if not both of the ips I blocked indefinitely met that criteria, certainly the one that was six months of nothing but vandalism. Cheers! Kaisershatner 02:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Because I can't provide differences in a speedy tag, here is the edit where the original uploader edited at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Image%3AJohnny_Pacheco.jpg&diff=86813834&oldid=86813198 and wrote "Please delete ASAP" -- moe. RON Let's talk | done 02:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
||
Glen is thrilled to award his good mate J Di with this small token of appreciation and acknowledgement for exceptional performance in reorganzing and tiding our Request for adminship space... YOU are a legend my friend! Glen 11:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
I need a friend Eet Shiit 00:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm using my neighbor's computer because mine is blocked. You blocked my account due to the username, but the username is my real name. This is all a big misunderstanding. Please unblock me. -- 216.164.199.84 00:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Oops, sorry 'bout messin' up your sig at the HD. Feel free to cut this post at will. -- hydnjo talk 01:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello, you used the {{
helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp
IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the
web-based client to get instant access.) How ironic. -
Royalguard11(
Talk·
Desk·
Review Me!)
02:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you've added {{ no rationale}} to Image:Thisgroovecover.jpg, but it was uploaded before 2006-05-04, not after it. -- Kjoon lee 05:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not revert edits to Kentucky Fried Chicken or KFC again because you don't know what you are doing. The company has changed its name. 166.82.206.146 18:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello I have just edited the Sunderland page, as I looked at A TABLE on the BBC sports news and I updated the article, and WHAT DO YOU DO? Revert it MR. Thinks he's clever, change it back please. Professor Sunderland 18:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) at 18:18pm on the 12th November 2006
thanks for the lift on the Ip ban ;). Thatperson
Thanks so much for reverting vandalism on my page!!!!! It's the first time it has occurred on my page. RaNdOm26 02:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
You reverted a notice I made of copyright infringement. Please read my discussion of such, and go to the reference I listed. You will see the whole thing is plagiarized.
Thanx, mwinog2777
Hi, thanks for your comment. But I use to put test templates and I am not sure what did you mean in your message. Can you please be a bit indetail. thanks codetiger 14:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
You removed [2] my RFA (it has been restored), was there a reason why? If it's because of my edit summary, I apologize, I made a typo and forgot an "S" in there so that's why it appears as a redlink in the log. Metros232 17:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Sigh. RockerAndRoller etc caught my eye on NP patrol and I was just about to revert the vandalism to your userpage when you beat me to it. I sometimes wonder what's stuffed in peoples' heads. For a start if I was idiot enough to vandalise a userpage I wouldn't choose one clearly stating that the user was an admin, then once it was obvious my edits were being watched I very probably wouldn't go on and do yet another puerile edit. Takes all sorts, I suppose :-( Cheers, Tonywalton | Talk 18:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Why did you revert the fake user page made similar to my name? It was obviously setup by a vandal - in this case User:Boris Allen. Aren't you going to delete it and ban the guy? John Smith's 18:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi.. you reverted this user's vandalism earlier, but the same IP has returned with a partial blanking. Rather that reverting it myself, I thought I'd leave it to you to see if you wanted to issue a block to the IP as well. -- Rrburke 21:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi.. Um, I think the semi-protection should be there because I discovered a variety of vandalisms when I last went on. Thanx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaggy9872004 ( talk • contribs) 11:51, November 14, 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to know why you moved User:John Smith's to User:John Smith's Willy and User talk:John Smith's to User talk:John Smith's Willy on November 7 2006. These page moves appear to be vandalism. I have moved the pages back and merged the page histories, but unless there is a good reason for why you did this, consider this a warning. If you do this again, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia to prevent further non-constructive page moves. JD talk 19:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove reports from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, even if the reported user has stopped vandalising. Administrators trying to work through the reports can be confused if reports suddenly start disappearing, and this could allow users that should have been blocked to continue editing later. You edit conflicted me when you made this edit, and that slowed me down as I didn't know what I was doing after encountering a second edit conflict. I appreciate you wanting to help with the backlogs, but AIV probably isn't the best place to try. JD talk 17:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Please consider unprotecting Something Awful. Misza13 did a range block on the most recent vandal for me, so I don't think the protection is needed. Thanks. JD talk 17:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() The mop |
Congratulations on becoming an admin!
Enjoy your new-found powers, and remember to use them only for good, and not for evil. If you would like to try out your new mop, here are some spots that always need loving care:
All the best! - Quadell |
![]() The flamethrower |
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 21:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to know why you removed the merge tags from Damien Leith and Dean Geyer. If another editor has added merge tags to articles and proposed a merge in good faith, you shouldn't remove the merge tags. I knew what I was doing when I added those merge tags, and meant to add one to every article I have added one to. If you are opposed to the proposed merge, please discuss it by clicking on the Discuss link on the merge tags; they will all take you to Talk:Australian Idol 2006. Don't remove these merge tags again until a decision has been reached. Removing them prematurely may leave people unaware that the merge has been proposed, and this may affect how the discussion develops. Thank you. JD talk 22:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
In response to these two edits on User talk:Phil Boswell, please do not threaten to block editors to elicit a response from them. Blocks are meant only to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and I do not see anything done by Phil Boswell that is deserving of a block. Please read Wikipedia's policy on blocking editors before you "consider" any more. JD talk 17:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Hi J di, In response to these two edits on User talk:Phil Boswell, please do not threaten to block editors to elicit a response. Blocks are meant only to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and I do not see anything done by Phil Boswell that is deserving of a block... Unfortunately I feel disruption is underway, as the code Phil is/was subst:ing is not optimiz/sed for subst:ing; cf {{ ·}}'s history.
Meanwhile, I'm perturbed that Phil appears not only to've ignored my attempt to discuss the matter and then my request to stop and do so, but continue editing as if no contact made. Does this perturb you? Regards, David Kernow ( talk) 17:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
·
..." on Phil's talk page. Using in this way prevents the separator character (whether a middot, bullet, etc) from appearing at the start of a wrapped line, i.e. it assists in formatting the template appearance.{{·}}
after an item rather than ·
or ·
or <small>•</small>
or <span style="font-size:80%;">•</span>
etc desirable as:
Thanks. I was handling a persistent IP vandal so I couldn't respond earlier. Gdo01 17:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
What more do you want????? I had the thread where the creation of a ClutchFans article was discussed linked to the images. I then have the EXACT post where the owner of the sight praises the work. Now I have added both links. What more is needed???? ( Lil Pun 20:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC))
In more formal prose, all numbers under 100 are written out in words. In the manual of style, we compromised on wording that numbers that can be written out as two words or less "may" be written out. See [3]. You may notice, for example, that in the most formal prose such as in wedding invitations or legal text, numbers are always written out fully, regardless of how long it is. — Centrx→ talk • 02:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Geez mate, there is no need to yell like an old bludger. The only reason I have put that up there is because I've contacted the administrators because of some of the vandalism that has been happening on the page. See for yourself. It was also a way to scare away some of the vandals so next time you decide to be rude to someone, think clearly of the possibilites those editors are trying to do. Good Day to you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaggy9872004 ( talk • contribs) 06:11, November 17, 2006 (UTC)
Hi, How are you mate? This is concerning 'The Wedge (TV Show) CAn you please stop re-eneterin '...and Criticsm' into the name. It's not very appropriate for the article. One word is enough to make this a neutral article. Thanks! — shaggy9872004 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaggy9872004 ( talk • contribs) 10:04, November 18, 2006 (UTC)
PLease stop the edit war on the section headings and discuss the matter on the talk page. You have also reached the WP:3RR limit and could be blocked for 24hours. Gnangarra
I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, J di, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions (such as yourself)! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, M a rtinp23 14:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hi! I would be interested to know your reasons for reverting my edit to this article. IE: why you changed my reversing of the recent changing of Camerons name to the American style of using his surname rather than his first name, as it was since the article was first started? Richard Harvey 19:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
In regards to this edit summary left on an edit made to The Wedge (TV show): Yes, it doesn't have written source but Kate Jenkinson has said that they would start filming in September, where exactly did she say this? Would I be able to listen to her saying it? JD talk 09:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
J Di: the redirect to Heat pump is intentional and after discussion/comment period. Please turn off your (automatic?) undos. 129.237.114.171 18:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
You recently protected User:FisherQueen because of repeated new user vandalism, but, as is common with some of our best vandal fighters, FisherQueen enjoys the puerile defacement of her page. (I know I do! 55 vandalism edits and counting.) Per her request, I've unprotected the page. I don't think this counts as wheel-warring (god I hope not) but I thought I should let you know. -- Merope 19:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Concerning Image:Scream (1996 film) poster.jpg, please read speedy deletion guidelines again. Especially I6. Best, feydey 20:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
Cheers! : ) — Rand fan ! ! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
I'm currently undergoing an Editor review, and am trying to get a large amount of replies. I am sending messages to those who left me a message on my talk page as a way of getting the word out. I encourage you to add your two cents to the review! Thanks for your time, and Happy Thanksgiving! FireSpik e Editor Review! 20:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:SpiderManLenticular.gif is a fair use image; it can't go on your user page. JD talk 21:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi J Di, may I ask what you are doing with the page? Thanks Shaggy9872004 10:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
why shouldnt it be on wikipedia. bands that have done less and are currently defunct are on wikipedia. there is no reason to delete karate high school. they are a band, on a lable, that has published material and is touring. JoshDinger 20:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Seriously!. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SamFan64 ( talk • contribs) 21:11, November 24, 2006 (UTC)
Why did you say this page did not exist? I wrote it, and i'd know! Eli Tuberg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.243.43.253 ( talk • contribs) 22:38, November 24, 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. Michaelbusch 22:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing my user page, much appreciated. Canadian-Bacon t c 23:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting up those untrue stupiditys made by likely the same person under diffrent IP addresses. I've put my talk page under request for semi-protection due to concerns of harrassment here. I'm also concern this could be the same person then User:64.235.216.166 who've vandalized my user page earlier this week.-- JForget 23:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you trying to do?... with the T.S.O.L. image?? It was taken from an event poster, which is a form of promotional image, thus fair use. - Deathrocker 11:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
There is a new account: publishing created for editing the PHPCow article as phpcow.com user was marked as spam.
Please edit the page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHPCow and make appropriate changes to remove the comment box —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Publishing ( talk • contribs) 17:21, November 25, 2006 (UTC)
You're fast! (and I screwed up the template on AIV the first time(s)) ;) Dina 18:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I do not undertand why this article was deleted. It is like many other articles about 501 (c) (3) organizations in Wikipedia - it allows individuals trying to understand the international advocacy and disease support world to find support.
Comperable articles that are in Wikipedia are: March of Dimes American Cancer Society
and so on - why has this one been deleted? Sfterry 20:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
You keep telling me my TV screenshots do not have a "fair use rational", but the information I put on the image page is exactly the same as the information I find on other TV screenshots (eg. source, template, description). What exactly does a "fair use rational" look like? Kogsquinge 23:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
...for rvv on my user page. amitch 01:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
LOL U GUYS R RETARDS!!!!! BY JOHN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maddypenguin ( talk • contribs) 09:49, November 27, 2006 (UTC)
So that sort of thing qualifies as a speedy? I thought it might, but I just wanted to be sure. Thanks :) riana_ dzasta 12:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Oooops, I already have a user page but forgot to sign in! Im useually User:Mostly Zen Thanks - 80.195.196.38 14:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Just a quick thnaks for bringing this to my attention. I guess I forgot to put in the source. Thanks for letting me know -- Whats new? / Talk 11:52, 28 November 2006. ( AEDT)
Could you please revert MY edit in that page?.
Y reverted an obvious case of vandalism, but I forgot I am currently operating from a "filtered" Internet access, that truncated some words.
Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. Randroide 15:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For reverting my userpage after it was vandalized. FireSpik e Editor Review! 02:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
May I ask: 'Why you put that AfD on the page?'. The page has nothing wrong with it, I don't see you putting it on other idol's pages. Shaggy9872004 09:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
No, it's driven off the dates of the database dumps - and hence is not 100% accurate. See Template_talk:Unreferenced#This_should_be_a_deletion_template for more discussion. Rich Farmbrough, 09:29 29 November 2006 (GMT).
J Di, can u please block this IP, it has attacked 'The Wedge' Countless times already, 203.101.232.240 Shaggy9872004 09:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
No personal attacks
With regards to your comments on Talk:Australian Idol: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. JDtalk 09:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. JDtalk 11:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
--In response to your vandalism on my user page, I only made 2 messages that were even close to a personal attack. And they were both posted at least 3-4 days before your 'first' warning that you put all over my profile page. You can'[t give someone 2 warnings in a row for one thing, and then say the first one was the first and the second one was the last. Keep a lid on your temper.What do you mean its my last warning, guh... I'd say you're a bit full of yourself mate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilverNightFire ( talk • contribs) 10:44, November 29, 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Normandy ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Your recently blocked TheBigBadWolf for personal comments he made on my user page for which I am thankful. However, someone called TheBiggerBadWolf has now written "No you didn't faggy. Ha. You can't stop me! Viltry the Sock Puppeteer continues his work! pwned J Di, pwned. And you can block this account =] It won't stop me xD Have fun!". Is there anything you can do about it? Thanks. -- Random2502 16:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. I explained my initial revert as "Rv: The trailer page is already linked to, the newspaper info is irrelevant; The joke isn't that they will kill the people in the front row of the theater, it's that they don". The end is cut off because I accidentally saved the page before I was done typing. If in your caution at the top of this page you meant that you'd prefer I reply on my own talk page, I apologize. si»abhorreo» T 22:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
You can now disable the bit of javascript code I added by putting this in your monobook.js:
disableRealTitle = 1;
If there's a reason that this might be needed, and it's something reasonable others agree with, I'd be happy to tweak the code to address it. But as I said, once the title is changed to be lowercase, the {{ lowercase}} message seems to be redundant at that point. -- Interiot 23:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Shaggy9872004 09:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
november 2006 | | archives |
this is a
talk page archive, messages left here will not be replied to
put a new message on
User talk:J Di
please do not remove or revert messages that appear to be vandalism
Hey, thanks for that! Budgiekiller 13:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
somebody just vandal'd my talk... for giving myself a barnstar... the user is Whirling Sands Offensiveandconfusing 21:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Well done on passing your RfA with flying colours! If you have any questions about being an admin then please don't hesititate to ask and I will do my best to answer. Regards and happy editing, (aeropagitica) 17:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations, in spite of my 'neutral' vote I do wish you all the best as one of our newest admins :) Kind regards, -- Joanne B 15:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. IrishGuy talk 18:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
I can confirm that I use the nicks J_Di and JD_UK on IRC. JD talk 23:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
You are more patient than I; I'd have nuked the user for this edit alone. :) RadioKirk ( u| t| c) 02:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I tried moving the page but could not since since female genital mutilation already exists.As you are an admin , I will then ask you-- CltFn 12:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the edits to my user page. Regards, Mr Stephen 15:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
That's fine with me, now remove our club badge from that nonsensicle article please.
I mean that the current Millwall F.C. badge is on the page of an article called: Millwall Brick, this article has no basis in truth, it emanates from a spoof Viz Comic Advertisment. This "article" is defamatory, and should be removed forthwith. Best wishes, Lion King 17:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks much for quick action on vandal! Zora 18:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
As for Jack Ash, I wasn't sure if his username should be blocked or not - that's why I put the question marks there. I figured it's up to you. The reason it is likely inappropriate is that it is a rip off of the term jack ass. - Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to point out: Ghostbusters is a film. The reverts you are doing are to AIDS. I've checked the talk page for Ghostbusters, and it's for the film. So whoever made it into an AIDS article, was the one that started this mess. RobJ1981 21:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind fixing the article, I was about to clean this up until you mucked around with it-- Jack Cox 21:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
You had much success banning me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.206.199.241 ( talk • contribs) 21:51, November 5, 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for blocking 67.121.240.231, but I'm confused about something. The block log shows you blocking them at 04:02, 06 November 2006 for a period of 48 hours. Twelve minutes later, at 04:14 they edited their own talk page. I don't see any unblock. Is there a delay I'm unaware of as to when the block takes effect? SWAdair 10:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Psst... BTW: Paul Signac's page is vandalized. Notice the master love-maker, the Borg, and lots and lots of Nazis. Revert it to about 3 edits back? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.164.161.65 ( talk • contribs) 11:46, November 6, 2006 (UTC)
See
WP:RFPP. Wikipedia policy says,"On the day's Featured Article, which should almost never be protected, in the interests of encouraging newcomers to be bold. Other pages linked from the Main Page may be protected if under attack." Just thought I'd let the newbie know.
Nishkid
64
22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Please before reverting valid edits refer to the talk page for an explanation. I cannot revert this edit as I am not sure whether I will be blocked, however I would apprciate greatly that you consider the discussion I started at Talk:Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Thankyou. SauliH 19:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Three-revert rule#Detail:
This policy does not apply to self-reverts, correcting simple vandalism, reverting the edits of a banned or blocked user, or other specific scenarios listed in the Exceptions section below.
Just thought you might want some reassurance. JD talk 19:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, yeah that's cool, thanks for noticing! Since I got VandalProof up and running I seem to have upset an large number of anonymous IPs! Hopefully means I'm doing something right!! Budgiekiller 08:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits, I have seen the episode before, and i know that he was hyper on Red Lemonade, please see Neighbours Fansite.
Suicidal tendancies 12:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
he became unconcious from drinking alcohol at rachel's birthday party, not at the sleep over, he became hyperactive from drinking red lemonade. Suicidal tendancies 18:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I strongly suggest you split every character from Home and Away into their own article and organize to page so it is understandable. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I would like to see evert article like Jack Holden on past or present characters. You have done a super job on them Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 18:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
You blocked 206.180.101.19 indefinitely not long ago. I can understand that there's a lot of vandalism from that IP, but I thought that IPs weren't meant to be indefinitely blocked unless they are open proxies. Is there a problem with placing a definite long term block on the IP? JD talk 19:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
You're absolutely right. Consider it overkill on my part, I stand corrected. I will fix it, or ask for help if necessary. Thanks for the note. Kaisershatner 19:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Just had a min to read the fine print at WP:BLOCK, note "# Vandalism — Blocks should not be used against isolated incidents of vandalism. Dynamic IPs: up to 24 hours. AOL IPs and range blocks: about 15 minutes, then 1-3 hours, and 24 at most, to avoid collateral damage. Static IPs and logged-in users: start at 24 hours, increase gradually if it starts again; persistent violators may be blocked indefinitely, but use discretion." I think at least one if not both of the ips I blocked indefinitely met that criteria, certainly the one that was six months of nothing but vandalism. Cheers! Kaisershatner 02:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Because I can't provide differences in a speedy tag, here is the edit where the original uploader edited at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Image%3AJohnny_Pacheco.jpg&diff=86813834&oldid=86813198 and wrote "Please delete ASAP" -- moe. RON Let's talk | done 02:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
||
Glen is thrilled to award his good mate J Di with this small token of appreciation and acknowledgement for exceptional performance in reorganzing and tiding our Request for adminship space... YOU are a legend my friend! Glen 11:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
I need a friend Eet Shiit 00:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm using my neighbor's computer because mine is blocked. You blocked my account due to the username, but the username is my real name. This is all a big misunderstanding. Please unblock me. -- 216.164.199.84 00:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Oops, sorry 'bout messin' up your sig at the HD. Feel free to cut this post at will. -- hydnjo talk 01:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello, you used the {{
helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp
IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the
web-based client to get instant access.) How ironic. -
Royalguard11(
Talk·
Desk·
Review Me!)
02:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you've added {{ no rationale}} to Image:Thisgroovecover.jpg, but it was uploaded before 2006-05-04, not after it. -- Kjoon lee 05:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not revert edits to Kentucky Fried Chicken or KFC again because you don't know what you are doing. The company has changed its name. 166.82.206.146 18:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello I have just edited the Sunderland page, as I looked at A TABLE on the BBC sports news and I updated the article, and WHAT DO YOU DO? Revert it MR. Thinks he's clever, change it back please. Professor Sunderland 18:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) at 18:18pm on the 12th November 2006
thanks for the lift on the Ip ban ;). Thatperson
Thanks so much for reverting vandalism on my page!!!!! It's the first time it has occurred on my page. RaNdOm26 02:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
You reverted a notice I made of copyright infringement. Please read my discussion of such, and go to the reference I listed. You will see the whole thing is plagiarized.
Thanx, mwinog2777
Hi, thanks for your comment. But I use to put test templates and I am not sure what did you mean in your message. Can you please be a bit indetail. thanks codetiger 14:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
You removed [2] my RFA (it has been restored), was there a reason why? If it's because of my edit summary, I apologize, I made a typo and forgot an "S" in there so that's why it appears as a redlink in the log. Metros232 17:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Sigh. RockerAndRoller etc caught my eye on NP patrol and I was just about to revert the vandalism to your userpage when you beat me to it. I sometimes wonder what's stuffed in peoples' heads. For a start if I was idiot enough to vandalise a userpage I wouldn't choose one clearly stating that the user was an admin, then once it was obvious my edits were being watched I very probably wouldn't go on and do yet another puerile edit. Takes all sorts, I suppose :-( Cheers, Tonywalton | Talk 18:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Why did you revert the fake user page made similar to my name? It was obviously setup by a vandal - in this case User:Boris Allen. Aren't you going to delete it and ban the guy? John Smith's 18:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi.. you reverted this user's vandalism earlier, but the same IP has returned with a partial blanking. Rather that reverting it myself, I thought I'd leave it to you to see if you wanted to issue a block to the IP as well. -- Rrburke 21:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi.. Um, I think the semi-protection should be there because I discovered a variety of vandalisms when I last went on. Thanx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaggy9872004 ( talk • contribs) 11:51, November 14, 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to know why you moved User:John Smith's to User:John Smith's Willy and User talk:John Smith's to User talk:John Smith's Willy on November 7 2006. These page moves appear to be vandalism. I have moved the pages back and merged the page histories, but unless there is a good reason for why you did this, consider this a warning. If you do this again, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia to prevent further non-constructive page moves. JD talk 19:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove reports from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, even if the reported user has stopped vandalising. Administrators trying to work through the reports can be confused if reports suddenly start disappearing, and this could allow users that should have been blocked to continue editing later. You edit conflicted me when you made this edit, and that slowed me down as I didn't know what I was doing after encountering a second edit conflict. I appreciate you wanting to help with the backlogs, but AIV probably isn't the best place to try. JD talk 17:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Please consider unprotecting Something Awful. Misza13 did a range block on the most recent vandal for me, so I don't think the protection is needed. Thanks. JD talk 17:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() The mop |
Congratulations on becoming an admin!
Enjoy your new-found powers, and remember to use them only for good, and not for evil. If you would like to try out your new mop, here are some spots that always need loving care:
All the best! - Quadell |
![]() The flamethrower |
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 21:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to know why you removed the merge tags from Damien Leith and Dean Geyer. If another editor has added merge tags to articles and proposed a merge in good faith, you shouldn't remove the merge tags. I knew what I was doing when I added those merge tags, and meant to add one to every article I have added one to. If you are opposed to the proposed merge, please discuss it by clicking on the Discuss link on the merge tags; they will all take you to Talk:Australian Idol 2006. Don't remove these merge tags again until a decision has been reached. Removing them prematurely may leave people unaware that the merge has been proposed, and this may affect how the discussion develops. Thank you. JD talk 22:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
In response to these two edits on User talk:Phil Boswell, please do not threaten to block editors to elicit a response from them. Blocks are meant only to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and I do not see anything done by Phil Boswell that is deserving of a block. Please read Wikipedia's policy on blocking editors before you "consider" any more. JD talk 17:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Hi J di, In response to these two edits on User talk:Phil Boswell, please do not threaten to block editors to elicit a response. Blocks are meant only to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and I do not see anything done by Phil Boswell that is deserving of a block... Unfortunately I feel disruption is underway, as the code Phil is/was subst:ing is not optimiz/sed for subst:ing; cf {{ ·}}'s history.
Meanwhile, I'm perturbed that Phil appears not only to've ignored my attempt to discuss the matter and then my request to stop and do so, but continue editing as if no contact made. Does this perturb you? Regards, David Kernow ( talk) 17:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
·
..." on Phil's talk page. Using in this way prevents the separator character (whether a middot, bullet, etc) from appearing at the start of a wrapped line, i.e. it assists in formatting the template appearance.{{·}}
after an item rather than ·
or ·
or <small>•</small>
or <span style="font-size:80%;">•</span>
etc desirable as:
Thanks. I was handling a persistent IP vandal so I couldn't respond earlier. Gdo01 17:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
What more do you want????? I had the thread where the creation of a ClutchFans article was discussed linked to the images. I then have the EXACT post where the owner of the sight praises the work. Now I have added both links. What more is needed???? ( Lil Pun 20:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC))
In more formal prose, all numbers under 100 are written out in words. In the manual of style, we compromised on wording that numbers that can be written out as two words or less "may" be written out. See [3]. You may notice, for example, that in the most formal prose such as in wedding invitations or legal text, numbers are always written out fully, regardless of how long it is. — Centrx→ talk • 02:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Geez mate, there is no need to yell like an old bludger. The only reason I have put that up there is because I've contacted the administrators because of some of the vandalism that has been happening on the page. See for yourself. It was also a way to scare away some of the vandals so next time you decide to be rude to someone, think clearly of the possibilites those editors are trying to do. Good Day to you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaggy9872004 ( talk • contribs) 06:11, November 17, 2006 (UTC)
Hi, How are you mate? This is concerning 'The Wedge (TV Show) CAn you please stop re-eneterin '...and Criticsm' into the name. It's not very appropriate for the article. One word is enough to make this a neutral article. Thanks! — shaggy9872004 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shaggy9872004 ( talk • contribs) 10:04, November 18, 2006 (UTC)
PLease stop the edit war on the section headings and discuss the matter on the talk page. You have also reached the WP:3RR limit and could be blocked for 24hours. Gnangarra
I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, J di, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions (such as yourself)! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, M a rtinp23 14:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hi! I would be interested to know your reasons for reverting my edit to this article. IE: why you changed my reversing of the recent changing of Camerons name to the American style of using his surname rather than his first name, as it was since the article was first started? Richard Harvey 19:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
In regards to this edit summary left on an edit made to The Wedge (TV show): Yes, it doesn't have written source but Kate Jenkinson has said that they would start filming in September, where exactly did she say this? Would I be able to listen to her saying it? JD talk 09:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
J Di: the redirect to Heat pump is intentional and after discussion/comment period. Please turn off your (automatic?) undos. 129.237.114.171 18:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
You recently protected User:FisherQueen because of repeated new user vandalism, but, as is common with some of our best vandal fighters, FisherQueen enjoys the puerile defacement of her page. (I know I do! 55 vandalism edits and counting.) Per her request, I've unprotected the page. I don't think this counts as wheel-warring (god I hope not) but I thought I should let you know. -- Merope 19:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Concerning Image:Scream (1996 film) poster.jpg, please read speedy deletion guidelines again. Especially I6. Best, feydey 20:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
Cheers! : ) — Rand fan ! ! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
I'm currently undergoing an Editor review, and am trying to get a large amount of replies. I am sending messages to those who left me a message on my talk page as a way of getting the word out. I encourage you to add your two cents to the review! Thanks for your time, and Happy Thanksgiving! FireSpik e Editor Review! 20:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:SpiderManLenticular.gif is a fair use image; it can't go on your user page. JD talk 21:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi J Di, may I ask what you are doing with the page? Thanks Shaggy9872004 10:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
why shouldnt it be on wikipedia. bands that have done less and are currently defunct are on wikipedia. there is no reason to delete karate high school. they are a band, on a lable, that has published material and is touring. JoshDinger 20:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Seriously!. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SamFan64 ( talk • contribs) 21:11, November 24, 2006 (UTC)
Why did you say this page did not exist? I wrote it, and i'd know! Eli Tuberg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.243.43.253 ( talk • contribs) 22:38, November 24, 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. Michaelbusch 22:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing my user page, much appreciated. Canadian-Bacon t c 23:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting up those untrue stupiditys made by likely the same person under diffrent IP addresses. I've put my talk page under request for semi-protection due to concerns of harrassment here. I'm also concern this could be the same person then User:64.235.216.166 who've vandalized my user page earlier this week.-- JForget 23:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you trying to do?... with the T.S.O.L. image?? It was taken from an event poster, which is a form of promotional image, thus fair use. - Deathrocker 11:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
There is a new account: publishing created for editing the PHPCow article as phpcow.com user was marked as spam.
Please edit the page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHPCow and make appropriate changes to remove the comment box —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Publishing ( talk • contribs) 17:21, November 25, 2006 (UTC)
You're fast! (and I screwed up the template on AIV the first time(s)) ;) Dina 18:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I do not undertand why this article was deleted. It is like many other articles about 501 (c) (3) organizations in Wikipedia - it allows individuals trying to understand the international advocacy and disease support world to find support.
Comperable articles that are in Wikipedia are: March of Dimes American Cancer Society
and so on - why has this one been deleted? Sfterry 20:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
You keep telling me my TV screenshots do not have a "fair use rational", but the information I put on the image page is exactly the same as the information I find on other TV screenshots (eg. source, template, description). What exactly does a "fair use rational" look like? Kogsquinge 23:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
...for rvv on my user page. amitch 01:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
LOL U GUYS R RETARDS!!!!! BY JOHN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maddypenguin ( talk • contribs) 09:49, November 27, 2006 (UTC)
So that sort of thing qualifies as a speedy? I thought it might, but I just wanted to be sure. Thanks :) riana_ dzasta 12:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Oooops, I already have a user page but forgot to sign in! Im useually User:Mostly Zen Thanks - 80.195.196.38 14:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Just a quick thnaks for bringing this to my attention. I guess I forgot to put in the source. Thanks for letting me know -- Whats new? / Talk 11:52, 28 November 2006. ( AEDT)
Could you please revert MY edit in that page?.
Y reverted an obvious case of vandalism, but I forgot I am currently operating from a "filtered" Internet access, that truncated some words.
Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. Randroide 15:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For reverting my userpage after it was vandalized. FireSpik e Editor Review! 02:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
May I ask: 'Why you put that AfD on the page?'. The page has nothing wrong with it, I don't see you putting it on other idol's pages. Shaggy9872004 09:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
No, it's driven off the dates of the database dumps - and hence is not 100% accurate. See Template_talk:Unreferenced#This_should_be_a_deletion_template for more discussion. Rich Farmbrough, 09:29 29 November 2006 (GMT).
J Di, can u please block this IP, it has attacked 'The Wedge' Countless times already, 203.101.232.240 Shaggy9872004 09:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
No personal attacks
With regards to your comments on Talk:Australian Idol: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. JDtalk 09:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. JDtalk 11:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
--In response to your vandalism on my user page, I only made 2 messages that were even close to a personal attack. And they were both posted at least 3-4 days before your 'first' warning that you put all over my profile page. You can'[t give someone 2 warnings in a row for one thing, and then say the first one was the first and the second one was the last. Keep a lid on your temper.What do you mean its my last warning, guh... I'd say you're a bit full of yourself mate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilverNightFire ( talk • contribs) 10:44, November 29, 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Normandy ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Your recently blocked TheBigBadWolf for personal comments he made on my user page for which I am thankful. However, someone called TheBiggerBadWolf has now written "No you didn't faggy. Ha. You can't stop me! Viltry the Sock Puppeteer continues his work! pwned J Di, pwned. And you can block this account =] It won't stop me xD Have fun!". Is there anything you can do about it? Thanks. -- Random2502 16:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. I explained my initial revert as "Rv: The trailer page is already linked to, the newspaper info is irrelevant; The joke isn't that they will kill the people in the front row of the theater, it's that they don". The end is cut off because I accidentally saved the page before I was done typing. If in your caution at the top of this page you meant that you'd prefer I reply on my own talk page, I apologize. si»abhorreo» T 22:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
You can now disable the bit of javascript code I added by putting this in your monobook.js:
disableRealTitle = 1;
If there's a reason that this might be needed, and it's something reasonable others agree with, I'd be happy to tweak the code to address it. But as I said, once the title is changed to be lowercase, the {{ lowercase}} message seems to be redundant at that point. -- Interiot 23:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Shaggy9872004 09:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)