Welcome!
Hello, JPLogan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 05:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
[....](text removed) Voice of All Talk| @| Esperanza 17:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello non nlp promotional editors. Progress has been good as regards mediation and they will continue to improve as long as we all stay cool.
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 02:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming case. Raul654 01:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Would you add your wants for the article to be finished here In order to make sure everyone gets what they want I am just trying to keep track of it. jVirus 09:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi -- I have refactored a portion of your most recent remarks on NLP that I found needlessly baiting and antagonistic. Please think your comments over a little more carefully next time. · Katefan0 (scribble)/ poll 04:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
So you are saying we need to behave unlike most other wikipedia editors? JPLogan 01:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Using another editor's real name and otherwise casting aspersions as you have done this evening is inappropriate. You've already been warned against doing this very same thing. I am blocking you for 12 hours. The block lengths will grow geometrically from here. · Katefan0 (scribble)/ poll 06:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello Katefan0. I would like to know precisely how my edits involve casting aspersions. I am at a loss. I civilly offered Comaze a set of options in order to improve discussion. It is no secret that Comaze has a vested interest in promoting NLP. He has been open and honest with this fact, and with facts about his identity and affiliations from the beginning. I am using my own name, and I am also open and honest about this. If you wish to block me for being civil, open and honest, then again, I am at a loss. I would very much like some reassurance that my posts have been civil. I would truly like to know, are you interested in encouraging civility in discussion? So far, all the evidence points to you reducing civility and wishing to censor openness. JPLogan 06:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
You said, "You have claimed that NLP is not new age, but part of the human potential industry. Your assertion is inaccurate, as the human potential movement is part of the new age." - In fact I said that HeadleyDown made the claim that NLP is a member of both New Age movement and human potential movement. -- -=-C-=- 04:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Comaze. According to the literature, NLP is both New Age and of the Human Potential movement. JPLogan 10:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
This account and Medius maximus have been proven to be a sockpuppet of User:DaveRight and have therefore been blocked indefinitely. -- Woohookitty (cat scratches) 20:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, JPLogan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 05:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
[....](text removed) Voice of All Talk| @| Esperanza 17:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello non nlp promotional editors. Progress has been good as regards mediation and they will continue to improve as long as we all stay cool.
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 02:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming case. Raul654 01:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Would you add your wants for the article to be finished here In order to make sure everyone gets what they want I am just trying to keep track of it. jVirus 09:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi -- I have refactored a portion of your most recent remarks on NLP that I found needlessly baiting and antagonistic. Please think your comments over a little more carefully next time. · Katefan0 (scribble)/ poll 04:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
So you are saying we need to behave unlike most other wikipedia editors? JPLogan 01:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Using another editor's real name and otherwise casting aspersions as you have done this evening is inappropriate. You've already been warned against doing this very same thing. I am blocking you for 12 hours. The block lengths will grow geometrically from here. · Katefan0 (scribble)/ poll 06:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello Katefan0. I would like to know precisely how my edits involve casting aspersions. I am at a loss. I civilly offered Comaze a set of options in order to improve discussion. It is no secret that Comaze has a vested interest in promoting NLP. He has been open and honest with this fact, and with facts about his identity and affiliations from the beginning. I am using my own name, and I am also open and honest about this. If you wish to block me for being civil, open and honest, then again, I am at a loss. I would very much like some reassurance that my posts have been civil. I would truly like to know, are you interested in encouraging civility in discussion? So far, all the evidence points to you reducing civility and wishing to censor openness. JPLogan 06:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
You said, "You have claimed that NLP is not new age, but part of the human potential industry. Your assertion is inaccurate, as the human potential movement is part of the new age." - In fact I said that HeadleyDown made the claim that NLP is a member of both New Age movement and human potential movement. -- -=-C-=- 04:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Comaze. According to the literature, NLP is both New Age and of the Human Potential movement. JPLogan 10:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
This account and Medius maximus have been proven to be a sockpuppet of User:DaveRight and have therefore been blocked indefinitely. -- Woohookitty (cat scratches) 20:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)