I see you've been going through the very outdated list at User:RussBot/Untagged disambiguation pages, so I'm having the bot update it for you. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 15:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tidings of Comfort and Joy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiccan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I've removed it on quite a few dab pages already. I'll leave it alone from now on. — Xezbeth ( talk) 12:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to thank you for introducing me to the {{plant common name}} template that you substituted for the dab template on Umbrella Plant. It makes a lot of sense. Now, if I may, I want to ask a question about dab pages and their conditions of usage.
As an example there is Elk-sedge (disambiguation), which I created a few days ago after finding there was a one way redirect from Elk-sedge to Carex geyeri. Any student of Anglo-Saxon paganism knows that elk-sedge is the common English name for the Z rune and the archaic name for Cladium mariscus. And, so I found, it is the common name for Carex garberi. So a dab page was needed. Or so I thought until I learned of the {{plant common name}} template.
My question, after that rather circular introduction, is how can I do this better the next time such a problem comes up? Should I create a {{plant common name}} page with a hatnote to the single non-plant name, do it the way I did it or do it another way? Thanks Trilobitealive ( talk) 02:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for working on cleaning up the mess I've exacerbated over the last few months. I didn't really grasp the SIA/DAB distinction when I started adding that template (and apparently neither did a number of other editors whose example I was following), and I've been lazy in continuing to use it as a shortcut for {{ Plant common name}} since I figured out what SIAs were. I assume your edit leaving Buckthorn as a DAB ( [1]) was an oversight, or am I still not fully understanding the use of DABs? Plantdrew ( talk) 04:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your management of the reel to reel situation. LCS check ( talk) 13:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
What sort of articles should be covered by Category:Lists of people sharing a surname? Just "list of" surname articles or every single surname article that happens to have a list of names? — Xezbeth ( talk) 06:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Would you have any sources for newly created article Kevin Saunders (video game developer), currently at PROD? BOZ ( talk) 17:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey J. I wonder if you could take a look at the following DABs:
At first blush, I thought these should be combined, per WP:DPAGES. But at the bottom of that policy section it states that DAB's should be split if they become inconveniently long. However, I think many of the targets violate WP:DABRELATED and WP:PTM - especially for Red Line. Still, as mentioned by another editor on Talk:Red Line, there may be some logic in keeping these targets. How would you proceed?
(Note that blue line, green line, etc. are combined on a single DAB, albeit there aren't as many non-transportation terms.) Hoof Hearted ( talk) 13:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
HelloJHJ. As a member of the DAB wikiproject I was wondering if you could give us some direction and/or suggestions at this thread Talk:John Waters (1934 Academy Award winner)#Possible page move. Any input that you can give would be appreciated. No obligation though. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 21:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
— Darkwind ( talk) 00:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Well played! I can't even argue! [2] Red Slash 18:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Could you explain why you think the unreferenced stub at enforcement is an appropriate article? As I mentioned on the talk page, the stub is about management. The word enforcement is not a typical use of the word. It's more proper that such a general term be a disambig page i.e. Enforcement_(disambiguation). II | ( t - c) 23:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Firstly I should have checked the DAB for the edit history before posting on talk MOSDAB..it looked good because you'd already fixed it up! :) It is always a pleasure to see your fantastic work JHunterJ. I'm curious now...placement of SIA in See also (and similarly further disambiguation pages). MOSDAB hints placing further disambiguation pages in the See also - I'm currently assuming that it doesn't mean all further disambiguation, so I place them as if they are articles, the same for a SIA (although that is much more tricky for readers as they aren't as transparently not a final destination compared to a DAB). Long waffle, important question. (Feel free to move this to talk MOSDAB). Widefox; talk 10:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
It is rather inappropriate for you to use your administrative tools to undo an administrative action on an Somaya Reece, an article you are so heavily WP:INVOLVED with. I would ask that you please self revert the changing of the protection and either discuss it with the administrator and let the uninvolved administrator make that call or take it to WP:RFPP as appropriate. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 12:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to create a redirect from Die Young (song) (an incomplete disambiguation) to the dab page Die Young, but (song) appears to be a protected page: It didn't offer me any Create this article tab or line. Could you take a look and create the redirect if possible?-- ShelfSkewed Talk 04:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ. I see that you are cleaning up the Kamenicky disambiguation links. Unfortunately, I don't think the resulting redirection of links makes a lot of sense now. The actual disambiguation page (with three entries to individual articles) should be at Kamenicky (disambiguation) or Kamenicky (that is, without any diacritics), because this is the common nominator of the three entries and also what most English speaking people will be able to type. All spelling variants with diacritics should redirect there (for as long as there are not more similarly named articles which would justify their own disambiguation pages). Otherwise, on a Kameničky (disambiguation) page, it is somewhat odd to list Kamenický Šenov or Kamenický encoding, this would have to go under See also. Kameničky and Kamenický are not the same, but what they have in common is how an English would write them: Kamenicky, and therefore this is what needs disambiguation. And when typing Kamenicky, the primary topic is not the Kameničky article. If, by typing Kamenicky, someone actually was looking for Kamenický Šenov or Kamenický encoding, it is odd to be effectively redirected to a Kameničky (disambiguation) page now. Actually, except for the improved other uses hatnote, the old direction of redirects was much more logical, I think. I'm willing to clean it up, or will you? Greetings -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 11:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ,
I mentioned you by name at Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation#What.27s_with_pre-emptive_disambiguation.3F. I mean no criticism of you, but held of attempting to contextualize due to the likelihood of me being more mistaken than helpful. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Hunter,
Thank you for suggesting the discussion about partially disambiguated titles be moved to the Village Pump. I have restarted the discussion here.
Neelix ( talk) 15:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Were you aware of the existence of this project? BOZ ( talk) 14:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Several months ago, you edited Craftmanship, which is currently a redirect to Handicraft. I've nominated it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 May 27 for retargeting, since the identical concept of Craftsmanship has a different target. Your input to help decide the proper target for both titles would be appreciated. Nyttend ( talk) 02:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi J,
I was wondering if you could take a look to see if you had any sources for Darlene Pekul. BOZ ( talk) 01:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
PASSAGES is a portfolio of work by new talents Ken Raney, Darlene Pekul, Robert Landry, Gary Cook, and Butch Guice. PASSAGES is available in a signed/numbered ed. of 100 and a regular ed. of 200: the signed ed. contains new art by ..." , but the snippet view is showing blank. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 14:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I have a suggestion, not for a specific change, but for something systemic you may find it useful to think about. Nuances of feedback to a contributor can have great impact on the contribution experience.
You reverted my edit to Ford (disambiguation). I don't care all that much about the page itself; I was merely trying to be a good samaritan by fixing what looked, for all the world, like a blatant violation of common sense, and the highly off-putting response to my efforts is food for thought.
What strikes me about your revert (reverts, actually, as you reverted me twice) is a lack of meaningful explanation of why you were doing it. On your first revert, since I saw no meaningful explanation I conjectured you might simply have mistakenly reverted it due to being very busy; in my experience, long-term active contributors to wikimedia projects are chronically short of time for the project, hence this possible explanation lept to mind. From your second revert it appears it wasn't a mistake; but frankly, it seems a systemic failure that it took a second revert just to indicate the first one wasn't a mistake, and further systemic failure that the second revert still didn't give me a rational explanation.
The problem with such situations is, I believe, that the folks doing this sort of revert are generally busy — it's hard enough to find time to identify and effect the reverts, without also having to write beautiful prose explaining each one. So perhaps thought needs to go into how to make it easy to give better edit summaries on these sorts of reverts. -- Pi zero ( talk) 02:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
NRW (disambiguation) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there
Just wanted to enquire why you think the redirect from Willy to Penis is not legitimate. I accept that the article as it stands does not mention the term explicitly, but I imagine if it was fully developed it would be legitimate for it to do so, in a disussion of alternative names for the subject. And while you may think the term "willy" is childish or slang, it is nonetheless a valid term in the English language for the penis, which means that if there were no other meanings it would be a redirect. Since there are other meanings, an entry on the disambig page seems appropriate, as is indeed the case for
Fanny,
Cock and other terms of this nature. Thanks! —
Amakuru (
talk)
21:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Cock may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lazarus (name) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Trinity (disambiguation) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Echo may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Dungeons & Dragons retro-clones may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:05, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for putting it back. I have been looking everywhere for the exception, and still can't find it. Please point me to the guideline. Many thanks. Oh, and while we're on the subject, would you consider that a set index? Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Java API for XML (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 17:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Do you think Whodunit (disambiguation) and Who Done It? should be combined as spelling variants per WP:DPAGE? Hoof Hearted ( talk) 19:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
I see you've been going through the very outdated list at User:RussBot/Untagged disambiguation pages, so I'm having the bot update it for you. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 15:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tidings of Comfort and Joy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiccan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I've removed it on quite a few dab pages already. I'll leave it alone from now on. — Xezbeth ( talk) 12:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to thank you for introducing me to the {{plant common name}} template that you substituted for the dab template on Umbrella Plant. It makes a lot of sense. Now, if I may, I want to ask a question about dab pages and their conditions of usage.
As an example there is Elk-sedge (disambiguation), which I created a few days ago after finding there was a one way redirect from Elk-sedge to Carex geyeri. Any student of Anglo-Saxon paganism knows that elk-sedge is the common English name for the Z rune and the archaic name for Cladium mariscus. And, so I found, it is the common name for Carex garberi. So a dab page was needed. Or so I thought until I learned of the {{plant common name}} template.
My question, after that rather circular introduction, is how can I do this better the next time such a problem comes up? Should I create a {{plant common name}} page with a hatnote to the single non-plant name, do it the way I did it or do it another way? Thanks Trilobitealive ( talk) 02:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for working on cleaning up the mess I've exacerbated over the last few months. I didn't really grasp the SIA/DAB distinction when I started adding that template (and apparently neither did a number of other editors whose example I was following), and I've been lazy in continuing to use it as a shortcut for {{ Plant common name}} since I figured out what SIAs were. I assume your edit leaving Buckthorn as a DAB ( [1]) was an oversight, or am I still not fully understanding the use of DABs? Plantdrew ( talk) 04:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your management of the reel to reel situation. LCS check ( talk) 13:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
What sort of articles should be covered by Category:Lists of people sharing a surname? Just "list of" surname articles or every single surname article that happens to have a list of names? — Xezbeth ( talk) 06:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Would you have any sources for newly created article Kevin Saunders (video game developer), currently at PROD? BOZ ( talk) 17:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey J. I wonder if you could take a look at the following DABs:
At first blush, I thought these should be combined, per WP:DPAGES. But at the bottom of that policy section it states that DAB's should be split if they become inconveniently long. However, I think many of the targets violate WP:DABRELATED and WP:PTM - especially for Red Line. Still, as mentioned by another editor on Talk:Red Line, there may be some logic in keeping these targets. How would you proceed?
(Note that blue line, green line, etc. are combined on a single DAB, albeit there aren't as many non-transportation terms.) Hoof Hearted ( talk) 13:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
HelloJHJ. As a member of the DAB wikiproject I was wondering if you could give us some direction and/or suggestions at this thread Talk:John Waters (1934 Academy Award winner)#Possible page move. Any input that you can give would be appreciated. No obligation though. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 21:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
— Darkwind ( talk) 00:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Well played! I can't even argue! [2] Red Slash 18:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Could you explain why you think the unreferenced stub at enforcement is an appropriate article? As I mentioned on the talk page, the stub is about management. The word enforcement is not a typical use of the word. It's more proper that such a general term be a disambig page i.e. Enforcement_(disambiguation). II | ( t - c) 23:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Firstly I should have checked the DAB for the edit history before posting on talk MOSDAB..it looked good because you'd already fixed it up! :) It is always a pleasure to see your fantastic work JHunterJ. I'm curious now...placement of SIA in See also (and similarly further disambiguation pages). MOSDAB hints placing further disambiguation pages in the See also - I'm currently assuming that it doesn't mean all further disambiguation, so I place them as if they are articles, the same for a SIA (although that is much more tricky for readers as they aren't as transparently not a final destination compared to a DAB). Long waffle, important question. (Feel free to move this to talk MOSDAB). Widefox; talk 10:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
It is rather inappropriate for you to use your administrative tools to undo an administrative action on an Somaya Reece, an article you are so heavily WP:INVOLVED with. I would ask that you please self revert the changing of the protection and either discuss it with the administrator and let the uninvolved administrator make that call or take it to WP:RFPP as appropriate. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 12:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to create a redirect from Die Young (song) (an incomplete disambiguation) to the dab page Die Young, but (song) appears to be a protected page: It didn't offer me any Create this article tab or line. Could you take a look and create the redirect if possible?-- ShelfSkewed Talk 04:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ. I see that you are cleaning up the Kamenicky disambiguation links. Unfortunately, I don't think the resulting redirection of links makes a lot of sense now. The actual disambiguation page (with three entries to individual articles) should be at Kamenicky (disambiguation) or Kamenicky (that is, without any diacritics), because this is the common nominator of the three entries and also what most English speaking people will be able to type. All spelling variants with diacritics should redirect there (for as long as there are not more similarly named articles which would justify their own disambiguation pages). Otherwise, on a Kameničky (disambiguation) page, it is somewhat odd to list Kamenický Šenov or Kamenický encoding, this would have to go under See also. Kameničky and Kamenický are not the same, but what they have in common is how an English would write them: Kamenicky, and therefore this is what needs disambiguation. And when typing Kamenicky, the primary topic is not the Kameničky article. If, by typing Kamenicky, someone actually was looking for Kamenický Šenov or Kamenický encoding, it is odd to be effectively redirected to a Kameničky (disambiguation) page now. Actually, except for the improved other uses hatnote, the old direction of redirects was much more logical, I think. I'm willing to clean it up, or will you? Greetings -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 11:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ,
I mentioned you by name at Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation#What.27s_with_pre-emptive_disambiguation.3F. I mean no criticism of you, but held of attempting to contextualize due to the likelihood of me being more mistaken than helpful. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Hunter,
Thank you for suggesting the discussion about partially disambiguated titles be moved to the Village Pump. I have restarted the discussion here.
Neelix ( talk) 15:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Were you aware of the existence of this project? BOZ ( talk) 14:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Several months ago, you edited Craftmanship, which is currently a redirect to Handicraft. I've nominated it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 May 27 for retargeting, since the identical concept of Craftsmanship has a different target. Your input to help decide the proper target for both titles would be appreciated. Nyttend ( talk) 02:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi J,
I was wondering if you could take a look to see if you had any sources for Darlene Pekul. BOZ ( talk) 01:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
PASSAGES is a portfolio of work by new talents Ken Raney, Darlene Pekul, Robert Landry, Gary Cook, and Butch Guice. PASSAGES is available in a signed/numbered ed. of 100 and a regular ed. of 200: the signed ed. contains new art by ..." , but the snippet view is showing blank. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 14:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I have a suggestion, not for a specific change, but for something systemic you may find it useful to think about. Nuances of feedback to a contributor can have great impact on the contribution experience.
You reverted my edit to Ford (disambiguation). I don't care all that much about the page itself; I was merely trying to be a good samaritan by fixing what looked, for all the world, like a blatant violation of common sense, and the highly off-putting response to my efforts is food for thought.
What strikes me about your revert (reverts, actually, as you reverted me twice) is a lack of meaningful explanation of why you were doing it. On your first revert, since I saw no meaningful explanation I conjectured you might simply have mistakenly reverted it due to being very busy; in my experience, long-term active contributors to wikimedia projects are chronically short of time for the project, hence this possible explanation lept to mind. From your second revert it appears it wasn't a mistake; but frankly, it seems a systemic failure that it took a second revert just to indicate the first one wasn't a mistake, and further systemic failure that the second revert still didn't give me a rational explanation.
The problem with such situations is, I believe, that the folks doing this sort of revert are generally busy — it's hard enough to find time to identify and effect the reverts, without also having to write beautiful prose explaining each one. So perhaps thought needs to go into how to make it easy to give better edit summaries on these sorts of reverts. -- Pi zero ( talk) 02:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
NRW (disambiguation) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there
Just wanted to enquire why you think the redirect from Willy to Penis is not legitimate. I accept that the article as it stands does not mention the term explicitly, but I imagine if it was fully developed it would be legitimate for it to do so, in a disussion of alternative names for the subject. And while you may think the term "willy" is childish or slang, it is nonetheless a valid term in the English language for the penis, which means that if there were no other meanings it would be a redirect. Since there are other meanings, an entry on the disambig page seems appropriate, as is indeed the case for
Fanny,
Cock and other terms of this nature. Thanks! —
Amakuru (
talk)
21:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Cock may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lazarus (name) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Trinity (disambiguation) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Echo may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Dungeons & Dragons retro-clones may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:05, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for putting it back. I have been looking everywhere for the exception, and still can't find it. Please point me to the guideline. Many thanks. Oh, and while we're on the subject, would you consider that a set index? Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Java API for XML (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 17:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Do you think Whodunit (disambiguation) and Who Done It? should be combined as spelling variants per WP:DPAGE? Hoof Hearted ( talk) 19:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC)