Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 20:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — regards, Revi 12:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
LGBT propaganda. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please read
WP:POVFORK. Creating a version based on"alternative" points of view isnot consistent with Wikipedia policy.
bonadea
contributions
talk
11:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
In addition, none of the three sources you included supports the notion that "LGBT propaganda" exists. -- bonadea contributions talk 11:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Can you be more explicit? I provided sources and nothing was my point of view from there. And gay agenda and LGBT propaganda are 2 different things. What do these abuses mean? JOrb ( talk) 11:22, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Talk:Gay agenda for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
01:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 14:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Sir, i feel offended. There is literally no need for this. Hope this was only a misunderstanding. Thank you! JOrb ( talk) 16:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
User:Ymblanter (
talk)
22:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)JOrb ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What was the reason for being blocked again? I hope you do realize this is an abuse... What did I do? I complained for being insulted and what i get is being insulted by administrators and blocked without warning...--JOrb (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
At 11:21, 26 June 2021 you were informed that personal opinion does not belong on Wikipedia. At 14:24, 26 June 2021 you were informed that articles on the subject of "gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them" were under discretionary sanctions and that editors working in those areas were expected to "follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic". You relied that this "offended you".
You continued pushing your POV in multiple places on Wikipedia. You characterized a human rights struggle as propaganda in the article space even though you had been reverted and told it was not appropriate. You took the law in a specific jurisdiction and declared it to be some sort of universal truth. Frankly to quote another editor you seemed to be intentionally being offensive for the sake of being offensive.
I have zero confidence that you are here to write a neutrally toned encyclopedia. I think you are here to push an anti-LGBT point of view and we do not have a place for that here.
I read Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Bonadea. That blue box notifying you of the discretionary sanctions was your warning, as was the warning above it that you dismissed. I agree with the admin who called you a bigot. I think that User:Ymblanter did exactly the right thing here. I am declining your unblock request. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 22:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Invoking the Nazis – who persecuted gay people – makes it clear that this is pure trolling. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Now that the users talk page access has been removed I think it prudent that further conversation take place on another talk page. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
UTRS appeal #44860 is declined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Along with the indefinite block, the community has determined that you be site banned following community consensus. (see also: WP:CBAN) This means that an admin. should not lift the block without an unban discussion passing through the community first. diff — Ched ( talk) 06:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 20:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — regards, Revi 12:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
LGBT propaganda. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please read
WP:POVFORK. Creating a version based on"alternative" points of view isnot consistent with Wikipedia policy.
bonadea
contributions
talk
11:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
In addition, none of the three sources you included supports the notion that "LGBT propaganda" exists. -- bonadea contributions talk 11:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Can you be more explicit? I provided sources and nothing was my point of view from there. And gay agenda and LGBT propaganda are 2 different things. What do these abuses mean? JOrb ( talk) 11:22, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Talk:Gay agenda for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
01:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 14:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Sir, i feel offended. There is literally no need for this. Hope this was only a misunderstanding. Thank you! JOrb ( talk) 16:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
User:Ymblanter (
talk)
22:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)JOrb ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What was the reason for being blocked again? I hope you do realize this is an abuse... What did I do? I complained for being insulted and what i get is being insulted by administrators and blocked without warning...--JOrb (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
At 11:21, 26 June 2021 you were informed that personal opinion does not belong on Wikipedia. At 14:24, 26 June 2021 you were informed that articles on the subject of "gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them" were under discretionary sanctions and that editors working in those areas were expected to "follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic". You relied that this "offended you".
You continued pushing your POV in multiple places on Wikipedia. You characterized a human rights struggle as propaganda in the article space even though you had been reverted and told it was not appropriate. You took the law in a specific jurisdiction and declared it to be some sort of universal truth. Frankly to quote another editor you seemed to be intentionally being offensive for the sake of being offensive.
I have zero confidence that you are here to write a neutrally toned encyclopedia. I think you are here to push an anti-LGBT point of view and we do not have a place for that here.
I read Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Bonadea. That blue box notifying you of the discretionary sanctions was your warning, as was the warning above it that you dismissed. I agree with the admin who called you a bigot. I think that User:Ymblanter did exactly the right thing here. I am declining your unblock request. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 22:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Invoking the Nazis – who persecuted gay people – makes it clear that this is pure trolling. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Now that the users talk page access has been removed I think it prudent that further conversation take place on another talk page. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
UTRS appeal #44860 is declined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Along with the indefinite block, the community has determined that you be site banned following community consensus. (see also: WP:CBAN) This means that an admin. should not lift the block without an unban discussion passing through the community first. diff — Ched ( talk) 06:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)